Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Medical Malpractice Payments Are Not Driving up Healthcare Costs: Study May 15, 2013 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsA new study by Johns Hopkins suggests that the effects of payments made in medical malpractice lawsuits on the cost of healthcare are hugely overblown, highlighting the misguided push to limit awards as part of tort reform efforts in recent years. ย According to a press release issued earlier this month by Johns Hopkins, researchers found that payouts in substantial medical malpractice claims add less than 1% to the cost of health care in the United States.The study was published in the Journal for Healthcare Quality, examining payments in “catastrophic” medical malpractice claims, involving payments of more than $1 million, which are likely to involve patient deaths, birth injuries, or other claims for problems that result in the need for lifelong medical care as a result of a medical mistake.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONResearchers examined data from 2004 to 2010, finding that such substantial malpractice payments totalled only $1.4 billion. Most estimates place the cost of U.S. healthcare at around $2.8 trillion annually.In recent years, much of the political debate over the high cost of healthcare in the country has tried to lay some of the blame on medical malpractice lawsuit payouts, with politicians claiming that giving state legislatures the power to arbitrarily override jury decisions and cap awards at amounts unrelated to the details of the case would help control costs. However, this study adds to mounting research that has shown payouts for medical malpractice are much lower than is portrayed by tort reform advocates, and that it barely registers as a blip on the radar of healthcare costs.Defensive Medicine Costs Outstrip Malpractice PayoutsAccording to the Johns Hopkins researchers, the cost of actual claims pales in comparison to the cost of defensive medicine; unnecessary medical procedures and tests doctors conduct on patients in order to avoid lawsuits. That cost totaled about $60 billion annually, or more than 40 times the cost of actual medical malpractice payouts.Between 2004 and 2010 there were 77,621 medical malpractice claims paid. Of that, 7.9%, or 6,130, were considered “catastrophic” payouts, meaning they were over $1 million.“The notion that frivolous claims are routinely resulting in $100 million payouts is not true,” said Dr. Marty Makary, an associate professor of surgery and health policy at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and the lead researcher. “The real problem is that far too many tests and procedures are being performed in the name of defensive medicine, as physicians fear they could be sued if they don’t order them. It is not the payouts that are bankrupting the system — it’s the fear of them.”Other Studies Find Little ImpactThe study’s findings are similar to other recent studies that suggest the fear of medical malpractice far outweighs the actual threat to the health care system.A 2011 study published in the New England Medical Journal found that only 7.4% of physicians face the risk of medical malpractice claims each year. Only one out of every five claims result in a settlement or monetary award.Another study that year by Public Citizen, a consumer watchdog group, found that even defensive medicine’s costs do little to increase the cost of health care. The researchers found that the impact of defensive medicine is minimal and only accounts for 0.13% of overall healthcare costs.In many cases, doctors who claimed to be conducting defensive medicine are actually receiving financial incentives to order more tests. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Anesthesia, Johns Hopkins, Medical Malpractice, Medical Mistakes Image Credit: |||More Lawsuit Stories Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting July 30, 2026 Court Rejects Appeal in Similac Special Care Lawsuit Over NEC Warnings July 30, 2026 iPhone Fire Lawsuit Alleges Apple Smartphone Exploded, Causing Severe Burn Injuries July 30, 2026 1 Comments Joseph May 17, 2013 I doubt this study will help rescind damage caps and the hurdles medical negligence victims must jump through to pursue justice. Tort reformists are likely to ignore the Public Citizen study and argue doctors order too many tests and procedures in the name of defensive medicine to avoid lawsuits. However, does that make any sense? Doctors unethically ordering tests or performing procedures that are unnecessary, and penny-pinching insurance companies who only care about profits paying out large sums of money to support this conduct? If doctors truly are acting unethically by ordering unnecessary tests and performing unnecessary procedures, shouldn’t those doctors be held accountable? Isn’t it more realistic, and reasonable, to believe that as technology improves and patient expectations increase, doctors are using as many tools as are available? Granted, some insurance companies require doctors to order certain tests before other, more definitive tests, but the reality is patients want answers. Patients demand to know what is wrong with them and, if there is something to treat, patients want it treated. Long gone are the days of “wait and see”, or “it is probably benign”, or “I believe it is nothing to worry about”. As long as technology improves, patient education increases, and public dissemination of information continues, patients want definitive answers and curative treatment. CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026) J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: 2 days ago)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026) Chlorpyrifos Exposure Lawsuit Claims Pesticide Caused Farmer’s Parkinson’s Disease Diagnosis (Posted: 3 days ago)A chlorpyrifos lawsuit claims years of exposure through residence and work left a California man with a Parkinson’s disease diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: CHLORPYRIFOS PARKINSONโS DISEASE LAWSUITChlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Claims Years of Insecticide Exposure Caused Neurological Side Effects (07/22/2026)Chlorpyrifos (CPF) Exposure Linked to Abnormal Brain Development in Children: Study (08/27/2025)Court Ruling Allows EPA to Proceed with Chlorpyrifos Ban (10/23/2023)
Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)
J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: 2 days ago)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)
Chlorpyrifos Exposure Lawsuit Claims Pesticide Caused Farmer’s Parkinson’s Disease Diagnosis (Posted: 3 days ago)A chlorpyrifos lawsuit claims years of exposure through residence and work left a California man with a Parkinson’s disease diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: CHLORPYRIFOS PARKINSONโS DISEASE LAWSUITChlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Claims Years of Insecticide Exposure Caused Neurological Side Effects (07/22/2026)Chlorpyrifos (CPF) Exposure Linked to Abnormal Brain Development in Children: Study (08/27/2025)Court Ruling Allows EPA to Proceed with Chlorpyrifos Ban (10/23/2023)