Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Gas Can Lawsuits July 22, 2008 AboutLawsuits Add Your CommentsManufacturing and design defects common in many portable gasoline containers can result in severe injuries and burns for young children as well as adults. Safer alternative designs and proper warnings could prevent many devastating burns and injuries from spills or gas can explosions.STATUS OF GAS CAN LITIGATION: Lawsuits have been successfully brought against the makers of plastic gas cans, as well as against the retailers who have sold dangerous containers. Despite the litigation, many unsafe gas cans continue to be sold.OVERVIEW: Devastating third degree burn injuries and death are commonly associated with defective gas cans, which often carry five gallons of gasoline and are left in garages and homes, within easy reach of children.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONFailure to warn and design defect lawsuits have been brought against manufacturers of portable gasoline cans. The most common allegations of design defects in plastic gas cans involve:Lack of Child Resistant Gas Can CapsLack of Flame Arrestor in the Gas Can SpoutLack of Closures Which Reduce the Risk of Gas Can SpillsGas Can Caps: Child Resistant ClosuresFor years, makers of plastic gas cans have sold containers which do not contain any child resistant closures. Although the Poison Prevention Packaging Act has required child safety caps on toxic and flammable substances used in and around the home, manufacturers relied on a loophole in the law since their containers are sold empty.In July 2008, the Children’s Gasoline Burn Prevention Act was passed into law, requiring all gas cans sold on or after January 17, 2009 to be sold with child resistant safety caps. However, hundreds of thousands of gas cans are still in homes throughout the United States with these unsafe and defective caps which over 80% of children under the age of 6 are able to quickly open.Young children often attempt to imitate their parents, and most cases involving severe gas burns for kids under 6 stem from situations where they removed the cap and attempted to pour gasoline on a toy mower or their bicycle. As a result of the weight of the 5 gallon gasoline containers, the children often end up covered in gas, and they can suffer severe injuries if the vapors ignite.Child resistant caps generally only cost a few pennies more than standard caps, yet manufacturers have resisted putting the safety caps on the gas cans.Gas Can Spouts: Flame Arrestors and Spillproof ClosuresTwo other inexpensive safety features which many gas cans do not have are flame arrestors and spill proof closures.Flame arrestors are a simple feature, which usually costs under 50 cents to add to a container. They are designed with small holes within the gas can spout, which prevent flames from flashing back into the container. The “technology” has been around for over 200 years, as it was originally designed to prevent explosions when coal miners carrying lanterns entered a pocket of gas within a mine. They are now used in a number of different products, including certain bottles of Bacardi Rum.GAS CAN WARNINGSMany gas can lawsuits filed allege a failure to warn about the dangers associated with the design. In many cases, gas can makers mold the warnings into the side of the container. The small raised letters in the red plastic are often not noticed by users or so difficult to read that they can not reasonably convey information. Tags: Gas Can, Gas Container, Gas Dispenser, Gasoline Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis August 7, 2026 Lawsuit Alleges SteriCare Solution Caused Sepsis, Wrongful Death August 7, 2026 AirTag Lawsuit Claims Apple Tracking Devices Used to Stalk Woman August 7, 2026 3 Comments Larry December 21, 2012 What happened to having parents educate the child on proper use or no use of the gas can without putting 102 people out of work? Might I ask how much money the lawyer is profiting from this case. Looks like lawsuit abuse to me. Parents have to have a large degree of liability when it comes to educating their own children about this dangerous world they choose to live in. Gas Can Lawsuit Filed Over Explosion Caused by Lack of Flame Arrestor : AboutLawsuits.com February 20, 2009 […] gas can lawsuit was filed on February 17, 2009, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, […] Free Market Terrorism September 9, 2008 The best part of this article was its explaining the type of “arrestor” that is often found in “Bacardi bottles”…I believe it is the little plastic device that prevents one from pouring alcohol back into the bottle, if too much is poured out, and I thought that to be its original intent… It is sad that manufacturers are allowed to sell items to unwary consumers that could potentially explode…terrorists are beaten and imprisoned for the same thing, and actually get no monetary rewards from consumers! When will capitalist manufacturers realize that too far is too far, especially where safety and the taking of lives is concerned…between plastics that cause cancer and explode, ceramic vessels that causes poisoning, and many other items sold in markets world wide, ESPECIALLY food from China that kills pets, and other foods that poison humans, shame on the “free market economy”…there is nothing “free” about it, especially the high prices paid for deaths that manufacturers intentionally refused to avoid, and in many cases, intentionally “overlooks”! I hope the price paid in hell for a CARELESS free market economy is “redeemable”!!! CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: yesterday)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026) Lawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (Posted: 2 days ago)An Alabama woman has filed a lawsuit alleging a Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator failed to relieve her chronic pain, instead causing complications that ultimately required surgery to remove the entire system.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026) Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Payout of $88M Awarded in First MDL Bellwether Trial (Posted: 3 days ago)The first Covidien hernia mesh bellwether trial has ended in an $88 million verdict for the plaintiff, who suffered bowel resectioning and revision surgery after his Symbotex hernia mesh failed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITHernia Mesh Failure Lawsuit Alleges ProGrip Implant Was Prone to Breaking and Fragmenting (08/03/2026)Bard Composix Kugel Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Claims Defective Implant Required Bowel Resection (07/27/2026)First Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Trial Over Symbotex Problems To Begin Next Week (07/10/2026)
AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: yesterday)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026)
Lawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (Posted: 2 days ago)An Alabama woman has filed a lawsuit alleging a Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator failed to relieve her chronic pain, instead causing complications that ultimately required surgery to remove the entire system.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)
Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Payout of $88M Awarded in First MDL Bellwether Trial (Posted: 3 days ago)The first Covidien hernia mesh bellwether trial has ended in an $88 million verdict for the plaintiff, who suffered bowel resectioning and revision surgery after his Symbotex hernia mesh failed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITHernia Mesh Failure Lawsuit Alleges ProGrip Implant Was Prone to Breaking and Fragmenting (08/03/2026)Bard Composix Kugel Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Claims Defective Implant Required Bowel Resection (07/27/2026)First Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Trial Over Symbotex Problems To Begin Next Week (07/10/2026)