Invokana Foot Amputation Results in Lawsuit Over Failure to Disclose Risk

|

A Texas man has filed a product liability lawsuit, alleging that he needed a foot amputation due to the prescription of Invokana for treatment of his diabetes, indicating that the drug makers failed to adequately disclose the large number of amputation problems with Invokana reported by users nationwide.

The complaint (PDF) was filed late last month by Michael W. Mayfield, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, indicating that Johnson & Johnson and its Janssen Pharmaceuticals subsidiary failed to adequately warn patients and the medical community about the increased risk of leg and foot amputations linked to Invokana.

“Defendants knew of the significant risk of severe injury caused by ingestion of Invokana. However, Defendants did not warn or did not adequately and sufficiently warn consumers, including Plaintiff, or the medical community of the severity of such risks,” Mayfield’s lawsuit states. “To the contrary, Defendants conducted nationwide sales and marketing campaigns to promote the sale of Invokana and willfully deceived Plaintiff, his/her health care professionals, the medical community, and the general public as to the health risks and consequences of the use of Invokana.”

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

Mayfield was prescribed Invokana in February 2015, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. However, in June 2017, he had to undergo a transmetatarsal amputation of the right foot, and then two days later had to undergo a guillotine amputation of the right foot above the ankle.

the lawsuit notes that a number of studies in recent years have led to a growing laundry list of Invokana side effects, which should have been known before the drug was placed on the market.

In December 2015, the FDA required Johnson & Johnson to add newย diabetic ketoacidosis warnings to Invokana, indicating that the medication increases the risk of this serious condition, which typically results in the need for emergency treatment to avoid life-threatening injury. Prior to the update, the Invokana warnings failed to alert consumers about the importance of seeking immediate medical attention if they experience symptoms like abdominal pain, fatigue, nausea, respiratory problems or vomiting.

In June 2016, the FDA required additional label warnings about the link betweenย ย Invokana and kidney risks, indicating that the medication may increase the risk of acute kidney injury and other severe health problems.

More recently, in May 2017, the FDA required anย Invokana warning update regarding the risk of leg and foot amputation, which manufacturers of other similar diabetes drugs claim is a unique risk with Invokana.

The lawsuit filed by Mayfield will be consolidated with otherย Invokana lawsuitsย pending in the federal court system, which are currently consolidated for pretrial proceedings before one judge in New Jersey. Following coordinated discovery and any bellwether trials held to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that is likely to be repeated throughout the litigation, ifย Invokana settlementsย or another resolution for the claims is not reached, Mayfield’s case and hundreds of others may later be remanded back to U.S. District Courts nationwide for individual trial dates.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

In a joint statement, plaintiffs and defendants in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits have laid guidelines for what types of cases should be selected to serve as potential bellwether trials.
Women who experienced infection, chronic inflammation, implant instability or other complications after internal bra mesh procedures are now questioning whether those risks were fully disclosed before implantation.
More than 3,300 women have filed Depo-Provera lawsuits in federal court, with several hundred more also pending in state courts in New York and Delaware, according to a recent status report.