Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Medtronic Infuse Problems Hidden From Regulators, Report Claims April 12, 2016 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsA new report suggests that Medtronic failed to adequately inform federal regulators about more than 1,000 adverse event reports linked to its Infuse bone growth product for years, including at least four patient deaths.ย Medtronic Infuse is a bio-engineered bone graft product, which has been promoted as an alternative spinal fusion procedure. The recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) is implanted to encourage bone growth and fuse gaps between the vertebrea, providing an alternative to traditional spinal fusions, where bone is harvested from another area of the body or used from a cadaver.In recent years, a number of serious concerns about problems with Medtronic Infuse have been linked to the product, including instances of bone overgrowth, inflammatory reactions, nerve damage, respiratory compression and other complications, including death.Stay Up-to-Date AboutMedtronic Infuse Bone Graft LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreStay Up-to-Date AboutMedtronic Infuse Bone Graft LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic lawsuit updates or developments."*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreAccording to a special report published this week by the Minnesota Star Tribune, Medtronic may have known about the risk of Infuse complications for years, and failed to properly report the issues to the FDA.The Star Tribune indicates that the medical device manufacturer shut down a study involving 3,600 individuals in the spring of 2008, but failed to inform the FDA about complications experienced within the 30-day time period required by law.Since the publication of this report, Medtronic has challenged many of the findings in a press release issued the same day, indicating that the information had been unfairly presented.The manufacturer has faced hundreds of Medtronic Infuse lawsuits in recent years, which alleged that the manufacturer sold an unreasonably dangerous and defective product, failing to adequately warn consumers and the medical community about the risks associated with receiving the bone growth product.The FDA only approved Infuse rhBMP-2 for limited use during spinal fusion procedures where the lumbar spine is approached through the front and the product is applied to an absorbable collagen sponge that is placed within an โLT-Cageโ that is implanted to encourage bone growth and fuse the gaps between the vertebrae. However, the product has been widely used off-label during other types of spinal surgery, and many users have reported suffering catastrophic complications due to excessive bone growth around the spine.Medtronic Infuse has been used on more than 1 million patients, according to the manufacturer. The study that is the focus of the Star Tribune article occurred between 2002 and 2006. However, it took the company five years to inform the FDA about the earlier complications reported by doctors during the retrospective chart review (RCR).“Medtronic has acknowledged that at the time the RCR was discontinued back in 2008, it was not properly archived and the information collected was not fully assessed for reportability to the FDA,” the company admitted in its press release. “We have taken a number of steps to update our clinical policies and our training to enhance our reporting practices.”The company claims the article falsely suggests the company was trying to conceal the information. However, the company has a history as a “bad actor” in how it conducts clinical trials and influences medical studies.In 2012, aย congressional investigationย determined that Medtronic paid $210 million to study authors that failed to include data on complications linked to its Infuse bone growth product in their reports. Those authors not only failed to disclose links to Medtronic, but the investigation also determined that Medtronic employees secretly edited and sometimes wrote parts of the studies before they were published, which encouraged the off-label use of Infuse. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Bone Graft, Clinical Trials, Medtronic, Medtronic InfuseMore Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit Stories Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit Appealed to U.S. Supreme Court Over Off-Label Marketing September 21, 2015 Side Effects of Bone Graft Substitutes Linked to Child Health Risks, FDA Warns January 22, 2015 Whistleblower Lawsuit Results in $10M Settlement by Medtronic May 30, 2014 0 CommentsX/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (Posted: today)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a manโs chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Malpractice Lawsuit Claims Device Left Veteran Partially Paralyzed (05/29/2026) Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (Posted: yesterday)A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026) Covidien Mesh Lawsuit Cleared for Trial Over Hernia Repair Complications (Posted: 2 days ago)A Covidien hernia mesh lawsuit will go before a jury next month after a federal judge rejected the manufacturer’s motion to have the case dismissed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITBard Ventralight Lawsuit Claims Hernia Mesh Failure Resulted in Ongoing Physical Disabilities (06/03/2026)Bard Ventralex Patch Lawsuit Claims Umbilical Hernia Mesh Failed, Requiring Removal Surgery (05/21/2026)Covidien ProGrip Mesh Complications Lawsuit Filed Over Alleged Defects and Failure To Warn Patients (04/21/2026)
Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (Posted: today)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims that the Abbott Proclaim XR 5 system failed to treat a manโs chronic pain, instead leaving him with shocks and burning sensations.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Malpractice Lawsuit Claims Device Left Veteran Partially Paralyzed (05/29/2026)
Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (Posted: yesterday)A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)
Covidien Mesh Lawsuit Cleared for Trial Over Hernia Repair Complications (Posted: 2 days ago)A Covidien hernia mesh lawsuit will go before a jury next month after a federal judge rejected the manufacturer’s motion to have the case dismissed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITBard Ventralight Lawsuit Claims Hernia Mesh Failure Resulted in Ongoing Physical Disabilities (06/03/2026)Bard Ventralex Patch Lawsuit Claims Umbilical Hernia Mesh Failed, Requiring Removal Surgery (05/21/2026)Covidien ProGrip Mesh Complications Lawsuit Filed Over Alleged Defects and Failure To Warn Patients (04/21/2026)