Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Medtronic Infuse Settlement Agreement Reached For $22M May 7, 2014 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsMedtronic has agreed to pay about $22 million to settle about 950 Infuse BMP lawsuits filed on behalf of individuals nationwide who have experienced problems after receiving the bone graft product. ย The settlement was announced in a press release issued on May 6, but does not include an admission of guilt and still leaves an estimated 750 cases unresolved.Estimates suggest that litigation costs, including all Medtronic Infuse settlements, will ultimately cost the company between $120 and $140 million. Whether those remaining cases will proceed to trial or be settled later is unknown.Stay Up-to-Date AboutMedtronic Infuse Bone Graft LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreStay Up-to-Date AboutMedtronic Infuse Bone Graft LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Medtronic lawsuit updates or developments."*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreMedtronic Infuseย is a newer type of bio-engineered bone graft product that has been promoted as an alternative to traditional spinal fusions, where bone is harvested from another area of the body or used from a cadaver.The FDA approved Infuse recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein (rhBMP-2) for limited use during spinal fusion procedures where the lumbar spine is approached through the front and the product is applied to an absorbable collagen sponge that is placed within an โLT-Cageโ that is implanted to encourage bone growth and fuse the gaps between the vertebrae. However, Medtronic has been accused of illegally promoting the device for non-approved uses, with a vast majority of sales for Infuse involving applications that were never approved by the FDA.In March 2014, Medtronic indicated that the number of lawsuits over Infuse are likely to continue to grow significantly, and the manufacturer has indicated that it intends to defend its product in court.The settlement announcement came just days after the California Supreme Court granted the company’s petition to review a decision by a lower court that determined that Medtronic Infuse lawsuits were not preempted by federal law.“This agreement is a compromise of disputed claims and is not in any way an admission of liability or validity of any defense in the litigation by Medtronic,” the company stated. “The company continues to stand behind INFUSE Bone Graft, which has been utilized in more than one million patients since it was approved more than ten years ago, and will vigorously defend the product and company actions in the remaining cases.”Medtronic has tried repeatedly to have the cases dismissed, arguing that the product liability lawsuits should be pre-empted by federal law because the Infuse device was approved by the FDA. The manufacturer has argued that the controversial Supreme Court decision inย Riegel v. Medtronicย should be applied to protect them from design defect claims, but plaintiffs claim that the company loses that protection because it illegally marketed Infuse for uses not approved by the FDA.According to allegations raised by plaintiffs in the Medtronic Infuse lawsuits, since the manufacturer has withheld important safety information about the risks associated with off-label uses, the claims should therefore not be subject to the Supreme Court decision that state-law product liability claims involving approved medical devices are preempted by federal law.Aย federal judge rejected the companyโs pre-emption argumentย in August, allowing some cases to proceed. However, unlike many similar litigation, the Medtronic Infuse lawsuits have not been centralized in federal court, which means each case is going through pretrial proceedings individually, increasing the chances of contradictory rulings by different judges.The company has appealed that decision to the U.S. Supreme Court. The California Supreme Court says it will not make a decision on Medtronic Infuse cases until the federal high court does. However, it is unclear at this time whether those appeals will continue if settlements are reached to resolve the cases. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Bone Graft, California, Infuse, Medtronic, Medtronic InfuseMore Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit Stories Medtronic Infuse Problems Hidden From Regulators, Report Claims April 12, 2016 Medtronic Infuse Lawsuit Appealed to U.S. Supreme Court Over Off-Label Marketing September 21, 2015 Side Effects of Bone Graft Substitutes Linked to Child Health Risks, FDA Warns January 22, 2015 5 Comments Martha September 21, 2017 Status of suits for adhesive arachnoiditis caused by surgeons error and or epidural steroid injections . If have infuse ( remember actifuse in one record but given had three revisions can’t imagine didn’t have infuse in one of them. How to proceed 7202443558 . Also second surgeon destroyed my trapezius muscles doing unnecessary posterior fusion (12+ screws that were not needed) . He later removed hardware where my arachnoiditis was diagnosed which exacerbated condition. Kelly August 5, 2017 I had a 3 level cervical fusion in July 2007 by neurosurgeon who used BMP. Immediately after the surgery while still in hospital my pain worsened each day instead of getting better. My throat was swollen, and I was released from the hospital after 5 days with no explanation of why my pain was increasing. I developed nerve damage which I didn’t have before the surgery. The surgeon kept asking if I smoke. I had quit smoking before the surgery and never resumed it. He said the fusion was incomplete. He had put 3 spacers in and used the BMP and no metal. Then he retired and I had a 2nd surgery in March 2008by his assistant surgeon. Just before I was to be released from the hospital, this surgeon came and told me I was going to need another surgery where he would go in thru the back of my neck. The metal failed immediately and it destroyed a good disc. I could feel my neck wasn’t stable and could feel the metal moving around. I went to a 2nd opinion at a 3rd Neurosurgeon who practiced at the same hospital and he showed me an x-ray of someones neck and said that is hormone should look. Mine looked nothing like that. The small piece of metal in the front of my neck and punctured a good disc. In January of 2010 I had a 3rd surgery by an orthopedic surgeon at a different hospital and he had to reconstruct my neck doing surgery on the front and back at the same time. I have approximately 18 pieces of metal in my neck now and have bad shoulder cramps and nerve pain on both sides. This 3rd surgeon did a good job repairing the damage the first two neurosurgeons caused but I now have a 4level fusion and have to be very careful to adjust my neck when I sleep using a cervical pillow. I felt like I was going to die after the first surgery because of the swelling and daily increasing pain that kept increasing for about a month. I have to be careful now while eating certinan things so that I don’t choke. I didn’t find out that I was “having a bad reaction to the BMP” until the 2nd surgeon told me. Martha October 29, 2015 I had to have all the hardware removed tin lumbar region anterior and posterior revised with l4–s1 added . My second neurosurgeon looked at ct (finally I guess cuz it was in last years report too-) that “someone must have been asleep at the wheel during cervical surgery as the rod is not cut off and is I bedding itself in c2 vertebrae. I gave told him of excruciating pain up there since right after surgery and it is mentioned that rod is making contact with c2 vertebrae in radiology report last year. He is revising meaning cutting rod off November 25 and fixing facial dehescince that he did acknowledge last year was there. My podiatrist says this is malpractice and is ready to give me his attorneys number. Ps still not sure if second lumbar fusion failed cuz can’t seem to get Cigna to cover mri at this point. I think actifuse or infuse may have factored into arachnoiditis as well. Thanks Martha 7202443556 Martha March 11, 2015 I had first cervical fusion in 1994. In 2010 had cervical fusion done (using I believe either actifuse or infuse). Had lumbar fusion March 2010 and was unable to walk for 2 weeks post surgically (put in rehab 11 days). Also actiifuse or infuse. Found out April that cervical fusion fails (pseudoarthroses-I am non smoker), and again fails in June 2010 needing yet another revision. During and after this time my left leg and low back pain comes back with vengeance and new symptoms on opposite side. Multiple injections, nerves finally burnt and finally go to new neurosurgeons in 2013 both who agree have failed back syndrome and adhesive arachnoiditis from lumbar fusion in 2010. Since then new neurosurgeon has had to go in anteriorly and posteriorly to fuse c3-t3 posteriorly. 4 weeks ago I had my neurosurgeon remove all hardware from 2010 surgery, and replace it both anteriorly and posteriorly from l2-s1. My life has been completely turned upside down because of the errors made and or products utilized in 2010 Kathleen February 3, 2015 I have had 3 neck surgeries, first one was to get bone spurs off C-6 and got better for a short time, then about a year later had 2 discs replaced on C-5 and C-6, saying they used my own bone and put in a titanium brace from the front of my neck, wearing a hard brace for 2 months and never got better, then the surgeon said she had to go back in and remove bone spurs on C-7 and T-1 and didn’t have any brace. But now it has been almost 2 years and I still live in chronic pain. I have not worked for over 4 years. Bee going from one doctor to the next and no help. Only thing they do is give me pain meds, but I can not live without them as they help me function.InstagramThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (Posted: today)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026) Judges Will Consider MDL for Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Late Next Month (Posted: yesterday)A group of federal judges will determine whether all Dupixent cancer lawsuits should be formed into a multidistrict litigation, following oral arguments set for May 28.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Injections Caused Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Diagnosis: Lawsuit (04/06/2026)Link Between Dupixent and CTCL Withheld From Users, Medical Community: Lawsuit (03/31/2026)Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (03/26/2026) SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (Posted: 2 days ago)A product liability lawsuit alleges unlicensed Abbott representatives made real-time spinal cord stimulator programming decisions based on a Texas womanโs responses, improperly modifying the device and contributing to her injuries.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITWaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026)Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026)Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)
Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot: Lawsuit (Posted: today)A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (04/15/2026)High-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)
Judges Will Consider MDL for Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Late Next Month (Posted: yesterday)A group of federal judges will determine whether all Dupixent cancer lawsuits should be formed into a multidistrict litigation, following oral arguments set for May 28.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Injections Caused Peripheral T-Cell Lymphoma (PTCL) Diagnosis: Lawsuit (04/06/2026)Link Between Dupixent and CTCL Withheld From Users, Medical Community: Lawsuit (03/31/2026)Drug Makers Agree Dupixent Cancer Lawsuits Should Be Centralized in MDL (03/26/2026)
SCS Injury Lawsuit Alleges Unlicensed Abbott Representatives Modified Device After Implantation (Posted: 2 days ago)A product liability lawsuit alleges unlicensed Abbott representatives made real-time spinal cord stimulator programming decisions based on a Texas womanโs responses, improperly modifying the device and contributing to her injuries.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITWaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (04/14/2026)Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026)Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)