Lawsuit Alleges Painful Bladder Drug Elmiron Caused Pigmentary Changes and Irreversible Vision Loss

|

In a recently filed product liability lawsuit, a California woman indicates the side effects of Elmiron may have permanently worsened her vision, causing her to suffer retinal pigmentary changes.

The complaint (PDF) was filed late last month by Iris Smith in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California, indicating the manufacturers of the interstitial cystitis drug failed to adequately warn users and the medical community about the vision risks.

Smith indicates she began taking Elmiron (pentosan polysulfate sodium or PPS) in 2000, and continued to take the treatment for years to address her bladder pain. However, after she began treatment, Smith indicates Elmiron caused pigmentary changes in her retina, which could leave her with permanent vision loss.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

โ€œThe development of Plaintiff Iris Smithโ€™s injuries was preventable and resulted directly from Defendantsโ€™ failure and refusal to conduct proper safety studies, failure to properly assess and publicize safety signals, suppression of information revealing serious risks, willful and wanton failure to provide adequate instructions, and willful misrepresentations concerning the nature and safety of Elmiron,โ€ the lawsuit states. โ€œThis conduct, as well as the product defects complained of herein, was a substantial factor in bringing about and exacerbating Plaintiffโ€™s injuries.โ€

Although Elmiron has been on the market for decades, no warnings were provided about the toxic effect the painful bladder drug may have on the retina until earlier this year, leaving many doctors unaware the medication may be the cause of blindness and vision problems experienced by long-term users.

It was only after a series of independent case reports and studies were published about the link between Elmiron and pigmentary maculopathy that the drug maker announced aย warning label update in June 2020, which now advises users, urologists and opthalmologists that Elmiron may cause retinal pigmentary changes, resulting in vision problems like difficulty adjusting in dark light, trouble reading, centralized dark spots and complete blindness.

Since most ophthalmologists were previously unaware of theย vision risksย associated with Elmiron, many users were misdiagnosed with other forms of retinal disease and continued to be exposed to the medication, further worsening the damage.

Smith’s claim joins a growing number of Elmiron lawsuitsย now being pursued throughout the U.S. court system. However, as lawyers continue to review and file claims in the coming months and years, it is expected that hundreds, if not thousands, of similar complaints may be brought in state and federal courts nationwide.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A group of federal judges will determine whether all Dupixent cancer lawsuits should be formed into a multidistrict litigation, following oral arguments set for May 28.
A product liability lawsuit alleges unlicensed Abbott representatives made real-time spinal cord stimulator programming decisions based on a Texas womanโ€™s responses, improperly modifying the device and contributing to her injuries.