Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Drug-Coated Heart Stents No More Effective Than Non-Coated Counterparts: Study December 14, 2020 Martha Garcia Add Your CommentsThe findings of new research suggests heart stents coated with the drug paclitaxel are no more effective at preventing patient death than non-coated stents.In a study published last week in the New England Journal of Medicine, Swedish researchers report they found the death risk was the same for both types of stents.Researchers conducted an unplanned early analysis of the Swedish Drug Elution Trial in Peripheral Arterial Disease (SWEDEPAD); a multi-center, randomized clinical trial focusing on patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) and whether drug-coated heart stents reduced mortality rates.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe findings showed an increased risk of death linked to paclitaxel-coated devices, including heart stents and angioplasty balloons, so another early analysis was conducted to determine if there was a risk.A total of 2,289 patients were randomly assigned to treatment with paclitaxel-coated devices or with uncoated devices. Paclitaxel is a drug commonly used to treat cancer but is also approved for other uses as well.During a 2.5 year follow-up, nearly 600 patients died. Roughly 25% were in the paclitaxel-coated stent group and 24% were in the uncoated group.The findings of the study showed no difference in death risk between the two groups, paclitaxel-coated device group or non-coated group.At the one year follow-up, the all-cause death risk was 10.2% in the paclitaxel-coated device group and 9.9% in the uncoated device group.There was no significant difference in the risk of increased death between the treatment groups with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Those with limb-threatening ischemia in the coated group had an increased risk of 33.4% and those in the uncoated group 33.1%.There was also no major difference between the two groups among those with intermittent claudication. The risk was 10.9% in the coated group and 9.4% in the uncoated group.Peripheral artery disease is a health condition caused by reduced blood flow to the lower limbs caused by obstructive atherosclerosis. Paclitaxel is a drug that is also approved for use on drug-coated balloons and stents for PAD patients.โIn this randomized trial in which patients with peripheral artery disease received treatment with paclitaxel-coated or uncoated endovascular devices, the results of an unplanned interim analysis of all-cause mortality did not show a difference between the groups in the incidence of death during 1 to 4 years of follow-up,โ the researchers concluded. Written by: Martha GarciaHealth & Medical Research WriterMartha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers. Tags: Blood Clots, Drug Eluting Stent, Heart StentMore Lawsuit Stories Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot June 18, 2026 Nexgrill Class Action Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Botched Grill Brush Recall June 18, 2026 RAEV E-Bike Lawsuit Claims Battery Fire Caused $1.6M in Property Damage June 18, 2026 0 Comments CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (Posted: 3 days ago)Five plaintiffs say they all suffered dental problems due to the side effects of Suboxone, which could have been avoided with adequate warnings.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026) Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: 4 days ago)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 5 days ago)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)
Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot June 18, 2026
Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (Posted: 3 days ago)Five plaintiffs say they all suffered dental problems due to the side effects of Suboxone, which could have been avoided with adequate warnings.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)
Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: 4 days ago)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 5 days ago)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)