Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
L’Oreal Gets FDA Warning Over Skin Care Product Marketing Practices March 3, 2015 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsGovernment health officials have sent a warning letter to LโOreal USA, indicating that the company is improperly marketing two of its skin care products by suggesting that they are intended for medical purposes, which would classify the products as drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.ย The FDA issued a warning letter to L’Oreal USA on February 12, informing the company that the advertising of โRosalic AR Intenseโ and โMela-D Pigment Controlโ are in violation of federal law by promoting medical benefits that have not been established or approved by the drug regulatory agency.The warning letter requests that L’Oreal stop marketing the skincare products with language that makes them sound like drugs, by suggesting that the products affect the structure or any function of the human body.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONโRosalic AR Intenseโ and โMela-D Pigment Controlโ are promoted on the manufacturerโs website using language that indicates the products are intended to cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent diseases, the FDA letter indicates. According to the FDA, the language and application examples displayed on L’Orealโs website for the products imply they affect the structure or function of the human body, which classifies the products as โnew drugsโ under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Under this act the โnew drugsโ require approval by the drug regulatory agency and introduction of the products into interstate commerce before granted approval is illegal.The FDA warns that on L’Orealโs website, Rosaliac AR Intense products imply drug altering medical benefits by providing localized redness intensive serum, reducing visible redness and sensations of discomfort, reducing redness with a long lasting efficacy, and that usage of the product as an alternative to laser treatment.The Mela-D pigment Control products were cited in the warning letter for claiming to provide concentrated dark spot correcting serum, treatment of dark spots and discoloration, and specifically recommended for hyperpigmentation and dark spots.The FDA further claimed that the Rosaliac AR Intense products are offered for treatment of conditions that are not amenable to self-diagnosis and treatment by individuals who are not medical practitioners, creating a danger to consumers who may not know how to properly use the drug safely for its intended purposes.Unlike drugs, which are required to be shown to be safe and effective prior to entering the market, cosmetic products are not required to undergo review before being marketed to consumers. However, the FDA sets strict guidelines on how cosmetic products can be marketed to consumers.Under federal law, cosmetic products are any product that is intended to be rubbed, poured, sprinkled, or sprayed on, introduced into or applied to the human body for cleansing or beautifying purposes. Cosmetic products are prohibited from using language that implies the products could heal, cure, or otherwise affect the structure or function of the body.The warning notice gives L’Oreal USA 15 working days to respond to the letter with the specific steps the company has taken to correct the violations. L’Oreal is also mandated to provide an explanation of each step being taken to identify violations and make corrections to ensure that similar violation will not occur again.L’Oreal can challenge the FDAโs opinion by submitting the reasoning and any supporting information for the agency to consider. However, failure to comply with either an official challenge of opinion or by taking the corrective action could result in legal action including unlimited seizures, or injunctions. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Cosmetics, L'OrealMore Lawsuit Stories Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect June 12, 2026 Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis June 12, 2026 Rezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis June 12, 2026 0 Comments FacebookThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (Posted: yesterday)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a manโs chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Malpractice Lawsuit Claims Device Left Veteran Partially Paralyzed (05/29/2026) Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (Posted: 2 days ago)A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026) Covidien Mesh Lawsuit Cleared for Trial Over Hernia Repair Complications (Posted: 3 days ago)A Covidien hernia mesh lawsuit will go before a jury next month after a federal judge rejected the manufacturer’s motion to have the case dismissed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITBard Ventralight Lawsuit Claims Hernia Mesh Failure Resulted in Ongoing Physical Disabilities (06/03/2026)Bard Ventralex Patch Lawsuit Claims Umbilical Hernia Mesh Failed, Requiring Removal Surgery (05/21/2026)Covidien ProGrip Mesh Complications Lawsuit Filed Over Alleged Defects and Failure To Warn Patients (04/21/2026)
Rezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis June 12, 2026
Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (Posted: yesterday)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a manโs chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Malpractice Lawsuit Claims Device Left Veteran Partially Paralyzed (05/29/2026)
Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (Posted: 2 days ago)A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)
Covidien Mesh Lawsuit Cleared for Trial Over Hernia Repair Complications (Posted: 3 days ago)A Covidien hernia mesh lawsuit will go before a jury next month after a federal judge rejected the manufacturer’s motion to have the case dismissed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITBard Ventralight Lawsuit Claims Hernia Mesh Failure Resulted in Ongoing Physical Disabilities (06/03/2026)Bard Ventralex Patch Lawsuit Claims Umbilical Hernia Mesh Failed, Requiring Removal Surgery (05/21/2026)Covidien ProGrip Mesh Complications Lawsuit Filed Over Alleged Defects and Failure To Warn Patients (04/21/2026)