Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Lawsuit Indicates Instant Pot Pro Crisp Pressure Cooker Exploded Scalding Hot ContentsThe product liability lawsuit claims the pressure cooker forcefully ejected scalding hot contents when safety features failed to prevent the lid from being removed while contents were pressurized July 26, 2022 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsDespite a number of advanced “safety” features touted in marketing material, a Tennessee man indicates in a recently filed lawsuit that he suffered severe burn injuries when an Instant Pot Pro Crisp Multi-Use Pressure Cooker and Air Fryer forcefully ejected scalding hot contents onto his body.The complaint (PDF) was filed by Otniel Ulloa in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee on July 21, alleging that the Instant Pot is unreasonably dangerous and failed to prevent the lid from being removed while there was still built-up pressure and steam inside the cooker.Instant Pots pressure cookers have been widely marketed over the past decade as a safe and effective kitchen appliance, suggesting that using the modern electronic device is “everyday magic”, and indicating that advanced safety mechanisms overcome traditional problems with pressure cookers exploding. However, Ulloa joins a growing number of consumers now pursuing lawsuits after their pressure cooker exploded, when the safety features failed.PRESSURE COOKER LAWSUITSWere you injured by an exploding pressure cooker?Faulty and defective designs may cause a pressure cooker to explode, resulting in severe burns and injuries.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONPRESSURE COOKER LAWSUITSWere you injured by an exploding pressure cooker?Faulty and defective designs may cause a pressure cooker to explode, resulting in severe burns and injuries.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONAccording to the lawsuit, the long list of safety features promoted by the manufacturer included a “safety lid lock”, which was supposed to automatically lock the lid when the cooker is pressurized, as well as “lid position detection”, which was supposed to prevent the cooker from pressurizing when the lid was not in a safe position.In promotional videos, Ulloa indicates the manufacturer claimed that consumers “don’t need to be afraid of it” and could use their Instant Pot with confidence, “knowing that it is not going to explode.” However, that is exactly what happened while Ulloa was using the pressure cooker to prepare a meal.Ulloa bought an Instant Pot Pro Crisp Multi-Use Pressure Cooker and Air Fryer on Amazon.com in March 2021. While using the pressure cooker in August of that same year, he opened the lid believing that the internal pressure had all been released, and was sprayed with the scalding hot contents inside the cooker.“[Instant Pot] pressure cookers possess defects that make them unreasonably dangerous for their intended use by consumers because the lid can be rotated and opened while the unit remains pressurized,” according to the complaint. “Further, Defendant’s representations about “safety” are not just misleading, they are flatly wrong, and put innocent consumers like Plaintiff directly in harm’s way.”Pressure Cooker Explosion LawsuitsModern electronic pressure cookers have become increasingly popular in recent decades, amid the introduction of products like Instant Pot, Crock-Pot, Ninja Foodi and others, which were promoted aggressively promoted on social media, websites and home shopping stations.Most of the problems involve similar pressure cooker burn injuries which occurred after the lid was removed while the contents were still under high pressure, typically resulting in burns covering a large percentage of the userโs body. However, other injuries linked to pressure cookers have included eye injuries, broken bones and other complications that resulted from electrocutions, spills or explosions.As more of these electric pressure cookers have been introduced in recent years, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has issued several pressure cooker recalls over problems where lids were able to be opened while contents are under pressure, allowing hot contents to be expelled and causing a scald or burn injury to individuals in the immediate area. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Burns, Explosion, Instant Pot, Pressure Cooker Image Credit: |More Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Stories Crock-Pot Express Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Alleges Defective Lid Caused Severe Burn Injuries September 9, 2026 Nesco Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Claims Safety Defects Caused Serious Burn Injuries August 31, 2026 Instant Pot Explosion Lawsuit Claims Defective Pressure Cooker Lid Caused Disfiguring Burns August 20, 2026 0 Comments CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (Posted: today)A South Carolina woman alleges an Abbott spinal cord stimulator malfunction caused painful electrical shocks that required removal surgery less than two years after implantation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (09/04/2026)Judge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026) Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: yesterday)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026) Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (Posted: 2 days ago)An Ozempic NAION lawsuit blames the diabetes drug for a woman’s sudden loss of vision and alleges the manufacturer failed to warn doctors of the risks.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic NAION Lawsuit Filed Over Sudden, Permanent Vision Loss (08/03/2026)Link Between NAION and Ozempic, Wegovy Will Be Focus of Early Discovery in GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuits (07/16/2026)Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges (06/16/2026)
Crock-Pot Express Pressure Cooker Lawsuit Alleges Defective Lid Caused Severe Burn Injuries September 9, 2026
Instant Pot Explosion Lawsuit Claims Defective Pressure Cooker Lid Caused Disfiguring Burns August 20, 2026
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (Posted: today)A South Carolina woman alleges an Abbott spinal cord stimulator malfunction caused painful electrical shocks that required removal surgery less than two years after implantation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (09/04/2026)Judge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026)
Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: yesterday)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)
Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (Posted: 2 days ago)An Ozempic NAION lawsuit blames the diabetes drug for a woman’s sudden loss of vision and alleges the manufacturer failed to warn doctors of the risks.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic NAION Lawsuit Filed Over Sudden, Permanent Vision Loss (08/03/2026)Link Between NAION and Ozempic, Wegovy Will Be Focus of Early Discovery in GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuits (07/16/2026)Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges (06/16/2026)