Diesel Exhaust Linked to Greater Lung Cancer Risk: WHO Study

|

Exposure to diesel exhaust from trucks, trains and other diesel engines pose a risk of cancer for humans, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). 

WHO’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) published an announcement on June 12, indicating that the group has classified diesel engine exhaust as carcinogenic to humans (PDF). This places the gas fumes in the same category as exposure to radiation, cigarettes and other known cancer causing products.

The decision came after a week-long meeting involving international experts, who determined that diesel exhaust exposure increases the risk of lung cancer. There is also evidence of an association with bladder cancer.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

Since 1988, the IARC has considered diesel fumes to be a probable carcinogen. The group decided to revisit the classification after a study published in March by the U.S. National Cancer Institute found that diesel exhaust exposure was linked to lung cancer deaths among U.S. miners.

“Large populations are exposed to diesel exhaust in everyday life, whether through their occupation or through the ambient air,” IARC reported. “People are exposed not only to motor vehicle exhausts but also to exhausts from other diesel engines, including from other modes of transport (e.g. diesel trains and ships) and from power generators.”

The new classification and the scientific evidence the agency gathered will make it politically easier for governments to place new restrictions and regulations on diesel exhaust. However, the agency left it up to individual governments and future studies to determine what level of diesel exhaust exposure was a threat to human health.

The IARC working group that tackled the issue decided not to change the categorization of gasoline exhaust from its current rating as possibly carcinogenic to humans, which has been the classification since 1989.

A summary of the IARC diesel exhaust evaluation is slated to be published tomorrow in the online edition of The Lancet Oncology.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A federal judge has scheduled a series of case management conferences throughout 2026 as the parties prepare for five “pilot” bellwether trials, which are expected to begin in late 2026 or early 2027.
An increasing number of Ozempic and Mounjaro users are reporting sudden, irreversible vision loss from NAION side effects, prompting new lawsuits and a federal push to consolidate blindness claims into a dedicated multidistrict litigation.
Cartiva is urging federal judges to reject consolidation of toe-implant lawsuits, arguing that an MDL would interfere with individual claim resolutions that the company says are already being handled efficiently outside of court.