Skip Navigation

Gardasil Settlement Will Result in $50M Payout by HPV Vaccine Manufacturer

Gardasil Settlement Will Result in $50M Payout by HPV Vaccine Manufacturer

Merck & Co. has reached an agreement to pay $50 million to settle hundreds of Gardasil lawsuits, which raise allegations that the controversial HPV vaccineโ€™s side effects left young adults with serious neurological and other adverse health problems.

The Gardasil settlement was reported by Bloomberg News on June 4, indicating that the deal was confirmed in an emailed statement from Merck officials. Following years of litigation, Merck claims that the payouts should resolve all lawsuits over the HPV vaccine, except for one remaining case.

First introduced in 2006, Gardasil is a widely used vaccine administered to young girls and boys for the prevention of human papillomavirus, or HPV, infections, which can cause cervical cancer and other forms of cancer. HPV is sexually transmitted, and the vaccine has been promoted as an important tool for preventing HPV-related cancers later in life.

Despite the companyโ€™s claims that the vaccine is safe, Gardasil side effect lawsuits have been filed over postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (POTS), premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), premature menopause, seizures and other autoimmune disorders, which allegedly emerged shortly after patients received the injections. These allegations resulted in hundreds of claims being filed nationwide by former Gardasil recipients and their families.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

All claims filed in federal court involving the vaccineโ€™s alleged side effects have been consolidated in the Western District of North Carolina since August 2022, where U.S. District Judge Kenneth D. Bell presided over coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.

The litigation was originally expected to include a series of bellwether trials, which were designed to test the strengths and weaknesses of the partiesโ€™ evidence before actual juries and help guide potential settlement negotiations.

However, as the bellwether trials were being prepared, Merck filed a motion for summary judgment in early March 2025, asking the court to dismiss many of the claims before trial. Judge Bell agreed that the Gardasil manufacturer should be immune from state law-based failure to warn claims involving POTS and POI injuries, which made up the majority of claims in the litigation, determining that those claims were preempted by federal law.

The ruling effectively removed many of the central claims from the Gardasil MDL, finding that plaintiffs could not pursue warning-based allegations under state law because the claims conflicted with the federal regulatory framework governing vaccine labeling. Last July, the plaintiffs whose cases were dismissed filed an appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, but the appeals court rejected the motion in September.

According to Bloombergโ€™s report, the dismissed POTS and POI cases will be included in the $50 million Gardasil settlement, which will address more than 200 total claims. The manufacturer first reported a potential settlement in its annual earnings report in February, indicating at the time that the deal would only be finalized if enough Gardasil plaintiffs approved the agreement.

Merck indicates the agreement is not a confession of liability, stating that the settlement is significantly cheaper than continuing to defend every lawsuit in court. The company has maintained that Gardasil remains safe and effective, and that it stands behind the vaccineโ€™s safety profile.

Irvin Jackson
Written By: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.



8 Comments


Samantha
My daughter started having symptoms of POTS shortly after receiving the Gardasil vaccine. This caused her to unenroll from traditional school in Indiana and continue schooling at home, which was very difficult. We moved to Tennessee just before her senior year and had to fight with the schools for her to be able to wear her smartwatch, which alerts her abnormal heart rates/rhythm, giving her a chance to sit before fainting. However the school had a zero electronics policy so we had to threaten lawsuits and argue with the entire schoolboard to allow her to use her watch. Even the physical act of walking up and down the stairs was too much for her. She dreamed of joining the military and enrolled in the JROTC course at her high school. Due to her POTS, the instructor deemed her high risk to be a heat casualty and refused to allow her to engage in the program further. My daughter was stuck being the photographer for the entire year. I knew in my heart that Gardasil was the culprit for these issues and even told my doctor several times, as well as other doctors. At this point I have refused this vaccine for my other children, even though I’ve been told they are at a higher risk of HPV related complications and illnesses due to my own HPV history which resulted in cervical cancer. Due to my history, it seemed like vaccinating my children was the right thing to do. Now knowing my consent in this matter has caused irreparable damage to my daughter has caused us both emotional distress on top of her current medical complications.

antoinette
Retinitis and gardasil.

Elizabeth
My oldest daughter started having complications after having the Guardasil 3-shot series. She had a full ride academic scholarship to a very good college in our state because of her academic excellence. She received the shots during the summer before she left for college. She was unable to handle even one semester at college because of POTS & neurological complications! She still struggles 7 years later with these problems and has never been able to go back to college. I know in my heart that those shots harmed my daughter!!

Stef
I am 34. I had this shit as a teen. I now have 1 ovary, POTS/Dysautonomia. Dr believes in having seizures too. I didnt know it had this vaccine until my mom told me and I connected the dots… how many people are out there and don’t know, like myself…

Beverly
My daughter had one injection, and has since developed tachycardia, and had to have surgery on her heart.

Roberta
2014 daughter received first dose, 6 mo ths later had first seizure and has been nedicated since

Roxanne
Saying โ€œDespite the companyโ€™s claim that the vaccine is safeโ€ implies that itโ€™s not. Why are you implying that?

Charlie
Is there even a proposed mechanism for this vaccine to have caused POTS and POI and all these other things? How can it be the cause of POTS, for example, if no one currently knows what causes POTS? The reason for this unscientific settlement is because in this country emotions are allowed to influence outcomes (through juries).

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Plaintiffs and defendants have submitted a joint schedule for a final pretrial conference before the second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial over claims the port catheter is defectively designed.
Analysts expect wider use of breast reconstruction mesh through 2030, even as lawsuits raise questions about synthetic products, FDA approval and serious complications requiring additional surgery.