Class Action Lawsuit Over Medtronic MiniMed Insulin Pumps Filed in Canada

Amid a growing number of Medtronic MiniMed insulin pump lawsuits being filed in the United States, the manufacturer now faces a national class action lawsuit filed in Canada over the same problems.

Medtronic MiniMed insulin pumps are small, computerized devices intended to deliver specific amounts of insulin to diabetic patients throughout the day via a catheter implanted under the skin. They are wirelessly connected to both the patientโ€™s blood glucose meter and a monitoring system to track glucose levels, as well as a remote controller designed to communicate with the pump and deliver a specific amount of insulin.

When functioning properly, these devices and their components mimic the ways a healthy pancreas works by delivering continuous and controlled doses of rapid-acting insulin, 24 hours a day, to match the userโ€™s body needs. However, following more than 26,000 reports involving Medtronic Minimed pump problems, the manufacturer acknowledged that certain products may be prone to over or under deliver the programmed amount of insulin.

When the MinimMd infusion pumps were recalled, Medtronic indicated there was a defect in the locking retainer rings which prevent the insulin reservoir from being properly set inside the pump when it is loaded, potentially preventing the delivery of life-saving insulin.

"*" indicates required fields

"*" indicates required fields

The lawsuit filed in Canada involves the MiniMed 630G and 670G insulin pump models, which have been the subject of a number of recalls, including more than half a million recalled last month.

Theย original Medtronic MiniMed 600 series recallย was announced in February, impacting certain 630G and 670G insulin pump models, after the manufacturer acknowledged it was aware of 26,421 complaints in which the pump over or under delivered the programmed amount of insulin, resulting in 2,175 injuries and one death.

The lawsuit alleges that Medtronic knew or should have known the devices contained a defective retainer ring which could result in prevention of the delivery of life-saving insulin, or an insulin overdose. It indicates one of the lead plaintiffs was hospitalized due to severe hyperglycemia.

The case raises allegations similar to those presented in the ongoing litigation pending in the United States, each claiming the manufacturer knew, or should have known, defects with the 600 series insulin pumps posed a serious risk for consumers.

Over the coming months and years, as product liability lawyers continue to investigate claims for individuals who experienced problems after a Medtronic Minimed pump failure, the size and scope of the U.S. litigation is expected to continue to increase, likely involving hundreds of lawsuits that may be filed in courts nationwide.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: Image via <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-931246p1.html?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Ken Wolter</a> / <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/editorial?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Shutterstock.com</a>



2 Comments


darren
this affected me.

Donna
My retainer ring broke while I was on the phone with Medtronicโ€™s tech support. They werenโ€™t too concerned about it.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.