Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Roblox Lawsuit Families are filing Roblox lawsuits after children were targeted by predators for grooming, sextortion, sexual abuse, or exploitation on the platform. Learn who qualifies, what cases allege, and how to file a confidential claim.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
FDA Ban on Hair Relaxers With Formaldehyde Delayed Again: Reports Formaldehyde health risks have been widely recognized for years, and could directly expose those using hair relaxer to toxic cancer causing chemicals. July 22, 2024 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments A proposal by federal regulators to ban the use of formaldehyde in hair relaxer products, which have been linked to increased cancer risks, has been pushed back to September, according to recently released documents. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) first proposed a ban on formaldehyde in hair relaxer products in October 2023, which would affect both formaldehyde and chemicals that release it, such as methylene glycol. Under the rule, such chemicals would no longer be allowed in hair relaxer products sold in the U.S., which have been widely used by African American and minority women for decades. Originally, the agency indicated the rule was expected to be finalized in April 2024, but the month passed with no word on the final ban, and many products continue be sold as hair relaxers with formaldehyde, which could lead to the development of uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Now, according to a new update on the proposed formaldehyde rule published by the Office of Management and Budget, finalization of the ban has been pushed back to September. No reason for the delay has been provided, but various news agencies report that FDA officials say putting such rules in place takes time, and requires approvals at various levels throughout the agency. Formaldehyde use in hair relaxers has been associated with both short-term and long-term health effects, according to FDA warnings when the proposed rule was first announced, including skin reactions, respiratory problems, and an increased risk of certain types of cancer. Manufacturers such as L’Oreal and Revlon already face thousands of hair relaxer lawsuits brought by women diagnosed with uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries that were allegedly caused by endocrine disrupting chemicals contained in many of the most popular products on the market in the U.S., including Dark & Lovely, Just for Me, ORS Olive Oil Motions, Optimum Care and others. HAIR RELAXER COMPENSATION Did you or a loved one use hair relaxer products? Uterine cancer, endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer may be caused by chemicals in hair relaxer. See if you are eligible for benefits. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION HAIR RELAXER COMPENSATION Did you or a loved one use hair relaxer products? Uterine cancer, endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer may be caused by chemicals in hair relaxer. See if you are eligible for benefits. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Formaldehyde Health Concerns Formaldehyde is an industrial chemical used to make many construction and building materials, paper products and cosmetics. However, exposure to high levels of the chemical can cause serious health problems when inhaled or absorbed through the skin. Short-term exposure to formaldehyde can cause eye irritation if inhaled or allergic reactions if it touches the skin, while longer exposure can result in lung damage, severe eye irritation, reproductive issues, asthma, allergy-related conditions, and even cancer. Health experts have raised concerns about exposure to formaldehyde for years, especially involving workplace environments and certain consumer products. Research published by the American Academy of Neurology in 2021 found that long-term formaldehyde exposure in the course of employment was associated with a 21% higher risk of cognitive impairment, including lower IQ scores and memory loss. In 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found that formaldehyde exposure from the use of industrial products may be associated with rare but serious cancers. The agency indicated that long-term exposure to even low formaldehyde levels could cause nasopharyngeal cancer, sinonasal cancer and myeloid leukemia, which impacts bone marrow and blood cells. As a result of the report, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) limited occupational formaldehyde exposure in the workplace to 0.75 ppm on average over an eight-hour workday, or 2 ppm not exceeding a 15-minute period. In April, the EPA issued a draft evaluation declaring that formaldehyde exposure is an unreasonable risk to human health. July 2024 Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Update As a result of the failure to warn about the risk of cancer from hair relaxers, L’Oreal and other manufacturers now face thousands of product liability lawsuits filed throughout the federal court system. Given common questions of fact and law raised in the complaints, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) established coordinated pretrial proceedings for all hair relaxer lawsuits in January 2023, centralizing the claims before U.S. District Judge Mary Rowland in the Northern District of Illinois. To help gauge the strengths and weaknesses of this evidence, the parties proposed competing draft hair relaxer lawsuit bellwether trial plans in November 2023, which outlined a process for selecting a small group of bellwether cases, which will go through case-specific discovery in preparation for early trial dates. However, the parties have been unable to agree on several key points regarding the bellwether selections, as well as when the first trials should begin, and how big a factor general causation should play in the early phases of the litigation. While the stated intention of bellwether trials is to identify the most representative lawsuits, parties in complex litigation often jockey to make selections that are most beneficial to their side, as the average hair relaxer lawsuit payouts will have a substantial impact on the amount of money the manufacturers may be required to pay to avoid the need for thousands of individual cases to go before separate juries nationwide. Following coordinated discovery in the MDL and any early bellwether trials, if the parties fail to negotiate hair relaxer settlements for individuals diagnosed with uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine fibroids and other complications, Judge Rowland may later remand each individual lawsuit directly filed in the MDL back to the U.S. District Court where it would have originated for a separate trial. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Chemicals, Dark & Lovely, Endometriosis, Formaldehyde, Hair Relaxer, Just for Me, L'Oreal, Ovarian Cancer, Uterine Cancer Image Credit: BearFotos Find Out If You Qualify for Hair Relaxer Compensation More Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Stories MDL Judge To Weigh Hair Relaxer Cancer Evidence in Mid-2026 September 11, 2025 Uterine Cancer Cases Expected to ‘Increase Substantially’ Over Next 30 Years: Study July 8, 2025 Link Between Hair Relaxers and Cancer To Be Examined by Court During “Science Day” July 3, 2025 0 Comments URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Dupixent Cancer Risks Outlined in User Stories, as Evidence Mounts of T-Cell Lymphoma Link (Posted: today) Dupixent users are coming forward with accounts of devastating cancer diagnoses, saying the popular eczema drug masked early warning signs of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. As the FDA investigates and the first lawsuit is filed, researchers warn Dupixent may unmask or accelerate hidden cancers, raising urgent questions about its long-term safety. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over T-Cell Lymphoma Diagnosis (10/02/2025)Dupixent Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Warning Label Update Being Evaluated by FDA (09/15/2025)Dupixent T-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuits May Follow Recent Studies Linking Drug to Cancer Risks (09/04/2025) Lawsuits Over Vision Loss From Ozempic, Mounjaro Should Be Sent to New MDL Judge, Plaintiffs Argue (Posted: yesterday) Plaintiffs involved in GLP-1 vision loss lawsuits are calling for the litigation to be consolidated in New Jersey federal court, and not be bundled with existing stomach paralysis litigation. MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITReports of ‘Ozempic Teeth’ Raise Concerns Over Dry Mouth Side Effects Linked to GLP-1s (10/03/2025)Study Raises New Questions Over Ozempic Hair Loss Risks (09/26/2025)Mounjaro Side Effects Led to Emergency Surgery, Lawsuit Alleges (09/24/2025) Over 1,300 Depo Shot Lawsuits Now Being Pursued by Women With Meningioma Tumors (Posted: 2 days ago) A federal judge has called for more coordination between state and federal courts handling Depo shot lawsuits claiming the contraceptive causes brain tumors. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit Describes Left-Sided Numbness, Tingling Before Diagnosis (10/01/2025)Judge To Hear Depo-Provera Lawsuit Preemption Arguments on Monday (09/26/2025)Link Between Depo-Provera and Meningioma Brain Tumors Ignored by Pfizer, Plaintiffs Indicate (09/22/2025)
Dupixent Cancer Risks Outlined in User Stories, as Evidence Mounts of T-Cell Lymphoma Link (Posted: today) Dupixent users are coming forward with accounts of devastating cancer diagnoses, saying the popular eczema drug masked early warning signs of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. As the FDA investigates and the first lawsuit is filed, researchers warn Dupixent may unmask or accelerate hidden cancers, raising urgent questions about its long-term safety. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over T-Cell Lymphoma Diagnosis (10/02/2025)Dupixent Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Warning Label Update Being Evaluated by FDA (09/15/2025)Dupixent T-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuits May Follow Recent Studies Linking Drug to Cancer Risks (09/04/2025)
Lawsuits Over Vision Loss From Ozempic, Mounjaro Should Be Sent to New MDL Judge, Plaintiffs Argue (Posted: yesterday) Plaintiffs involved in GLP-1 vision loss lawsuits are calling for the litigation to be consolidated in New Jersey federal court, and not be bundled with existing stomach paralysis litigation. MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITReports of ‘Ozempic Teeth’ Raise Concerns Over Dry Mouth Side Effects Linked to GLP-1s (10/03/2025)Study Raises New Questions Over Ozempic Hair Loss Risks (09/26/2025)Mounjaro Side Effects Led to Emergency Surgery, Lawsuit Alleges (09/24/2025)
Over 1,300 Depo Shot Lawsuits Now Being Pursued by Women With Meningioma Tumors (Posted: 2 days ago) A federal judge has called for more coordination between state and federal courts handling Depo shot lawsuits claiming the contraceptive causes brain tumors. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit Describes Left-Sided Numbness, Tingling Before Diagnosis (10/01/2025)Judge To Hear Depo-Provera Lawsuit Preemption Arguments on Monday (09/26/2025)Link Between Depo-Provera and Meningioma Brain Tumors Ignored by Pfizer, Plaintiffs Indicate (09/22/2025)