Heart Scan Side Effects Could Raise Cancer Risk: Study

|

Canadian researchers indicate that they have found a direct correlation between heart imaging scans and an increased risk of cancer, with the risk growing in proportion to the amount of radiation a patient has received from the scans.

Every 10 milli Sieverts (mSv) a year received by a patient from heart imaging scans raises the risk of cancer by about 3%, according to researchers from Montreal, Quebec. The findings of their study were published online last week by the Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ).

Resarchers looked at an administrative database of 82,861 patients who suffered a heart attack between April 1996 and March 2006. They found that 77% of those patients received either a cardiac imaging scan or a therapeutic procedure that involved subjecting the heart to low-dose ionizing radiation during the first year after their heart attack. In most cases, the radiation exposure was about 5.3 mSv per patient-year.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

A total of 12,020 cancer incidents were discovered among the patients during the follow-up period. Researchers determined that there was dose-dependant relationship between the amount of radiation exposure from the heart imaging scans and the likelihood that the patient would develop cancer that equated to about 3% increased risk for every 10 mSv of low-dose ionizing radiation.

The researchers said that the findings raise questions as to whether health care professionals should back off on the heavy use of low-dose ionizing radiation scans. At a minimum, the researchers concluded that a system should be put in place that tracks the cumulative amount of radiation exposure received by a patient, so that their health care professionals can weigh that information when determining whether a heart imaging scan is the best course of action.


0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Cartiva is urging federal judges to reject consolidation of toe-implant lawsuits, arguing that an MDL would interfere with individual claim resolutions that the company says are already being handled efficiently outside of court.
The first Covidien Symbotex mesh bellwether has been restored to the 2026 trial calendar, signaling renewed momentum in a litigation where more than 2,000 similar claims are still awaiting resolution.
In the first federal trial over claims of Uber driver sexual assaults, a lawsuit involving the rape of a passenger will go before a jury on January 13.