Skip Navigation

CooperSurgical Reaches Settlement in Embryo Destruction Class Action Lawsuit

CooperSurgical Reaches Settlement in Embryo Destruction Class Action Lawsuit

A settlement has reportedly been reached between CooperSurgical and couples whose embryos were destroyed due to damage caused by the company’s recalled LifeGlobal IVF culture media, which was used at certain fertility clinics.

As part of the in vitro fertilization (IVF) process, embryos are typically placed in a culture media that promotes and supports development through the blastocyst stage, before it is implanted back into a woman’s body to be carried to term.

LifeGlobal IVC Culture Media Recall

In late 2023, CooperSurgical announced a LifeGlobal IVC culture media recall. In its notice, the company indicated that the product was destroying embryos instead of helping them grow, dashing the hopes of couples hoping to have children and significantly increasing an already costly fertility treatment.

This has led to dozens of CooperSurgical IVF culture media lawsuits being filed over the last couple years, each raising similar allegations that indicate the company manufactured and distributed a defective product that was unreasonably dangerous for the embryos. The filings also claim CooperSurgical failed to warn prospective parents or the clinics that their fertilized embryos could be destroyed, making them unusable.

CooperSurgical-IVF-Class-Action-Lawsuit
CooperSurgical-IVF-Class-Action-Lawsuit

CooperSurgical Settlement

A settlement was announced on May 5 in an order to dismiss (PDF) the existing lawsuits once the agreement is finalized. It resolves a LifeGlobal IVC culture media recall class action lawsuit filed in March 2024, which sought to represent individuals who experienced embryo loss due to the allegedly defective culture media.

The agreement follows a decision by the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to reject a motion by plaintiffs seeking to centralize all CooperSurgical culture media lawsuits before one judge for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings. That motion, filed in June 2024, indicated there were at least 30 CooperSurgical culture media lawsuits pending in federal courts nationwide.

However, the panel found that formal consolidation was unnecessary, determining that informal coordination between the parties and various courts was sufficient to manage the litigation.

U.S. District Judge Jon S. Tigar issued the dismissal order, which did not include any details about the settlement terms. The deal was presented to Judge Tigar last Friday, and he noted that the lawsuit could be reinstated within three months if the settlement is not completed.

“This order will be vacated if any party, after meeting and conferring with opposing parties, files a notice that settlement has not occurred within 90 days of the date of this order.”

– U.S. District Judge Jon S. Tigar, Northern District of California

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.

Irvin Jackson
Written By: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Women nationwide have begun filing GalaFLEX breast mesh lawsuits against BD, claiming they suffered pain, permanent injuries and the need for revision surgery after the implants were used off-label for breast reconstruction.