Skip Navigation

Eligible for a Hair Relaxer lawsuit?

MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations

MDL Judge Issues New Deadlines for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trial Preparations

A federal judge says she expects to select three lawsuits by the beginning of April 2026, which parties will prepare for the first early “bellwether” trials, to test the strength of evidence that chemicals in widely used hair relaxer products have caused women to develop uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries.

Cosmetics manufacturers like L’Oreal, Revlon and Strength of Nature face more than 11,000 hair relaxer lawsuits filed nationwide, each alleging that the manufacturers failed to provide warnings of cancer risks linked to chemical straighteners like Just for Me, Dark & Lovely and Optimum.

The litigation began after publication of a 2022 National Institutes of Health (NIH) study, which warned that women using chemical hair straighteners more than four times a year faced double the risk of uterine cancer than those who did not. 

Additional research has linked certain ingredients commonly used in the products, such as phthalates, parabens and formaldehyde-releasing agents to hormonal disruption and tumor growth in reproductive tissues.

In response to a wave of lawsuits being filed after the release of the NIH study, a hair relaxer lawsuit multidistrict litigation (MDL) was formed in the Northern District of Illinois in 2023, with U.S. District Judge Mary Rowland appointed to preside over coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.

Last May, the Judge directed the parties to select a group of 32 hair relaxer lawsuits to serve as bellwether cases, which are being prepared for a series of early trial dates in the MDL. These trials are designed to give plaintiffs and defendants a sense of how juries are likely to respond to evidence and testimony that would be repeated throughout the litigation.

Over the past year, lawyers have been conducting depositions and case specific discovery in those bellwether cases, and there has been disagreement between the parties over when the court should schedule the first hair relaxer MDL trial.

Following a status conference last week, the court issued minutes (PDF) on January 29, outining a series of key deadlines needed to prepare the first claims for trial.

All fact discovery for the 32 initial cases in the bellwether pool must be completed by March 18, 2026, and the parties have been asked to submit position papers that same day, identifying 12 of the 32 cases they believe should be eligible to serve as bellwether trials.

Judge Rowland indicates that she will then select three claims by April 1, from which plaintiffs will choose one case that will be prepared for trial by April 6, followed by the defendants selecting another case by April 10.

The Court will then select a second group of three potential bellwether cases by April 15, with plaintiffs choosing one of those cases by April 24, and defendants will select another by April 30.

Additional fact discovery for the claims selected for bellwether trials will close on June 10, 2026. Previous schedules for hair relaxer lawsuits have indicated that the first bellwether trials will not likely be ready until mid-2027.

While the results of the bellwether trials will not be binding on other cases, they will be closely watched, as the outcomes could help the parties reach a hair relaxer lawsuit settlement agreement. If no such agreement is reached, Judge Rowland is likely to remand the claims back to their originating districts for individual trial dates.

To stay up to date on this litigation, sign up to receive hair relaxer lawsuit updates sent directly to your inbox.

Written By: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A federal judge has put in place additional procedures to address the deaths of women suffering from cancer who are pursuing hair relaxer lawsuits, allowing estates and families to take up their claims.
As legal sports betting expands nationwide, research and emerging lawsuits suggest that young men face disproportionate risks from mobile sportsbook apps that combine constant access, gamified design and aggressive promotional tactics, potentially accelerating patterns of gambling addiction and financial harm.
Plaintiffs are asking a federal panel to consolidate a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits against Abbott and Boston Scientific, alleging defective design changes caused lead fractures, device failures and neurological injuries nationwide.