Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Gas Can Lawsuit Filed Over Explosion Caused by Lack of Flame Arrestor February 20, 2009 AboutLawsuits Add Your CommentsThree men who suffered severe injuries and burns when a portable gas can exploded, have filed a product liability lawsuit against the manufacturer, alleging that the plastic container should have had a flame arrestor to prevent the flames from flashing back into the can.The gas can lawsuit was filed on February 17, 2009, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, against Blitz USA, which manufactures a variety of plastic fuel containers.The plaintiffs, A.J. McSwain, Chris Gaddy and Chris Raymond, were all in their 20s when a Blitz portable gas can exploded on February 9, 2008, causing flames and burning gasoline to shoot onto them. As a result of the gas can explosion, the men were left with permanent scarring and debilitating injuries.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe complaint alleges that the gas can was unreasonably dangerous and defectively designed, because it did not contain a safety device known as a flame arrester which would have prevented the flashback of the flames into the gas can and the subsequent explosion.Gas can flame arrestors are an inexpensive safety feature, which usually costs under 50 cents to add to a container. They have small holes within the gas spout, which prevents flames from entering the containier.The “technology” has been around for over 200 years, as they were first used to prevent explosions when coal miners carrying lanterns encountered pockets of gas within the mine. They are currently found on a number of different products, including certain bottles of Bacardi Rum.According to the Southeast Texas Record, Blitz USA participated in a U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) task group on flame arrestors in 2007.In prior gasoline can lawsuits, manufacturers have faced claims over inadequate warnings and design defects for failing to include safety features like flame arrestors, child resistant caps and closures to reduce the risk of spills.In January 2009, the Children’s Gasoline Burn Prevention Act went into effect, requiring all gas cans sold in the United States to contain child resistant caps. The law was enacted in July 2008, to close a loophole in prior legislation involving the sale of containers with flammable liquids.Until the legislation went into effect, many gas can makers were not including the child safety caps, arguing that their cans did not fall under the prior safety laws since they are sold empty. Tags: Burn, Gas Can, Gasoline, Product Liability Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims June 5, 2026 New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit June 5, 2026 Hip Replacement Lawsuit Claims System Failure Caused Woman To Suffer โDusky Metal Diseaseโ June 5, 2026 7 Comments Dan February 19, 2013 I really see what some of you are saying and agree that pouring gas on a fire is dumb. That being said look at the example Muhammad posted should that guys daughter be dead because he was stupid, it’s not like she had her face in the fire she was close to six feet away and the gas can shot flames and gas on her because there was no flame arrestor. My daughter at 17 years old was standing outside with her boyfriend across on the other side of the fire and he decided to pour gas on a fire and she caught on fire because flames shot out of the can on her. Her life has been changed seriously from these actions had the plastic container had a flame arrestor which would have cost the company what a dollar more? this would not have happened to these children and thatโs the point they knew there was a problem and did nothing about it. Katie September 25, 2012 I would like to sue my trash can manufacturer because the container was not reasonably fire proof… Don’t they know that people like to throw things out when they catch on fire? Seriously, flame retardant coatings have been around for years! I would like to sue my auto manufacturer because they didn’t label the vehicle with a warning that said I could get hurt if I crashed into a tree… I would like to sue Doritos because I shoved them in my mouth and a sharp corner cut me… I would like to sue every company that has made any product that I have ever used stupidly and hurt myself with. Do you realize how dumb that argument is? They didn’t have a feature that would make something that it expressly says NOT TO DO a wee bit safer? And now all those people are out of jobs because these kids flunked out of Boy Scouts? Because they thought it would be a good idea to pour gasoline on a fire? How about you get your lazy ass up and get some tinder. Build your fire like a real man, not like an idiot. joni September 5, 2012 where can you purchase a flame arrestor? what store or where on line AJ August 19, 2012 How about not being a dumbass, and not pouring gas on a FIRE!!!! Really?!?! Gas, fire, hmmmm. They don’t exactly mix, now do they? What ever hapen to common sense? What, let’s sue the mfg’s of plates and forks, casue they made me fat! People can be so stupid. The courts are even worse for not recognizing acts of stupidity! muhammed November 12, 2010 my friend is a bout to be charges with homicide when he actually was trying to make the fire bigger and aloud explosion happened burning 90% of his daughter’s body and then she died .. he tried to explain to the detective that he was pouring gas into a small flame in afire pit when suddenly afire ball came out and his daughter who wasn’t far away caught on fire , could the red can be the reason , i mean there was no arresters on the spout of the can . Henry April 28, 2010 Thank you for your kind attention. I see where you are representing some of those who had a burn mishap with a Blitz container. I see where a lot of people are doing the same. I am offering this information in hopes it will help your efforts. I have discovered a serious hazard that these cans pose (I have a sketch describing the condition upon request via email). I have contacted the Blitz company but I was blown off. I have contacted the Consumer Product Safety Commission three times with no response: This is the message that I have been sending: “On Saturday the tenth of April, 2010 I purchased a Blitz USA 5 Gallon Enviro-Flow Gas Can from a Sears Store in Morehead City, NC. When I tried using it I found it to leak profusely from the spout area. Fortunately no fire ensued. When I examined the spout I found that there were three small bleed holes penetrating the wall of the spout. It is definitely an unbelievable design defect. I also found the same style gas can on sale at the Morehead City, NC Lowes Store. Blitz has a number of suits against it for these spouts causing fires but only certain of the Enviro-Flow spouts are mentioned (the 2-3 gallon cans with the green handle, the can I purchased was a 5 gallon and had a black handle. The condition exists on all Enviro-Flow spouts, on whatever size can. These cans are on shelves everywhere, no more than a short drive from wherever you are. If the nozzle has the baffle with the two holes, then the baffle is covering the three leakers I mention. In order to view them from the inside surface of the spout you must remove the valve assembly. From the outside of the spout the holes can be viewed through two holes in the baffle, but the trigger and valve assy. must be removed. These cans are deadly, and Iโm on a search for someone who will do something about it.” If you think about it for a while pouring flammable liquid on a fire (Not bright, but not uncommon either, like squirting a can of fire starter) will cause a flare up but hardly ever will the flame propagate up the stream and into the container to cause an explosion. But see the air cavity that I have described. It will allow flame to enter the cavity containing fuel and fumes, which will cause the can to explode. If you are interested I suggest getting someone with a strong grip and tearing off the handle (to better see into the two holes in the baffle, just below the handle). Then get a pair of diagonal cutters and clip off the retainer restraining the spring. This will free the stem and valve for viewing the interior of the spout where you will see three 1/16″ diameter holes penetrating the wall of the spout and into the cavity, which has two holes for the fuel and fumes to escape to atmosphere.. The handle on the 5 gallon can that I purchased had a black handle and the spout was marked with Model #900900. I hope my information is useful. gunsho11b March 4, 2009 just ordered some good old fashoned Military issue gas cans off of ebay. Tell me Nanny State, what are you going to do about it? Its pretty bad when you cant even buy gas cans in this country without haveing some type of govenment regulation on them. NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates that a woman suffered permanent and debilitating injuries after needing to have a brain tumor surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026) Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (Posted: 2 days ago)Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Lawsuit Claims Eczema Drug Caused Womanโs CTCL Diagnosis (05/28/2026)Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (05/11/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Dupixent Lymphoma Diagnosis Resulted in Multiple Rounds of Chemotherapy (05/01/2026) Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (Posted: 3 days ago)A Nevada woman has filed a lawsuit alleging defects in AngioDynamicsโ port catheters caused her Xcela device to trigger a thrombosis in her right internal jugular vein.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITSmartPort Surgery Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Fractured Inside Womanโs Body (05/15/2026)18 AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuits Will Be Selected for Bellwether Discovery in August 2026 (05/05/2026)AngioDynamics Catheter Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Device Embedded in Jugular Vein, Caused Embolism (04/30/2026)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims June 5, 2026
Hip Replacement Lawsuit Claims System Failure Caused Woman To Suffer โDusky Metal Diseaseโ June 5, 2026
Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit indicates that a woman suffered permanent and debilitating injuries after needing to have a brain tumor surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)Intracranial Meningioma from Depo-Provera Shots Caused Hearing Loss, Vision Loss: Lawsuit (05/12/2026)
Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (Posted: 2 days ago)Regeneron and Sanofi-Aventis face a Dupixent injection lawsuit from a Louisiana woman who says the companies knew about the drug’s risks but downplayed them to doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Lawsuit Claims Eczema Drug Caused Womanโs CTCL Diagnosis (05/28/2026)Link Between Dupixent and Cancer Withheld From Doctors and Users, Lawsuit Alleges (05/11/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Dupixent Lymphoma Diagnosis Resulted in Multiple Rounds of Chemotherapy (05/01/2026)
Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (Posted: 3 days ago)A Nevada woman has filed a lawsuit alleging defects in AngioDynamicsโ port catheters caused her Xcela device to trigger a thrombosis in her right internal jugular vein.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITSmartPort Surgery Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Fractured Inside Womanโs Body (05/15/2026)18 AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuits Will Be Selected for Bellwether Discovery in August 2026 (05/05/2026)AngioDynamics Catheter Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Device Embedded in Jugular Vein, Caused Embolism (04/30/2026)