JUUL Labs Tried To Addict Children To “Most Toxic Of All Substances”, Lawsuit Claims

Another lawsuit has been filed against the makers of JUUL e-cigarettes, alleging the company should be required to reimburse a local school district for costs associated with its ongoing battle against teen JUUL nicotine addictions, and indicating that the company intentionally marketed its vaping products to create a new generation of nicotine addicts.

Menifee County Public Schools filed the complaint (PDF) against JUUL Labs, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on July 21, saying the company “mined the middle and high school environments” in an effort to make life-long customers out of children, despite the health risks of nicotine and despite the fact that such efforts are illegal.

JUUL is a popular e-cigarette, which was just introduced in 2015, but quickly become the most widely used vaping product among teens, following years of aggressive marketing directed to minors and prior non-smokers. The addictive JUUL pods are designed to look like USB drives, allowing students to hide their vaping habit from teachers, parents and other adults.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

The company recruited thousands of on-line, social media “influencers” to market JUULing toward teens, according to the complaint, which indicates the resulting rampant use of JUUL among teenagers has forced school districts to assign significant resources to combat the problem.

“Nicotine is one of the most toxic of all poisons. Nicotine is also one of the most addicting agents,” the Kentucky school district’s lawsuit notes. “JUUL successfully created a misleading impression that JUUL products were intended for youth and healthy.”

Menifee County Public Schools joins a growing number of other school districts which have filed lawsuits in recent months, alleging that the JUULing trend was predictable, avoidable, likely intentional, and claiming the problem has cost schools nationwide as they battle to counsel addicted youths, put measures in control to fight the spread of vaping among their students, and deal with the fallout.

Facing mounting pressure and even criminal investigations, JUUL has ended advertising in the U.S. and removed nearly all of its flavored products from the market.

As a growing number of product liability and class action complaints continued to be filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide, a panel of federal judges decided to consolidate all JUUL nicotine addiction lawsuits before Judge William H. Orrick III in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, which is where JUUL Labs, Inc.’s San Francisco headquarters are located.

As JUUL addiction lawyers continue to review and file claims in the coming months, the litigation is expected to continue to grow, and is likely to encompass tens of thousands of complaints.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

$1.1 Billion Philips CPAP Settlement Reached to Resolve Cancer, Personal Injury Claims
$1.1 Billion Philips CPAP Settlement Reached to Resolve Cancer, Personal Injury Claims (Posted today)

Philips has agreed to pay $1.1 billion to resolve all Philips CPAP personal injury and medical monitoring lawsuits after receiving final approval on another deal to resolve class action economic loss claims as well.

Lawyers Urge Talcum Powder MDL Judge To Reconsider Decision Requiring Full Refiling of Daubert Challenges
Lawyers Urge Talcum Powder MDL Judge To Reconsider Decision Requiring Full Refiling of Daubert Challenges (Posted today)

The U.S. District Judge overseeing talcum powder cancer lawsuits has been asked by plaintiffs to reconsider a ruling last month to allow a second set round of hearings to examine the applicability of expert testimony, which they say would further delay the litigation.