Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
FDA To Allow Manufacturers to Only Warn Of Most Serious Drug Side Effects February 10, 2015 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsFederal regulators are looking to make major changes to how drugs will be advertised, requiring manufacturers to only warn about major side effects associated with their medications.ย The FDA issued a draft guidance (PDF) this month, on promotional and advertising labeling of drugs. If approved, the guidance would allow drug manufacturers to get rid of lengthy lists of all drug side effects in commercials and print ads. Instead, they would only be required to publish the most important potential side effects.This would mean an end to long lists of adverse events, because the FDA believes that consumers are ignoring them and missing important risk information.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION“FDA believes these approaches are not optimal for consumer-directed prescription drug print advertisements and promotional labeling pieces because many consumers lack the technical background to understand some of the information as described in the PI (prescribing information),” the guidance notes. “To provide better and more actionable information for consumers, FDA believes that the brief summary should focus on the more important risk information rather than an exhaustive list of risks and that information should be presented in a way most likely to be understood by consumers. Thus, FDA strongly recommends against the use of the traditional approach to fulfill the brief summary requirement in consumer-directed advertisements, an approach in which risk-related sections of the PI are presented verbatim, often in small font.”The FDA conducted a survey that found only a few respondents reported reading half or more of the brief summary that has been previously required. Of those who did read the summaries, 55% found them hard to read, and 40% of respondents said they did not read any of the brief summary in direct-to-consumer prescription drug print advertisements.The revised guidance suggests that the inclusion of minor risks “detract from, and make it difficult for, consumers to comprehend and retain information about the more important risks.”As a result, the FDA says it will not object if, in the future, drug manufacturers fail to include every specific side effect and contraindication in promotional print advertisements. However, these changes will not affect the requirements for the actual drug labels themselves.The agency’s guidance will encourage manufacturers to use “consumer-friendly” language in all advertisements aimed at consumers. These should include clinically significant information on the most serious and most common risks in a conversational language. The advertisements would still be required to notify consumers of:Boxed WarningsContraindicationsThe most clinically significant warnings and precautionsInformation that could affect the decision to take a drugRequired monitoring and laboratory testsSpecial precautionsMeasures that can be taken to prevent or lessen harmful drug side effects.The most frequently occurring adverse reactions.The FDA is accepting public comments for 90 days on the draft guidance. Comments can be submitted electronically to http://www.regulations.gov and written comments can be sent to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Drug Side Effects Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Lawsuit Alleges Roblox Sexual Predator Convinced 8-Year-Old Girl To Send Him Explicit Videos May 14, 2026 Ozempic and Mounjaro Drug Class Linked to 35% Higher NAION Vision Loss Risk May 14, 2026 Gourmia Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Alleges Lid Interlock Failure Caused Life-Altering Burn Injuries May 14, 2026 0 Comments PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott Eterna Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunction Resulted in Worsening Pain (Posted: yesterday)According to a lawsuit brought against the manufacturer and the FDA, an Abbott Eterna spinal cord stimulator has caused pain, shocks and complications instead of the relief promised.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges SCS Lead Failure Caused Nerve Damage (05/06/2026)Lawsuit Claims Abbott, Boston Scientific SCS Pre-Market Approval Supplements Caused Permanent Injuries (04/29/2026)JPML Sets Hearing Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Consolidation for May 28 (04/24/2026) Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (Posted: 2 days ago)A Depo-Provera intracranial meningioma lawsuit claims Pfizer developed and sold a defective birth control injection that puts women at a five times increased risk of brain tumors.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLawsuit Blames Depo Shot for Brain Tumors, Intense Headaches (04/28/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (04/22/2026)Hearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026) Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: 3 days ago)A lawsuit alleges an Illinois woman developed CTCL after using Dupixent, raising concerns the manufacturer may have withheld concerns that the drug could contribute to cancer.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Dupixent Lymphoma Diagnosis Resulted in Multiple Rounds of Chemotherapy (05/01/2026)Judges Will Consider MDL for Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Late Next Month (04/21/2026)Dupixent Injections Caused Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Diagnosis: Lawsuit (04/06/2026)
Lawsuit Alleges Roblox Sexual Predator Convinced 8-Year-Old Girl To Send Him Explicit Videos May 14, 2026
Gourmia Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Alleges Lid Interlock Failure Caused Life-Altering Burn Injuries May 14, 2026
Abbott Eterna Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunction Resulted in Worsening Pain (Posted: yesterday)According to a lawsuit brought against the manufacturer and the FDA, an Abbott Eterna spinal cord stimulator has caused pain, shocks and complications instead of the relief promised.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges SCS Lead Failure Caused Nerve Damage (05/06/2026)Lawsuit Claims Abbott, Boston Scientific SCS Pre-Market Approval Supplements Caused Permanent Injuries (04/29/2026)JPML Sets Hearing Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Consolidation for May 28 (04/24/2026)
Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (Posted: 2 days ago)A Depo-Provera intracranial meningioma lawsuit claims Pfizer developed and sold a defective birth control injection that puts women at a five times increased risk of brain tumors.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLawsuit Blames Depo Shot for Brain Tumors, Intense Headaches (04/28/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (04/22/2026)Hearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)
Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: 3 days ago)A lawsuit alleges an Illinois woman developed CTCL after using Dupixent, raising concerns the manufacturer may have withheld concerns that the drug could contribute to cancer.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITLawsuit Indicates Dupixent Lymphoma Diagnosis Resulted in Multiple Rounds of Chemotherapy (05/01/2026)Judges Will Consider MDL for Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Late Next Month (04/21/2026)Dupixent Injections Caused Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Diagnosis: Lawsuit (04/06/2026)