Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
GSK Settles Zantac Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Ahead of California State Court TrialThe California Zantac lawsuit settlement terms are confidential, and GlaxoSmithKline claims it will continue to defend against other claims over the recalled heartburn medication. June 26, 2023 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsFollowing the dismissal of all claims over it’s recalled heartburn drug brought in the federal court system, GlaxoSmithKline has announced that a settlement was reached to resolve a Zantac bladder cancer lawsuit that was set to go before a jury in a California state court.Zantac (ranitidine) was used by millions of Americans for treatment of heartburn and acid reflux, before it wasย removed from the marketย in late 2019, after it was discovered that the active pharmaceutical ingredient is inherently unstable, and produces high levels of the chemical byproduct N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), which is a potent human carcinogen.Over the past four years, GlaxoSmithKline, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, Sanofi and various other manufacturers, distributors and retailers involved in the sale of brand name or generic ranitidine pills have faced more than 100,000ย Zantac lawsuitsย brought by former users who indicate they have been diagnosed with bladder cancer, esophageal cancer, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, stomach cancer or other injuries,ย as NDMA moved through their body.Stay Up-to-Date AboutZantac LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits, and safety warnings that may impact your family, including any new Zantac lawsuit updates or legal developments. "*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreStay Up-to-Date AboutZantac LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits, and safety warnings that may impact your family, including any new Zantac lawsuit updates or legal developments."*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreGiven common questions of fact and law raised in cases brought throughout the federal court system, the federal Zantac litigation was centralized before Judge Robin L. Rosenberg in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.However, late last year, Judge Rosenberg issued an unexpected ruling, determining that all of the plaintiffsโ expert witnesses were excluded from testifying at trial under federal evidentiary rules. The decision was made following a โDaubertโ hearing, named after a U.S. Supreme Court that defined the requirements for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony under the federal standards for admissibility of causation evidence.While appeals have been filed to challenge Judge Rosenbergโs ruling, the decision has left federal plaintiffs without any means of proving the recalled Zantac pills caused their cancer, and allย Zantac lawsuits pending in the federal court system have been dismissed. However, the federal ruling does not have any impact on lawsuits filed in California and various other state courts, where different standards for the admissibility of expert witness testimony apply.Zantac Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Settlement AnnouncedThe first California state case scheduled to go to trial involved a Zantac bladder cancer claim filed by James Goetz, which was expected to go before a jury on July 24.While the outcome of the trial would not have any binding impact on other claims pending in California, or other state court systems where active litigation is still being pursued after the dismissal of all federal claims, the trial was intended to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the litigation.On June 23, weeks before the case was set to begin, GlaxoSmithKline issued a press release announcing that it has reached a confidential agreement to settle the Zantac lawsuit. However, no details on the settlement agreement have been released.GlaxoSmithKline indicates it did not admit liability in the settlement agreement and continues to plan to defend against future claims.July 2023 Zantac Lawsuit UpdateThere are an estimated 50,000ย Zantac lawsuitsย still pending in state courts nationwide, with other claims expected to go before juries in various different venues later this year, if additional settlements are not reached.While federal plaintiffs are appealing the decision made Judge Rosenberg in the federal court system, other state court judges are expected to weigh in on the reliability of plaintiffs expert witness testimony in the coming months, evaluating the strength and reliability of the plaintiffs evidence establishing that Zantac causes cancer under different state court standards.In addition to cases moving forward to trial in Illinois, Pennsylvania and Nevada, additional California state court Zantac trials are expected to begin later this year as well, with cases previously scheduled to go before juries on August 7, 2023 and October 23, 2023. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Boehringer Ingelheim, Cancer, GlaxoSmithKline, Heartburn, Heartburn Drug, NDMA, New York, Pfizer, Sanofi, Zantac, Zantac RecallMore Zantac Lawsuit Stories Zantac Cancer Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed More Than 5 Years After Recall June 18, 2025 Jury Hears Zantac Cancer Evidence in Illinois Trial Against Boehringer Ingelheim February 5, 2025 Zantac Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Trial Ends With Hung Jury in California November 22, 2024 0 CommentsCompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES $53M Awarded to Families of Babies Who Developed NEC From Similac Special Care Formula (Posted: 2 days ago)A jury has awarded $53 million to four mothers who say their children suffered life-altering NEC injuries from being fed Similac infant formula shortly after being born preterm.MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITEnfamil Lawsuit Claims Premature Infant Required Partial Intestine Removal From NEC Side Effects (03/12/2026)High Levels of Heavy Metals Found in More Than 25 Additional Infant Formulas: Report (03/09/2026)Trial Over Similac Necrotizing Enterocolitis Injuries Underway in Chicago (03/06/2026) Vortex Port Lawsuit Filed After Port Catheter Removed Due to Infection, Blood Clots (Posted: 3 days ago)AngioDynamics faces a Vortex port lawsuit from a woman who says the device only lasted a month before causing an infection and dangerous blood clots in her neck.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Infection Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Defects Caused Sepsis, Pulmonary Embolism (03/23/2026)Chemotherapy Injection Port Lawsuit Blames AngioDynamics SmartPort for Wrongful Death (03/13/2026)Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (03/06/2026) Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (Posted: 4 days ago)A new claim against Boston Scientific joins a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits alleging the systems have failed to relieve pain and instead worsened symptoms for many individuals.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMedtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)
$53M Awarded to Families of Babies Who Developed NEC From Similac Special Care Formula (Posted: 2 days ago)A jury has awarded $53 million to four mothers who say their children suffered life-altering NEC injuries from being fed Similac infant formula shortly after being born preterm.MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITEnfamil Lawsuit Claims Premature Infant Required Partial Intestine Removal From NEC Side Effects (03/12/2026)High Levels of Heavy Metals Found in More Than 25 Additional Infant Formulas: Report (03/09/2026)Trial Over Similac Necrotizing Enterocolitis Injuries Underway in Chicago (03/06/2026)
Vortex Port Lawsuit Filed After Port Catheter Removed Due to Infection, Blood Clots (Posted: 3 days ago)AngioDynamics faces a Vortex port lawsuit from a woman who says the device only lasted a month before causing an infection and dangerous blood clots in her neck.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Infection Lawsuit Claims SmartPort Defects Caused Sepsis, Pulmonary Embolism (03/23/2026)Chemotherapy Injection Port Lawsuit Blames AngioDynamics SmartPort for Wrongful Death (03/13/2026)Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (03/06/2026)
Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (Posted: 4 days ago)A new claim against Boston Scientific joins a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits alleging the systems have failed to relieve pain and instead worsened symptoms for many individuals.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITMedtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)