Hotels Oppose Centralization of Lawsuits Over Sex Trafficking

Although a growing number of sex trafficking lawsuits are being filed throughout the federal court system against various different major hotel chains, the industry is opposing a recent request to consolidate the cases before one judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

In recent months, about two dozen nearly identical claims have been brought against the operators of Hilton, Marriott, Wyndham, Best Western, Red Roof Inn and other popular hotels, alleging that the desire for profits was placed before human misery, by failing to enact and enforce standards and procedures that would have prevented sex traffickers from openly using their rooms and facilities, often involving minor children.

Plaintiffs allege that it has been obvious to hotel operators that sex trafficking was happening on their properties, yet they failed to take any steps to stop the practices.

Given similar questions of fact and law presented in lawsuits filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide, a motion was filed last month that seeks to centralize the hotel sex trafficking lawsuits as part of a federal MDL, or multidistrict litigation.

In various responses filed in opposition to the request last week, the hotel operators argue that the claims should be handled individually, due to the specific situations under which each sex trafficking incident occurred.

In one opposition brief filed by the Hilton franchise (PDF), the hotel chain argues that there is no common cause or injuries in the different claims.

“Each underlying case arises from a distinct alleged scheme perpetrated by different traffickers at different hotels across the country,” the brief states. “The cases do not allege an industry-wide conspiracy to engage in sex trafficking.”

Another brief submitted by Wyndam Hotels & Resorts, Inc. (PDF) argues that the plaintiffs have not demonstrated common questions of fact, and that consolidating the would be problematic.

Similar briefs were filed by the Best Western, Marriott, Inter-Continental, Choice and Red Roof Inn hotel chains.

There are currently at least 23 sex trafficking cases filed against hotel operators, which are pending 12 different U.S. District Courts, which is likely to lead to duplicative discover into common issues and conflicting pretrial schedules. In addition, the problem is likely to be compounded in the coming months and years, as lawyers representing plaintiffs indicate that there are approximately 1,500 additional hotel sex trafficking claims being investigated by their firms.

In a hearing order (PDF) issued on December 19, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation scheduled oral arguments on the motion for January 30, at the Sam M. Gibbons United States Courthouse in Tampa, Florida.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Women are sharing alarming reports of pain, infections, and reconstruction failures caused by internal bra mesh implants like GalaFLEX, as the FDA confirms these devices were never approved for breast surgery and lawsuits now allege manufacturers failed to warn about the risks.
A federal judge will hold a hearing on Thursday with hair relaxer lawsuit parties in order to update the court on the status of the ongoing litigation.
Parties involved in Uber sexual assault lawsuits report ongoing negotiations in an effort to reach a potential settlement agreement to resolve more than 3,500 claims in federal and state courts.