Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit Claims Off-Label Use Led to Permanent Injuries May 28, 2013 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Medtronic continues to face new product liability lawsuits over its Infuse bone graft product, which has been linked to reprots of nerve damage and other injuries caused by the excessive growth of bone around the spinal cord following off-label use of the device for purposes that the FDA never approved. ย ย ย In one of the latest complaints (PDF) filed on April 24, Gerard and Sharonda Ledet claim that Medtronic aggressively marketed off-label of use of the Infuse without the LT-Cage, which is a device meant to control the bone growth protein. According to the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Gerard Ledet had Infuse implanted in April 2007, and has suffered back pain and other complications caused by bone overgrowth. Medtronic Infuse is a bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) that is designed to be applied to an absorbable collagen sponge placed within a device known as an LT-Cage, which is then implanted to encourage bone growth and fuse the gaps between vertebrae. Stay Up-to-Date About Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Medtronic Infuse Bone Graft Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Although the FDA only approved the Medtronic Infuse and LT-Cage for the limited spinal procedures involving a single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), where the spine is approached from the front, theย Medtronic Infuse has been widely used โoff-labelโ for other types of spine fusion surgery, which have been linked to an increased risk of severe and painful complications caused by excessive or ectopic bone growth. Ledet’s procedure involved the use of Infuse on multiple levels and did not include the cage. The lawsuit claims Ledet and his doctor were mislead by Medtronic about the safety of Infuse and about the need for the LT-Cage. As a result of complications following Medtronic Infuse surgery, Ledet indicates that he suffered uncontrolled bone growth, resulting in back pain, leg pain and foot numbness. He underwent revision surgery in 2009 to remove the overgrown bone, but the bone grew back and he continues to suffer chronic pain and disability. Allegations of Off-Label Promotion of Medtronic Infuse Medtronic has faces a number of similar injury lawsuits that allege the company illegally promoted Infuse off-label, and the company has also faced government investigations that suggested Medtronic intentionally mislead the medical community about the safety of Infuse. Last year, aย congressional investigationย determined that Medtronic paid $210 million to study authors that failed to include data on Infuse complications in their reports. Those authors not only failed to disclose links to Medtronic, but the investigation also determined that Medtronic employees secretly edited and sometimes wrote parts of the studies before they were published. Although the FDA only approved Infuse for use with the LT-cage, Medtronic has sold the products separately. The FDA specifically warned Medtronic not to promote the use of the Infuse off-label due to the risk of harm to patients, however, Medtronic allegedly paid spine surgery โopinion leadersโ in the medical community to do just that. After receiving numerous reports of adverse events and deaths, in 2008 the FDA issued a warning against the off-label use of Infuse and the LT-Cage. Ledet’s lawsuit charges Medtronic with fraud, failure to warn, designing a defective product, negligence, negligent misrepresentation, and breach of warranty. His wife is suing for loss of consortium. The couple seeks compensatory and punitive damages. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Bone Graft, Infuse, Medtronic, Medtronic Infuse Image Credit: | More Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit Stories Medtronic Infuse Problems Hidden From Regulators, Report Claims April 12, 2016 Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit Appealed to U.S. Supreme Court Over Off-Label Marketing September 21, 2015 Side Effects of Bone Graft Substitutes Linked to Child Health Risks, FDA Warns January 22, 2015 0 Comments X/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES 10 Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Selected by Court for Early Trial Dates (Posted: today) A federal judge has selected 10 hair relaxer lawsuits to serve as potential bellwether trials after altering the selection process to eliminate non-representative cases. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Seeks Certification for Medical Monitoring Claims (04/01/2026)Hair Relaxer Endometrial Cancer Lawsuits and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Proposed for Early Trials (03/23/2026)Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (03/12/2026) High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday) A Depo-Provera lawsuit indicates that a Washington state woman must receive ongoing medical monitoring and brain scans due to a high-risk brain tumor allegedly caused by the birth control shot. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (03/19/2026)Depo Injection Lawsuit Claims Birth Control Shot Caused Meningioma Brain Tumor (03/17/2026) Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (Posted: 4 days ago) An Illinois woman has joined a growing number of plaintiffs alleging that the Medtronic Intellis neurostimulator, and similar devices, may fail to relieve chronic pain and instead lead to worsening complications. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)Abbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (03/20/2026)
10 Hair Relaxer Lawsuits Selected by Court for Early Trial Dates (Posted: today) A federal judge has selected 10 hair relaxer lawsuits to serve as potential bellwether trials after altering the selection process to eliminate non-representative cases. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITHair Relaxer Class Action Lawsuit Seeks Certification for Medical Monitoring Claims (04/01/2026)Hair Relaxer Endometrial Cancer Lawsuits and Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits Proposed for Early Trials (03/23/2026)Lawyers To Nominate Hair Relaxer Cancer Cases for Early Bellwether Trials Next Week (03/12/2026)
High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: yesterday) A Depo-Provera lawsuit indicates that a Washington state woman must receive ongoing medical monitoring and brain scans due to a high-risk brain tumor allegedly caused by the birth control shot. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (03/19/2026)Depo Injection Lawsuit Claims Birth Control Shot Caused Meningioma Brain Tumor (03/17/2026)
Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (Posted: 4 days ago) An Illinois woman has joined a growing number of plaintiffs alleging that the Medtronic Intellis neurostimulator, and similar devices, may fail to relieve chronic pain and instead lead to worsening complications. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)Abbott Proclaim SCS Lawsuit Alleges Stimulator Lead Migration Resulted in Multiple Surgeries (03/24/2026)Abbott, Boston Scientific Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL (03/20/2026)