Eye Drops Vision Damage Lawsuit Filed Over Bacteria in Recalled Artificial Tears

Massachusetts woman was left with permanent vision damage from eye drops contaminated with bacteria, which were sold through Amazon.com

According to allegations raised in a recently filed product liability lawsuit, a Massachusetts woman was left with permanent and debilitating vision damage from recalled Ezricare Artificial Tears purchased on Amazon.com, indicating that the eye drops were contaminated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Conceicao Gouveia last month in New Jersey federal court, alleging that her severe eye infection was caused by the manufacturer and on-line retailer’s failure to appropriately test the eye drops for bacteria.

The eye drops were part of a massive EzriCare Artificial Tears recall first announced by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in February 2023, following at least 55 reports involving users who suffered eye infections after exposure to bacteria in the eye drops.

The strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa linked to recalled Artificial Tears eye drops poses a major health risk due to its antibiotic resistance and capability of mutating quickly. In severe cases, Pseudomonas aeruginosa may cause endophthalmitis, which is a rare but serious infection of the eyeball that can cause inflammation and destruction of the tissue throughout the eye, resulting in irreversible blindness.

Gouveia now joins a growing number of consumers who are pursuing Artificial Tears eye drop vision damage lawsuits, alleging that bacteria caused a wide range of health problems, including vision loss, eye infections, bloodstream infections and other injuries. At least four deaths have now been linked to the eye drops, as well as a number of users who required surgical removal of their eye.

EYE DROPS RECALL LAWSUITS

Did you or a loved one use recalled eye drops?

Lawyers are investigating EzriCare Artificial Tears lawsuits for individuals who experienced eye infections, blindness or other problems following use of the recalled eye drops.

Learn More About this Lawsuit SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

According to her lawsuit, Gouveia, of Massachusetts, purchased Ezricare Artificial Tears eye drops through Amazon.com in May 2022. In January 2023, she began experiencing redness, itching, sharp pain, and burning in her eyes. She also began seeing floaters, light flashes.

In February 2023, Gouveia was diagnosed with dry eye syndrome, double vision, ocular headaches, posterior vitreous detachment and blurred vision, as well as vitreous membranes and strands.

“As a result of Plaintiff’s use of EzriCare Artificial Tears, she developed serious ocular irritation, which caused her vision to be blurred and/or diminished as well as extreme discomfort,” the lawsuit states. “Plaintiff’s injuries are debilitating and permanent in nature.”

When the Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteria outbreak began, the U.S. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) traced the contamination back to bottles of EzriCare Artificial Tears products. It was the first time this particular strain of the bacteria was discovered in an outbreak in the United States.

Gouveia’s lawsuit indicates EzriCare failed to properly test its products and ensure that they were sterile, resulting in at least 81 infection reports. She presents claims of failure to warn, defective design and manufacture, negligence and gross negligence, negligent failure to warn, negligent design and manufacture defect, negligent misrepresentation, fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of warranty, negligent failure to timely recall, and violations of New Jersey consumer protection laws. The lawsuit seeks both compensatory and punitive damages.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

More Than 9,600 Join Suboxone Lawsuit Over Tooth Decay in MDL Filing
More Than 9,600 Join Suboxone Lawsuit Over Tooth Decay in MDL Filing (Posted today)

A bundled complaint of about 9,600 Suboxone lawsuits were filed in federal court on Friday, ahead of the two-year anniversary of the FDA requiring tooth decay label warnings on the opioid treatment film strips, which is also a deadline for filing a civil complaint in many states.

Lawyers Propose Direct Filing of Toxic Baby Food Lawsuits Over Autism, ADHD in Federal MDL
Lawyers Propose Direct Filing of Toxic Baby Food Lawsuits Over Autism, ADHD in Federal MDL (Posted today)

A federal judge has been asked to allow direct filing of future baby food lawsuits over autism and ADHD side effects with the MDL court, but the parties disagree over whether that order should allow multi-plaintiff complaints.

Social Media Mental Health Warnings Should Be Required To Protect Teens: U.S. Surgeon General
Social Media Mental Health Warnings Should Be Required To Protect Teens: U.S. Surgeon General (Posted 2 days ago)

U.S. Surgeon General says social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Tiktok should carry label warnings, alerting parents that youth who use the platforms face an increased risk of mental health side effects.