Skip Navigation

Litigation Over LINX Surgery Problems Underway in Lawsuit Against Acid Reflux Device Manufacturer

Discovery Into LINX Surgery Problems Underway in Lawsuit Over Acid Reflux Device Failure

A federal judge has established the pretrial schedule for a LINX surgery lawsuit filed earlier this year, setting key litigation deadlines that will move the case toward a March 2028 trial.

Michael Lopez brought the LINX procedure lawsuit in the District of Minnesota on January 19, indicating he had to undergo additional surgery after the controversial acid reflux implant failed and had to be surgically removed.

Designed by Torax Medical, the LINX Reflux Management System was approved in 2017 for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and has since been acquired by Johnson & Johnsonโ€™s Ethicon subsidiary. The implant consists of a small ring of magnetic beads connected by titanium wires, which is placed around the lower esophageal sphincter to help keep stomach acid from washing back into the esophagus.

While the implant was marketed as a safe alternative for patients who did not respond to proton pump inhibitors, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced a LINX Reflux Management System recall in 2018, after noting that certain devices suffered from a manufacturing defect that could allow the wire to break and the beads to detach inside of a patientโ€™s body, potentially migrating and damaging nearby organs or causing other serious health problems. This frequently leads to patients undergoing more LINX surgical procedures to have the failed implant removed.

Lopez is just one of several patients now pursuing LINX surgery lawsuits, each alleging the devices broke inside their bodies, leaving them with devastating injuries after the devices failed. The complaints claim the manufacturer knew or should have known about the design defects, indicating they either failed to test the device properly or failed to provide adequate warnings about the risks of breakage.

LINX-Reflux-Device-Lawsuit-Lawyer
LINX-Reflux-Device-Lawsuit-Lawyer

LINX Device Failure Lawsuit

According to Lopezโ€™s complaint, he underwent the LINX procedure in December 2018. At that time, he was unaware the implant had been recalled several months earlier, and neither he nor his doctor were made aware the device had been removed from the market, indicating the manufacturers failed to provide proper recall notices.

The lawsuit presents claims of manufacturing defect, negligence and negligence per se, seeking compensatory damages.

In March, U.S. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Cowan Wright issued a pretrial scheduling order (PDF) in the case, announcing that she intends for the lawsuit to be trial-ready by March 22, 2028. The trial is expected to last three days.

The order includes details on protecting and preserving evidence and calls for fact discovery to be completed by June 24, 2027. All expert discovery, including depositions, will be completed by September 22, 2027. Dispositive motions are due by November 22, 2027.

While the order also indicates that the court may schedule settlement conferences to see if there is a way to resolve Lopezโ€™s claims without need for a trial, no such conference has yet been ordered or set.

LINX Surgery Lawsuits

Following the LINX device recall in the U.S., the manufacturer also pulled LINX implants from certain foreign markets in September 2025, as concerns about the implants breaking continued to rise.

LINX surgery attorneys are currently reviewing additional LINX injury claims and pursuing compensation for patients who experienced complications, including:

  • The need for revision surgery or removal of the device
  • Device breakage or mechanical failure
  • Migration of the implant
  • Organ punctures or tissue damage

Sign up for more legal news that could affect you or your family.

Irvin Jackson
Written By: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES