Hernia Mesh Cases Filed at Rapid Rate Over Complications With Bard, Ethicon and Atrium Products

|

The number of hernia mesh lawsuits filed throughout the federal court system continues to grow at a rapid rate, with more than 1,000 new product liability complaints filed over the past month involving problems associated with Bard, Ethicon and Atrium implants.

According to the latest docket report (PDF) issued by the U.S. Judicial Panel for Multidistrict Litigation (JPML), as of June 19 there are currently 2,478 Bard hernia mesh cases, 2,167 Ethicon Physiomesh cases and 1,403 Atrium C-Qur mesh cases pending in three separate consolidated proceedings established in the federal court system.

As lawyers continue to review and file additional complaints for individuals who have experienced complications with hernia mesh products manufactured and sold by the companies, the number of cases is expected to continue to rise from the current total of 6,048 claims against the three manufacturers.

Is there a hernia mesh lawsuit? Find out if you qualify for a hernia mesh lawsuit settlement payout.
Is there a hernia mesh lawsuit? Find out if you qualify for a hernia mesh lawsuit settlement payout.

Each of the complaints involve similar allegations, indicating that hernia mesh implants used in recent years were defectively designed, unreasonably dangerous, and prone to failure, migration, and infections, often resulting in recurrent hernias and the need for revision surgery.

Given similar questions of fact and law raised in the complaints filed in the federal court system against each of the manufacturers, the JPML has consolidated all Atrium C-Qur cases before U.S. District Judge Landya McCafferty in New Hampshire; all Ethicon Physiomesh lawsuits before U.S. District Judge Richard Story in the Northern District of Georgia; and all cases against C.R. Bard before U.S. District Judge Edmund A. Sargus in the Southern District of Ohio.

In addition to the federal litigation, hernia mesh cases have been filed against the manufacturers in various state courts nationwide, with large numbers pending in Rhode Island, New Jersey and Pennsylvania.

As part of the coordinated pretrial proceedings in the federal court system, each of the presiding judges has established a “bellwether” process, where a small group of representative claims are being prepared for early trial dates again each manufacturer.

While the outcomes of these “bellwether” trials will not be binding on other cases, the process is designed to help gauge how juries may response to certain evidence and testimony that is likely to be repeated in thousands of individual cases, and potentially facilitate hernia mesh settlements that would avoid the need for each individual case to be remanded back to U.S. District Courts nationwide for a separate trial date.


0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case.
An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe.
Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer.