Merrill Lynch Trading Overcharges Results in $1.3M in Fines, Restitution

|

Merrill Lynch has been fined $1.05 million by a regulatory agency for overcharging customers on nonconvertible preferred securities, and the brokerage firm has been ordered to pay more than $323,000 in restitution to cusomers. ย 

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced on April 16 that a programming error caused Merrill Lynch to overcharge for trading in 12,259 transactions involving its ML BondMarket.

In addition to the fine and restitution, the company will also revise its written supervisory procedures for non-convertible preferred securities.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

“FINRA found that Merrill Lynch had programmed a faulty pricing logic into ML BondMarket that only incorporated quotations published on the primary listing exchange for that non-convertible preferred security,” the authority said in a press release issued last week. “As a result, in instances when there was a better quote on a market other than the primary listing exchange, that quote was not reflected on ML BondMarket.”

The authority ruled that Merrill Lynch failed to properly review its transactions even after several thousand transactions were flagged by FINRA and several warning letters were issued.

Merrill Lynch officials say the company has corrected the programming error.

FINRA oversees all securities firms doing business in the United States, providing arbitration services for claims against stock brokers and serving to protect investors by making sure the securities industry operates fairly and honestly.

FINRA was created in July 2007 as a successor to the National Association of Securities Dealers, to arbitrateย stock broker fraud claimsย that can include charges of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, misrepresentation, unauthorized trading and other claims that investments were improperly handled.

The ruling comes a year after FINRA awarded $10.2 million to two former brokers who said the company denied them deferred compensation benefits promised by the company. FINRA fined Merrill Lynch in that case for abusive and fraudulent conduct.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Lawsuit alleges Olympus failed to address known problems with sterilizing duodenoscopes, leading to a fatal ERCP infection years after federal regulators first raised concerns about the devices.
Federal regulators have centralized at least 23 Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in a multidistrict litigation that excludes multiple similar claims involving Abbott and Nevro implants.