Merrill Lynch Trading Overcharges Results in $1.3M in Fines, Restitution

Merrill Lynch has been fined $1.05 million by a regulatory agency for overcharging customers on nonconvertible preferred securities, and the brokerage firm has been ordered to pay more than $323,000 in restitution to cusomers.  

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) announced on April 16 that a programming error caused Merrill Lynch to overcharge for trading in 12,259 transactions involving its ML BondMarket.

In addition to the fine and restitution, the company will also revise its written supervisory procedures for non-convertible preferred securities.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

“FINRA found that Merrill Lynch had programmed a faulty pricing logic into ML BondMarket that only incorporated quotations published on the primary listing exchange for that non-convertible preferred security,” the authority said in a press release issued last week. “As a result, in instances when there was a better quote on a market other than the primary listing exchange, that quote was not reflected on ML BondMarket.”

The authority ruled that Merrill Lynch failed to properly review its transactions even after several thousand transactions were flagged by FINRA and several warning letters were issued.

Merrill Lynch officials say the company has corrected the programming error.

FINRA oversees all securities firms doing business in the United States, providing arbitration services for claims against stock brokers and serving to protect investors by making sure the securities industry operates fairly and honestly.

FINRA was created in July 2007 as a successor to the National Association of Securities Dealers, to arbitrate stock broker fraud claims that can include charges of breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, negligence, misrepresentation, unauthorized trading and other claims that investments were improperly handled.

The ruling comes a year after FINRA awarded $10.2 million to two former brokers who said the company denied them deferred compensation benefits promised by the company. FINRA fined Merrill Lynch in that case for abusive and fraudulent conduct.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025
Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025 (Posted yesterday)

A series of four bellwether claims in the baby formula NEC lawsuit MDL will be ready to go before a federal juries in May 2025, August 2025, November 2025 and February 2026 according to a proposed trial schedule agreed upon by both plaintiffs and defendants.

AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit MDL Established in Southern District of California
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit MDL Established in Southern District of California (Posted 2 days ago)

U.S. JPML has transferred all AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings as part of a federal MDL (multidistrict litigation).