Hip Replacement Surgical Device Recalled Due Amid Sterilization Concerns

Irvin Jackson

Add Your Comments

A recall has been issued for about 3,000 medical devices found in operating rooms nationwide, which are commonly used during hip replacement surgery, but may not be sterile, posing a risk of severe and life-threatening infections. 

The FDA announced a Standard Offset Cup Impactor recall on December 16, indicating that the devices may not have been adequately sterilized. The hip implant surgical tools are provided as non-sterile, and must be sterilized before use during surgery. However, the action was taken after it was determined that the devices failed sterility testing after being sterilized in a dedicated instrument case.

The recall has categorized as Class I by the FDA, meaning that continued use of the device carries a risk of severe injury or death. However, there have been no reports of hip infections linked to these devices.

Do You Know about…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More
SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Do You Know About…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More
SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

The Standard Offset Cup Impactors are handheld medical devices used in hip joint replacement surgeries. They are used to implant cups into the hip socket.

Even if a hospital attempts to sterilize the hip surgery device according to the provided instructions, patients may be exposed to a risk of infection.

The recall affects 2,906 Greatbatch Medical Standard offset Cup Impactors with POM-C Handles, with model numbers T6318; T7821; T8042; T8043; T8044; T8088; T8143; T8177; T8184; T8333; T8468; T8487; T9196; T9316; T9348; T9360; T9747; T9894; T9954; T9955; T10243; T10281; T10287;T10600; T10491; T10753; T10861; T11209; T11340; T11506; T12230; T12699; T12861; T13344; T13480; T13642; T13722; T14384; T15311; T15752; T15949; T16427; T16611; T16661; T16934; T17203; T17238; T17321; T17650; and T17703. They were distributed from July 30, 2004, to December 22, 2015, and manufactured from January 2004 through December 2013. The devices were distributed worldwide.

The FDA indicates that Greatbatch has developed new sterilization procedure recommendations, which include individually wrapping the tools during sterilization processing. The company has sent out letters with the updated instructions to its customers.

Customers with questions can contact Greatbatch medical by calling 1-619-498-9487, or by sending an email to FieldActionCenter@greatbatch.com.

Adverse events or reactions should be reported to the FDA’s MedWatch adverse event reporting program.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Tags: Greatbatch, Hip Infection, Hip Replacement, Hospital Infection, Infection, Medical Device Recall

More Lawsuit Stories

1 Comments

Lawrence
Had hip surgery 2016., got MRSA, subsequently had 6 more surgeries and still have a draining wound. How can I find out the numbers for the recalled instruments used?

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Judge Says Suboxone 'Schedule A' Lawsuits Should Be Filed Individually or Dismissed
Two years after allowing thousands of incomplete Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits to be submitted due to statutes of limitation laws, a federal judge says those cases should be filed individually or dismissed.
JPML Sets Hearing Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Consolidation For May 28
In late May, a panel of federal judges will hold oral arguments over whether all federal spinal cord stimulator lawsuits should be consolidated before one judge for pretrial proceedings.
Fire Pit Burn Lawsuits Mount as CPSC Issues Warning Over New Flame Jetting Injuries, Death
As the number of lawsuits over tabletop fire pits continues to grow, the CPSC has issued a warning indicating that despite a consumer’s death linked to one product, the manufacturer has not agreed to remove the devices from the market.