Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Long-Term Plavix Use Increase Death Risk, But Lowers Stent Heart Risks November 17, 2014 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments The findings of a new study suggest that continuing use of blood thinners, such as Plavix or Effient, for more than 30 months after placement of a stent may decrease the risk of heart attacks and blood clots when compared to only using the drugs for the currently recommended one-year period. However, federal investigators warn that those taking Plavix may face an increased overall risk of death with longer use. The FDA issued a drug safety communication on November 16, highlighting the findings of recent trial data on the use of antiplatelet blood-thinning therapy in combination with drug-eluting coronary heart stents. Although long-term use of the blood thinners was found to reduced the risk of side effects associated with stent placement, which may cause blood clots to develop on the stents and potentially break free, traveling to the heart or lungs, the study found that use of Plavix for two and a half years, instead of just one year, may increase the risk of patients dying. Learn More About Plavix Lawsuits Lawsuits over Plavix filed for bleeding, ulcers other health problems. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Plavix Lawsuits Lawsuits over Plavix filed for bleeding, ulcers other health problems. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The FDA’s announcement came the same day that the study, the Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT) trial, was published in the New England Journal of Medicine. The study was conducted by researchers from around the world, including from Harvard Medical School in Boston, the Imperial College in London, Universite Paris Diderot, in Paris, as well as Duke University, Stanford and others. It was sponsored by a number of drug manufacturers, including Abbott, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Daiichi Sankyo, and Cordis. The research was done on the behest of the FDA, involving nearly 10,000 patients who had taken aspirin along with drugs belonging to a class of antiplatelet blood thinners called thienopyridines for a year after receiving heart stents to battle heart congestion. The class includes Plavix, Effient and Ticlid. After a year on the drugs, all participants in the study were told to continue taking the drugs for another 18 months, but some were given the real thing and others were given a placebo. Researchers found that taking the drugs had a significant benefit on preventing stent thrombosis, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events; in some case cutting the risks in half. However, the researchers also found that about 2% of the patients who kept taking the drugs for a total of 30 months died, compared to only 1.5% of those taking a placebo. Prolonged use of the drugs also significantly increased the bleeding risks. “Dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after placement of a drug-eluting stent, as compared with aspirin therapy alone, significantly reduced the risks of stent thrombosis and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events but was associated with an increased risk of bleeding,” the researchers concluded. “An unexpected finding was that the number of deaths from any cause during the treatment period was higher in the group that continued to receive thienopyridine than in the group that received placebo, a difference that was driven by an increase in the number of deaths from noncardiovascular causes in the thienopyridine group.” The FDA analysis of the findings indicate that the deaths appeared to be related to an increase in trauma and cancer deaths, and only appeared among patients given Plavix. The agency does not know how the drug could be connected with the deaths, and noted that increases in non-cardiovascular death have not been reported in previous large trials involving Plavix. However, the agency concluded that the benefits of taking the drugs for long-term therapy after receiving a heart stent outweighed the risks, but its review of the findings are ongoing. Plavix Effectiveness Concerns Plavix (clopidrogrel) is a blockbuster medication that has been used by millions of people in the United States and is commonly prescribed to prevent blood platelets from sticking together and forming clots. There are between 2.5 million and 3 million Plavix prescriptions handed out each month in the U.S. In recent years, some concerns have emerged about the potential side effects of Plavix and whether many of these prescriptions may have been unnecessary due to genetic resistance to the medication. While Plavix has been promoted as being better at its job than aspirin, with a cost that is many times higher than aspirin, questions have been raised about the effectiveness of Plavix for many patients and whether it actually provides any benefit over aspirin. In August 2009, researchers from the University of Maryland identified a gene variant found in about one-third of the population that may signal a reduced effectiveness of Plavix. People with the CYP2C19 variant have reduced functioning of a liver enzyme that is supposed to convert Plavix from its inactive form to its active form, potentially making Plavix ineffective at reducing the risk of blood clots. Unnecessary use of Plavix may expose individuals to an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, severe ulcers, a rare blood disorder known as thrombotic thrombocytopenic pupura (TTP) and other injuries. Bristol-Myers Squibb and Sanofi-Aventis currently face hundreds of Plavix injury lawsuits filed in state and federal courts throughout the United States, alleging that the drug makers have placed their desire for profits before the safety of consumers by aggressively marketing the medication while failing to adequately warn consumers or the medical community about the health risks associated with the medication. In 2013, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) centralized all Plavix cases filed in the federal court system before U.S. District Judge Freda L. Wolfson in the District of New Jersey for coordinated handling during pretrial proceedings. Tags: Blood Thinners, Bristol Myers Squibb, Drug Eluting Stent, Effient, Plavix, Sanofi-Aventis More Plavix Lawsuit Stories Long-term Plavix and Aspirin Use Increase Gastrointestinal Injury Risks: Study November 29, 2023 Plavix Use During Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation Increases Bleeding Risks: Study April 7, 2020 Short Term Plavix and Aspirin Therapy May Increase Risk Of Heart Attacks: Study March 16, 2018 11 Comments Bonnie January 30, 2024 my husband has been dx with Parkinsons/ Lewy body disease. He was placed on Plavix for a long er period of time bec ause the Dr said why take him off now. ” He is doing fine ” He has since developed Parkinsons/ Lewy body disease and because he was told to stay on Plavix for a longer period of time then usual I am connecting his current problem with prolonged use of Plavix. Any comments would be appreciated Linda November 12, 2023 I was taking Brillinta for a year after having a stent implant due to heart attack. I have switched from Brilinta to Plavix and have been taking it daily for a year. my question is can Plavix cause severe joint pain? Evelena July 14, 2023 I have been taking Plavix for 17 years my arms and legs have bruising issues , my arms especially look like they have been beaten on as the bruising has made them completely covered with blue and purple splotches and they are very sensitive to touch. I was taking Eliquis for a while until I was bleeding from my eyes.I have stopped taking Eloquis since and feel Plavix must be stopprd also. Susan February 23, 2022 I’ve been on plavix for 16 straight years and have never had a problem Stephen June 29, 2019 I’ve had 2 strokes.Also I have 100 percent blockage in my right carotid artery in my neck.I think I’ve been mis diagnosed in my past leading to my second stroke. But I’m not a doctor either. Sheila March 1, 2019 I have been hospitalized numerous times with pancreatitis and had stents put in and removed 2 or 3 times. I was told to stop placid while going through these procedures. Since I have been off the Plavix awhile no more Pancreatitis. I could have died, worse pain ever. Dee November 20, 2017 Dear Kandi, Below is a list of some serious side effects from Plavix: Tell your doctor if you have serious side effects of Plavix including: •bleeding that will not stop; •bloody or tarry stools, blood in your urine; •coughing up blood or vomit that looks like coffee grounds; •chest pain or heavy feeling, pain spreading to the arm or shoulder, nausea, sweating, general ill feeling; •sudden numbness or weakness, especially on one side of the body; •sudden headache, confusion, problems with vision, speech, or balance; •pale skin, weakness, fever, or jaundice (yellowing of the skin or eyes); •unusual bleeding (nose, mouth, vagina, or rectum), or •purple or red pinpoint spots under your skin. If your Dr. is unaware this can happen and is giving you the run around, run away from him and get a new Dr. Good luck! justin July 30, 2017 unlikely KANDI October 20, 2016 I HAVE A QUESTION THAT I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO GET ANY MEDICAL DR.I HAVE ASKED TO RESPOND TO.PROBABLY MANY MORE QUESTIONS.I HAD BEEN FOUND 100% BLOCKAGE OVER A YEAR AND HALF AGO,HAD GROIN STENTS IN BOTH GROINS,PLACED ON PLAVIX AND AN ASPRIN.SINCE THEN,I HAVE BEEN HAVING MORE INCIDENTS OF BLOOD IN MY URINE,A CYST FOUND IN ONE,PAIN IN KIDNEYS, NOW BLOOD IN MY STOOLS.WHEN I ASKED THE DR’S OR TRIED THEY SAY,”UNLIKELY” THE PILLS ARE THE ISSUE.SO NOW,I HAVE JUST BEEN TOLD AFTER MTHS OF DR’S KNOWLEDGE OF THESE ISSUES,MY KIDNEYS CAN NOT TAKE ANTI INFLAMMATORIES WHICH I NEED FOR OTHER BIG HEALTH ISSUES NOR BLOOD THINNERS.WAITING ON ANOTHER DR TO DECIDE WHAT TO DO.I’M BEING SENT TO A UROLOGIST FOR BLOOD IN URINE.COULD PLAVIX AND ASPRIN COMBINED FOR THIS LONG BE THE REAL ISSUE?? IT DOESN’T ALWAYS TAKE 2 YEARS FOR ANY SIDE EFFECT OF ANYTHING,I HAVE FOUND.THANK YOU IF YOU COULD SUGGEST SOMETHING AT THIS POINT.I DO NOT KNOW WHERE TO GO. Jeff June 16, 2016 I have been off and on with Plavix for many many years. What I have found is that i can only take it for about 6 months anymore (and at a low dose) before getting terrible side effects that i personally diagnosed after much research as Vegus nerve damage or at least many of the symptoms of that. It effects my gastro, breathing and heart (flutters and left shoulder pain associated) as well as stabbing pains in muscles, I now have been switching between plavix for 6 months and effient for about 3 months( effient has it’s own nasty side effects over time) as it seems to allow my body to heal from the side effects from each over time. My heart doctor is furious with me but what i cannot get through to him is what is the point in living if i am curled up in a ball of pain form the drug supposedly keeping me alive? Michael October 22, 2015 I’very been on Plavix since 2010, after my 3rd heartattack due to radiation therapy in 1984 for non Hodgkins lymphoma. I’ve been hospitalized 3 times for bleeding and a bleeding ulser, and now have to take pantoprisol every day.I have 9 stents,my liver enzymes are always high, I’m 56 years old and feel like I’m 75, but all in all am in good health. Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES 6 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials in Federal MDL (Posted: today) A federal judge has identified the six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that will serve as the first bellwether trials, to test allegations that the port catheters were defectively designed. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITCourt Indicates Bard PowerPort MDL Bellwether Lawsuits Should Include 3 Infection, 2 Thrombosis and 1 Fracture Case (05/06/2025)Lawyers Proposed 11 Bard Implantable Port Catheter Lawsuits as Bellwether Trial Candidates (04/30/2025)Bard PowerPICC Intravascular Catheter Leaks Linked to Reports of Serious Injuries: FDA (04/21/2025) MDL Judge Orders Paraquat Lawsuit Settlement Update By June 11, 2025 (Posted: 3 days ago) A federal judge has agreed to stay all case-specific discovery deadlines in Paraquat lawsuits, while the parties work to hammer out a settlement agreement to resolve thousands of claims. MORE ABOUT: PARAQUAT PARKINSON’S DISEASE LAWSUITSParaquat Settlement Reached for Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Filed in MDL (04/16/2025)Appeals Court Urged To Reinstate Paraquat Lawsuits Previously Set for Bellwether Trials (02/14/2025)Paraquat Lawsuits Over Parkinson’s Disease Risk Set for Trial in October 2025, April 2026 (01/29/2025) Court Outlines Requirements for Depo-Provera Lawsuit Proof of Use, Type of Meningioma Tumor (Posted: 4 days ago) As new Depo-Provera lawsuits continue to be filed, the judge presiding over the litigation has established key criteria for establishing proof of Depo-Provera use and medical documentation confirming a meningioma diagnosis. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo Shot Lawsuit Filed Over Serious Brain Tumor Injuries (05/07/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera Migraines, Headaches Led to Meningioma Brain Tumor Diagnosis (05/01/2025)Depo-Provera Hearing Loss Lawsuit Filed Over Brain Tumor Side Effects (04/22/2025)
Plavix Use During Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Implantation Increases Bleeding Risks: Study April 7, 2020
6 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials in Federal MDL (Posted: today) A federal judge has identified the six Bard PowerPort lawsuits that will serve as the first bellwether trials, to test allegations that the port catheters were defectively designed. MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITCourt Indicates Bard PowerPort MDL Bellwether Lawsuits Should Include 3 Infection, 2 Thrombosis and 1 Fracture Case (05/06/2025)Lawyers Proposed 11 Bard Implantable Port Catheter Lawsuits as Bellwether Trial Candidates (04/30/2025)Bard PowerPICC Intravascular Catheter Leaks Linked to Reports of Serious Injuries: FDA (04/21/2025)
MDL Judge Orders Paraquat Lawsuit Settlement Update By June 11, 2025 (Posted: 3 days ago) A federal judge has agreed to stay all case-specific discovery deadlines in Paraquat lawsuits, while the parties work to hammer out a settlement agreement to resolve thousands of claims. MORE ABOUT: PARAQUAT PARKINSON’S DISEASE LAWSUITSParaquat Settlement Reached for Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Filed in MDL (04/16/2025)Appeals Court Urged To Reinstate Paraquat Lawsuits Previously Set for Bellwether Trials (02/14/2025)Paraquat Lawsuits Over Parkinson’s Disease Risk Set for Trial in October 2025, April 2026 (01/29/2025)
Court Outlines Requirements for Depo-Provera Lawsuit Proof of Use, Type of Meningioma Tumor (Posted: 4 days ago) As new Depo-Provera lawsuits continue to be filed, the judge presiding over the litigation has established key criteria for establishing proof of Depo-Provera use and medical documentation confirming a meningioma diagnosis. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo Shot Lawsuit Filed Over Serious Brain Tumor Injuries (05/07/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera Migraines, Headaches Led to Meningioma Brain Tumor Diagnosis (05/01/2025)Depo-Provera Hearing Loss Lawsuit Filed Over Brain Tumor Side Effects (04/22/2025)