Common Chemicals Increase Risk of Fibroids, Endometriosis For Women: Study
New research indicates that women may face a potential risk of several reproductive disorders from common endocrine-disrupting chemicals, as well as highlighting the large economic burden the chemicals cause.
In a study published this month in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, researchers from New York University School of Medicine found that exposure to controversial chemicals, like phthalates and diphenyldichlorethene (DDE), increase a woman’s likelihood of developing endometriosis and fibroids. The economic burden from those conditions could cost as much as $1.5 billion, according to the findings.
Researchers focused on DDE exposures among women of reproductive age in Europe and the association between DDE levels in the blood, as well as fibroid diagnosis. An expert panel evaluated the evidence for the probability that the chemicals caused female reproductive disorders.
Did You Know?
Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled
Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.Learn More
Fibroids and endometriosis are two common conditions that affect an estimated 70% of women and are the leading causes of female infertility.
According to the study, nearly 57,000 cases of fibroids in women were attributable to DDE exposure. DDE is what happens when the insecticide DDT breaks down. DDT is considered toxic. It was banned in Europe in 1970 and the U.S. in 1972. DDE lingers in the environment and enters the body through food.
Researchers also found 145,000 women with phthalate-attributable endometriosis. Humans are mainly exposed to phthalates through eating and drinking from plastic containers that have phthalates.
Endocrine disrupting chemicals are used in many consumer products, including plastic food containers, the lining in canned food, cosmetics, and even in cash register receipts at supermarkets, gas stations and ATM machines.
Financial Side Effects of Fibroids and Endometriosis
The study also estimated the burden of the female reproductive disorders linked to the chemicals in Europe in 2010. The total combined economic and health care costs reached 163 million Euros attributed to fibroids and 1.25 billion Euros to endometriosis. The total cost in Euros would be equivalent to more than $1.5 billion in the U.S.
Researchers who published this study are also estimating the economic burden endocrine disrupting chemicals pose to the U.S. That study will be published this summer.
The estimated cost in this latest study was based on the cost of treating the conditions, including surgery. However, the estimates would be even greater if the cost of infertility and other health problems associated with fibroids and endometriosis caused by those conditions, including the increased risk of cancer and autoimmune conditions, were considered, researchers said.
Researchers emphasized this representation is only for chemicals for which there were sufficient epidemiological studies, and those with the highest probability of causation. The true burden could far exceed the original estimate if all endocrine disrupting chemicals were considered.
The European Union is considering criteria to set limits for exposure to endocrine disruptors.
JacquelineSeptember 3, 2018 at 12:34 pm
I was forced to into having a hysterectomy due to the numerous and severely large fibroids I had developed. I know cancer is a horrible outcome but why are they not being held accountable for the many women, especially women of color, that were forced into steralization? This company took life away from their customers in two ways: those unfortunate to have lost or are losing their lives due to ca[Show More]I was forced to into having a hysterectomy due to the numerous and severely large fibroids I had developed. I know cancer is a horrible outcome but why are they not being held accountable for the many women, especially women of color, that were forced into steralization? This company took life away from their customers in two ways: those unfortunate to have lost or are losing their lives due to cancer and those of us that no longer have the ability to give life, due to forced hysterectomies. It's going to be 4 years, since I've had my hysterectomy, due to uterine fibroids and I cry almost every day. If I was in a car accident and forced to have a hysterectomy, due to injury, my attorney would sue because of this loss and permanent injury because of the lasting affect it would have on my life. Why is this any different? Why?
"*" indicates required fields
More Top Stories
A group of plaintiffs have asked a panel of federal judges to consolidate all lawsuits over Ozempic, Wegovy and Mounjaro stomach paralysis injuries before one judge for pretrial procedures.
Although Suboxone settlements have been paid to resolve antitrust violations, users who suffered damages due to tooth decay from Suboxone film must pursue individual product liability lawsuits
With thousands of Bard hernia mesh lawsuits pending in the federal court system, a fourth bellwether trial will be held in the spring, involving allegations that defects with Bard 3DMax caused painful and permanent injuries.