Elmiron Caused “Potentially Irreversible” Vision Damage: Lawsuit

|

According to allegations raised in a recently filed product liability lawsuit, the toxic effects of Elmiron on the retina left a Tennessee woman with serious and potentially irreversible vision damage after years of exposure to the interstitial cystitis treatment.

Sherry Dobbins and her husband, James, filed the complaint (PDF) in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on July 28, pursuing claims against Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., its parent company, Johnson & Johnson, and Teva Pharmaceuticals as defendants.

Elmiron (pentosan polysulfate sodium or PPS) is the only approved drug treatment for interstitial cystitis, also commonly referred to as โ€œpainful bladder syndromeโ€, and has been marketed as safe and effective since 1996. Although concerns existed for years among vision specialists about the risk of retina damage,ย Elmiron vision warnings were not added to the drug label in the U.S.ย until June 2020.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

The label update came after a series of independent studies and case reports published in recent years highlighted cases involving visual injury and pigmentary changes in the retina among long-term users of Elmiron. The drug has been linked to reports in which users to experienced difficulty adjusting in dark light, problems reading, centralized dark spots and other complications, yet information about the risk of pigmentary maculpathy was withheld from the drug warning label for years.

According to the lawsuit, Dobbins began taking Elmiron in 2004 for interstitial cystitis. She was diagnosed with retinal pigmentary changes in June 2020.

โ€œAs a result of the defective nature of Elmiron, persons who were prescribed and ingested Elmiron, including Plaintiff Sherry Dobbins have suffered and may continue to suffer severe and permanent personal injuries, including but not limited to retinal pigmentary changes, vision changes, and potentially irreversible vision damage,โ€ the lawsuit states.

Since most ophthalmologists were previously unaware of theย Elmiron vision damage risksย associated with the bladder drug, a growing number of long-term Elmiron users are just now learning that they may have been previously misdiagnosed with other retinal diseases, such as macular degeneration, pattern dystrophy and other problems, which were actually caused by the toxic effects of the drug on the eyes.

Asย Elmiron lawyersย continue to review and file claims in the coming months and years, it is expected that hundreds of similar complaints may be brought in state and federal courts nationwide.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A federal judge is being asked to certify seven hair relaxer class action lawsuits seeking medical monitoring for users, following studies that link the products to an increased risk of cancer.
Three sports betting addiction lawsuits claim the plaintiffs were targeted by FanDuel and DraftKings apps once addictive gambling qualities were detected, leading the platforms to exploit them even more.
At least three Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits were filed this week, making it the latest manufacturer to face multiple claims alleging the implants are defectively designed.