Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
FDA Ban on Hair Relaxers With Formaldehyde Delayed Again: ReportsFormaldehyde health risks have been widely recognized for years, and could directly expose those using hair relaxer to toxic cancer causing chemicals. July 22, 2024 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsA proposal by federal regulators to ban the use of formaldehyde in hair relaxer products, which have been linked to increased cancer risks, has been pushed back to September, according to recently released documents.The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) firstย proposed a ban on formaldehyde in hair relaxer products in October 2023, which would affect both formaldehyde and chemicals that release it, such as methylene glycol. Under the rule, such chemicals would no longer be allowed in hair relaxer products sold in the U.S., which have been widely used by African American and minority women for decades.Originally, the agency indicated the rule was expected to be finalized in April 2024, but the month passed with no word on the final ban, and many products continue be sold as hair relaxers with formaldehyde, which could lead to the development of uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries.Now, according to a new update on the proposed formaldehyde rule published by the Office of Management and Budget, finalization of the ban has been pushed back to September. No reason for the delay has been provided, but various news agencies report that FDA officials say putting such rules in place takes time, and requires approvals at various levels throughout the agency.Formaldehyde use in hair relaxers has been associated with both short-term and long-term health effects, according to FDA warnings when the proposed rule was first announced, including skin reactions, respiratory problems, and an increased risk of certain types of cancer.Manufacturers such as LโOreal and Revlon already face thousands ofย hair relaxer lawsuitsย brought by women diagnosed with uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries that were allegedly caused by endocrine disrupting chemicals contained in many of the most popular products on the market in the U.S., including Dark & Lovely, Just for Me, ORS Olive Oil Motions, Optimum Care and others.HAIR RELAXER COMPENSATIONDid you or a loved one use hair relaxer products?Uterine cancer, endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer may be caused by chemicals in hair relaxer. See if you are eligible for benefits.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONHAIR RELAXER COMPENSATIONDid you or a loved one use hair relaxer products?Uterine cancer, endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer may be caused by chemicals in hair relaxer. See if you are eligible for benefits.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONFormaldehyde Health ConcernsFormaldehyde is an industrial chemical used to make many construction and building materials, paper products and cosmetics. However, exposure to high levels of the chemical can cause serious health problems when inhaled or absorbed through the skin.Short-term exposure to formaldehyde can cause eye irritation if inhaled or allergic reactions if it touches the skin, while longer exposure can result in lung damage, severe eye irritation, reproductive issues, asthma, allergy-related conditions, and even cancer.Health experts have raised concerns about exposure to formaldehyde for years, especially involving workplace environments and certain consumer products. Research published by theย American Academy of Neurologyย in 2021 found that long-term formaldehyde exposure in the course of employment was associated with aย 21% higher risk of cognitive impairment, including lower IQ scores and memory loss.In 2022, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency found that formaldehyde exposure from the use of industrial products may beย associated with rare but serious cancers. The agency indicated that long-term exposure to even low formaldehyde levels could cause nasopharyngeal cancer, sinonasal cancer and myeloid leukemia, which impacts bone marrow and blood cells.As a result of the report, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) limited occupational formaldehyde exposure in the workplace to 0.75 ppm on average over an eight-hour workday, or 2 ppm not exceeding a 15-minute period.In April, the EPA issued a draft evaluation declaring that formaldehyde exposure is an unreasonable riskย to human health.July 2024 Hair Relaxer Lawsuits UpdateAs a result of the failure to warn about theย risk of cancer from hair relaxers, LโOreal and other manufacturers now face thousands of product liability lawsuits filed throughout the federal court system. Given common questions of fact and law raised in the complaints, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML)ย established coordinated pretrial proceedings for all hair relaxer lawsuitsย in January 2023, centralizing the claims before U.S. District Judge Mary Rowland in the Northern District of Illinois.To help gauge the strengths and weaknesses of this evidence, the parties proposed competingย draftย hair relaxer lawsuit bellwether trial plansย in November 2023, which outlined a process for selecting a small group of bellwether cases, which will go through case-specific discovery in preparation for early trial dates. However, the parties have been unable to agree on several key points regarding the bellwether selections, as well as when the first trials should begin, and how big a factor general causation should play in the early phases of the litigation.While the stated intention of bellwether trials is to identify the most representative lawsuits, parties in complex litigation often jockey to make selections that are most beneficial to their side, as the average hair relaxer lawsuit payouts will have a substantial impact on the amount of money the manufacturers may be required to pay to avoid the need for thousands of individual cases to go before separate juries nationwide.Following coordinated discovery in the MDL and any early bellwether trials, if the parties fail to negotiate hair relaxer settlements for individuals diagnosed withย uterine cancer, endometrial cancer, ovarian cancer, uterine fibroids and other complications, Judge Rowland may later remand each individual lawsuit directly filed in the MDL back to the U.S. District Court where it would have originated for a separate trial. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Chemicals, Dark & Lovely, Endometriosis, Formaldehyde, Hair Relaxer, Just for Me, L'Oreal, Ovarian Cancer, Uterine Cancer Image Credit: BearFotos Find Out If You Qualify for Hair Relaxer CompensationMore Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Stories First Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit Set for Bellwether Trial on Sept. 7, 2027 September 28, 2026 L’Oreal Faces State AG Lawsuit Over Cancer Risks From Hair Relaxers September 15, 2026 L’Oreal Execs To Face More Questions Over Dark and Lovely, Hair Relaxer Cancer Risks June 29, 2026 0 Comments LinkedInThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Dupixent Lawyers Seek Leadership Positions in MDL Over Cancer Risks (Posted: today)Plaintiffs propose that about a dozen attorneys be appointed to leadership positions in the growing Dupixent cancer litigation.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Side Effects Lawsuit Alleges Drug Caused Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (09/24/2026)Dupixent Side Effects Caused CTCL, Tumors, Lawsuit Alleges (09/10/2026)Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (08/20/2026) Lawyers Preparing 35 Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits in Core Discovery Pool (Posted: yesterday)Nearly three dozen Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits are being prepared for early test trials, involving the deposition of plaintiffs who say they suffered tooth loss as a result of using the opioid addiction treatment.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Manufacturer Faces Nearly 18,000 Dental Erosion Lawsuits (07/09/2026)Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (06/18/2026)Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026) Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (Posted: 2 days ago)A Texas woman’s Boston Scientific SCS implant lawsuit claims she spent several years with a broken device in her back, but did not remove it because the company’s sales representatives said it just needed reprogramming.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)Boston Scientific Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Numbness, Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction (09/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (09/10/2026)
Dupixent Lawyers Seek Leadership Positions in MDL Over Cancer Risks (Posted: today)Plaintiffs propose that about a dozen attorneys be appointed to leadership positions in the growing Dupixent cancer litigation.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Side Effects Lawsuit Alleges Drug Caused Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (09/24/2026)Dupixent Side Effects Caused CTCL, Tumors, Lawsuit Alleges (09/10/2026)Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (08/20/2026)
Lawyers Preparing 35 Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits in Core Discovery Pool (Posted: yesterday)Nearly three dozen Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits are being prepared for early test trials, involving the deposition of plaintiffs who say they suffered tooth loss as a result of using the opioid addiction treatment.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Manufacturer Faces Nearly 18,000 Dental Erosion Lawsuits (07/09/2026)Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (06/18/2026)Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (Posted: 2 days ago)A Texas woman’s Boston Scientific SCS implant lawsuit claims she spent several years with a broken device in her back, but did not remove it because the company’s sales representatives said it just needed reprogramming.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)Boston Scientific Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Numbness, Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction (09/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (09/10/2026)