Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Hernia Mesh Case Cleared For First Bellwether Trial Involving Lawsuit Over Bard Ventralight ST, Including Punitive Damages September 3, 2020 Austin Kirk Add Your Comments The U.S. District Judge presiding over all federal hernia mesh lawsuits filed against C.R. Bard has determined that the first bellwether case can proceed to trial, after denying the manufacturers motion for summary judgment and attempt to prevent the jury from awarding punitive damages over problems with the Ventralight ST product. C.R. Bard currently faces more than 8,000 product liability claims brought throughout the federal court system, each involving similar claims that defective polypropylene mesh products were sold in recent years, including Bard Ventralight, Bard Ventralex, Bard Perfix, Bard 3DMax and other similar mesh systems. Plaintiffs allege the design problems with the polypropylene mesh caused severe abdominal pain, infections, adhesions, erosion and other complications often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the failed hernia patch. Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Did you or a loved one receive a hernia mesh? Hernia mesh lawsuits are being filed against Bard, Atrium, Covidien and several other hernia mesh manufacturers over mesh failures resulting in injuries and additional surgery. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Did you or a loved one receive a hernia mesh? Hernia mesh lawsuits are being filed against Bard, Atrium, Covidien and several other hernia mesh manufacturers over mesh failures resulting in injuries and additional surgery. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Given common questions of fact and law raised in the complaints, the federal litigation has been centralized before U.S. District Judge Edmund A. Sargus in the Southern District of Ohio for the past few years, where the parties have engaged in coordinated discovery in preparation for a series of early trial dates, which are intended to help gauge how juries are likely to respond to certain evidence and testimony that will be repeated throughout the claims. A Bard hernia mesh case filed by Steven Johns has been selected for the first “bellwether” trial, involving allegations that he suffered painful and debilitating complications from Ventralight mesh that featured a biorsorbable coating called Sepra Technology (“ST”), which covered the polypropylene mesh material. With the trial set to begin in January 2021, C.R. Bard made last ditch attempts to have the case dismissed, with several motions for summary judgment and requests that the court exclude crucial expert testimony in support of the plaintiffs claim. However, Judge Sargus denied most of the company’s requests, clearing the way for the case to go before a jury. In an evidentiary motions order (PDF) issued on September 1, Judge Sargas rejected Bard’s attempt to completely exclude plaintiff’s expert witnesses from testifying at trial, determining that several of the opinions offered are based on sufficiently sound science for the jury to consider. In a separate dispositive motions order (PDF) issued the same day, the Court did grant the manufacturers motions for summary judgment regarding manufacturing defect claims and allegations under the Consumer Sales Practices Act. Judge Sargas also determined that claims related to a subsequent recurrent hernia, and resulting injuries and treatment, could not be pursued. However, the plaintiff is still able to proceed with the bulk his claims, including those related to design defects, failure to warn, negligent misrepresentation, breach of implied and express warranty, as well as punitive damages. Bard attempted to prevent the jury from considering punitive damages, which may substantially increase the amount of any award, since they are intended to punish bad behavior by defendants and deter similar conduct in the future. However, Judge Sargas has determined the evidence in this case may warrant such punitive damages. “[A]t this juncture, Plaintiff has presented sufficient evidence to establish genuine issues of fact exist as to whether Bard’s ‘intentionally fraudulent conduct’ or displayed ‘knowing and reckless indifference,’” according to the order. “Specifically, there are genuine issues of fact as to whether Bard misrepresented or concealed information regarding the timing of the resorption of the ST and the substantial risks associated with such early resorption — such as the exposure of bare polypropylene to the visceral organs — that could lead a jury to conclude they acted willfully or recklessly.” While the Johns trial was previously expected to begin in May, when the COVID-19 pandemic emerged in the United States, the start of that bellwether case was postponed until September 29, 2020. However, following a recent status conference, the parties and Court agreed it is necessary to delay the trial date again, and it is now expected to begin in January 2021. While the outcome of this case will not be binding on other Bard cases, it may have a substantial impact on any hernia mesh settlements Bard may offer to avoid thousands of individual trials being set for trial nationwide in the coming years. Tags: Bard, Bard Ventralight, C. R. Bard, Hernia, Hernia Mesh, Kugel, Ventralex, Ventralight Image Credit: | More Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Stories Deadline for Covidien Mesh Settlement Negotiations Extended Until Jan. 2026 August 21, 2025 LifeCell Seeks Dismissal of Strattice Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Set for Trial August 11, 2025 Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Remain on Track for Feb. 2026 Trial Date July 31, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermX/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Wayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (Posted: 3 days ago) In March 2026, a jury is scheduled to hear a Wayfair fire pit lawsuit from a woman who suffered burns to nearly half her body. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITAmazon Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Alleges ‘Flame-Jetting’ Caused Third Degree Burns (08/29/2025)Tabletop Fire Pit Burn Victims Share Stories of Explosions and Devastating Injuries (08/21/2025)Colsen Fire Pit Lawsuit Involving Severe Burn Injuries Suffered by a Child Set for Trial Next Year (08/14/2025) Dupixent T-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuits May Follow Recent Studies Linking Drug to Cancer Risks (Posted: 4 days ago) Dupixent lawsuits are now being investigated after studies and FDA reports link Dupixent (dupilumab) to cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Side Effects May Increase Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Risks (08/26/2025) Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Significantly Increased Among Women Over 31: Study (Posted: 5 days ago) A new study appears to further confirm and quantify the risks of Depo-Provera meningioma side effects, potentially providing further evidence for growing litigation. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITPfizer Seeks Dismissal of Depo-Provera Failure-To-Warn Lawsuits Over Meningioma Risks (09/02/2025)Nearly 1,000 Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawsuits Filed, With Another 9,500 Under Investigation (08/25/2025)Experts Weigh In On Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Risks, As Lawsuits Continue to Mount (08/20/2025)
Wayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (Posted: 3 days ago) In March 2026, a jury is scheduled to hear a Wayfair fire pit lawsuit from a woman who suffered burns to nearly half her body. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITAmazon Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Alleges ‘Flame-Jetting’ Caused Third Degree Burns (08/29/2025)Tabletop Fire Pit Burn Victims Share Stories of Explosions and Devastating Injuries (08/21/2025)Colsen Fire Pit Lawsuit Involving Severe Burn Injuries Suffered by a Child Set for Trial Next Year (08/14/2025)
Dupixent T-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuits May Follow Recent Studies Linking Drug to Cancer Risks (Posted: 4 days ago) Dupixent lawsuits are now being investigated after studies and FDA reports link Dupixent (dupilumab) to cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Side Effects May Increase Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (CTCL) Risks (08/26/2025)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Significantly Increased Among Women Over 31: Study (Posted: 5 days ago) A new study appears to further confirm and quantify the risks of Depo-Provera meningioma side effects, potentially providing further evidence for growing litigation. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITPfizer Seeks Dismissal of Depo-Provera Failure-To-Warn Lawsuits Over Meningioma Risks (09/02/2025)Nearly 1,000 Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawsuits Filed, With Another 9,500 Under Investigation (08/25/2025)Experts Weigh In On Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Risks, As Lawsuits Continue to Mount (08/20/2025)