Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
CPSC Infant Sleep Product Standards Now In Effect to Prevent Suffocations, DeathsInfant sleep products inclining greater than 10 degrees are now banned in the United States, to reduce the risk of infant suffocations and deaths July 5, 2022 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsFollowing recalls which have impacted millions of infant sleep products, due unreasonable risks of entrapment and potentially deadly suffocations, federal safety officials have passed several new rules which will set a maximum allowable incline on all infant sleep products sold in the United States.The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced that new safety standards for bassinets and cradles went into effect on June 23, requiring any infant sleep products have a sleep angle of no more than 10 degrees, in addition to requiring that all products conform to the existing crib, play yard, and bassinet standards.Inclining infant sleepers and bassinets have been introduced by several companies, to elevate the babyโs head and torso, claiming it helps prevent acid-reflux and congestion. However, the design has proven to be deadly after babies are old enough to rollover on their own, or if the incline of the bassinet forces the childโs chin down to his or her neck, creating an airway blockage.As part of an ongoing effort to minimize the risk of deaths and injuries associated with the use of bassinets and cradles, the CPSC has enacted new mandatory standards for inclined infant sleepers, which were published in the Code of Federal Regulations at 16 CFR Part 1218.The new rules now prohibits the sale of any infant sleep product with an incline greater than 10 degrees, and also requires all infant sleep products to go through a more stringent stability test procedure. The CPSC stated any products marketed for sleep such as inclined sleepers, travel or compact basinets or in-bed sleepers may no longer be marketed or sold for sleeping purposes.โAs a parent, I know there is nothing more important than the safety of our children,” CPSC Chair Alex Hoehn-Saric said. “I am pleased to announce this new safety standard will protect our most vulnerable population, babies.โDo You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONInclined infant sleeper safety concerns first emerged in April 2019, when the CPSC issued a Fisher-Price Rockโn Play warning, instructing consumers to stop placing their infants in the sleepers by three months old, or before they begin to show signs that they can roll over independently. The warning was issued after the CPSC publicly recognized at least 32 infant deaths related to the products.Following the warning, several manufacturers issued recalls of inclined sleeper products in April 2019, includingย Fisher-Priceโs recall of 4.7 million Rockโn Play Sleepers, Fischer-Priceโs recall of 71,000 Ultra-Lite Day & Night Play Yards and aย recall of 694,000 Kids II inclined rocking sleepers. Two years later, in 2021, aย 4-in-1 Rock โn Glide Soother recallย was issued after four reported infant fatalities associated with its use.The repeated injuries and infant lives lost due to these rockers resulted in theย Safe Sleep for Babies Act, which passed in May 2022, making it illegal to manufacture, sell, or distribute crib bumpers or inclined sleepers for infants in the United States. As of June 23, those the new mandatory requirements are now in effect.According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), aboutย 4,000 infants annually die unexpectedly during sleepย from accidental suffocation, sudden infant death syndrome, or unknown causes. Many of the reported fatalities are a result of suffocation from rolling on their sides or stomach.To reduce suffocation and accidental deaths, the American Academy of Pediatrics recommends infants sleep on their backs positioned on a firm, empty surface, not containing any soft objects toys, pillows or loose bedding. The recommendations call for new parents to always follow the ABCs of safe sleep: Alone on the Back in a bare Crib. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Fisher-Price, Inclined Sleeper, Infant, Infant Death, SuffocationMore Lawsuit Stories Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit September 10, 2026 Dupixent Side Effects Caused CTCL, Tumors, Lawsuit Alleges September 10, 2026 LG Electric Range Lawsuit Alleges Defective Controls Caused House Fire September 10, 2026 0 Comments CompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday)A South Carolina woman alleges an Abbott spinal cord stimulator malfunction caused painful electrical shocks that required removal surgery less than two years after implantation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (09/04/2026)Judge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026) Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: 2 days ago)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026) Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (Posted: 3 days ago)An Ozempic NAION lawsuit blames the diabetes drug for a woman’s sudden loss of vision and alleges the manufacturer failed to warn doctors of the risks.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic NAION Lawsuit Filed Over Sudden, Permanent Vision Loss (08/03/2026)Link Between NAION and Ozempic, Wegovy Will Be Focus of Early Discovery in GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuits (07/16/2026)Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges (06/16/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit September 10, 2026
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday)A South Carolina woman alleges an Abbott spinal cord stimulator malfunction caused painful electrical shocks that required removal surgery less than two years after implantation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (09/04/2026)Judge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026)
Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: 2 days ago)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)
Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (Posted: 3 days ago)An Ozempic NAION lawsuit blames the diabetes drug for a woman’s sudden loss of vision and alleges the manufacturer failed to warn doctors of the risks.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic NAION Lawsuit Filed Over Sudden, Permanent Vision Loss (08/03/2026)Link Between NAION and Ozempic, Wegovy Will Be Focus of Early Discovery in GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuits (07/16/2026)Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges (06/16/2026)