Mirena IUD Lawsuit Filed Over Permanent Papilledema, Vision Problems

|

After receiving a Mirena intrauterine device (IUD) for long-term birth control, a Texas woman indicates that she developed severe headaches, vision problems and permanent papilledema due pseudotumor cerebri, which involves a build up of fluid pressure around the brain.

In a complaint (PDF) filed against Bayer Healthcare in the U.S. District Court in the Southern District of New York on July 7, Alyssa Johnson indicates that the manufacturer failed to warn consumers and the medical community about the risks associated with the Mirena IUD.

Johnson, 34, says that the birth control was implanted in May 2014 without complication. However, she was diagnosed in July 2015 with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH), which is also known as pseudotumor cerebri (PTC). The fluid pressure around the brain caused swelling of the optic nerves, known as papilledema from Mirena, which has left Johnson with severe headaches and vision problems, which are expected to be permanent.

IIH/PTC is a serious medical condition, which has been linked to other birth control products. However, Mirena warnings failed to provide any indication that users may experience problems, or that they should seek immediate medication attention if vision issues or headaches develop.

While the fluid pressure around the brain can often be treated, if permanent optic nerve damage is suffered due to PTC/IIH, women may be left with blindness or other long-term complications.

The lawsuit indicates that Bayer knew or should have known that the Mirena could cause PTC/IIH.

“Despite the rarity of PTC/IIH, women who use levonorgestrel-containing products, like the Mirenaยฎ IUS, more commonly develop the disorder,” the lawsuit states. “The synthetic hormone released by Mirena, levonorgestrel, causes or contributes to the development of PTC/IIH, increases the risk of developing PTC/IIH, and/or worsens or exacerbates PTC/IIH.”

Johnson’sย claim joins a growing number ofย Mirena IUD lawsuitsย filed in federal courts nationwide, each raising similar allegations that women may have avoided serious injuries if adequate information had been disclosed to consumers and the medical community.

In late April 2017, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) established coordinated pretrial proceedings for all cases brought by women diagnosed with PTC/IIH from the Mirena birth control implant, centralizing the claims before U.S. District Judge Paul A. Englemayer in the Southern District of New York.

Asย Mirena lawyers continue to review and file claimsย for women nationwide, it is expected that the size and scope of the litigation will continue to grow over the coming weeks and months.

As part of the coordinated pretrial proceedings, it is expected that Judge Englemayer will establish a bellwether program, where a small group of cases will be prepared for early trial dates to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that is likely to be repeated throughout the litigation.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



2 Comments


Kimberly
I began Yaz in 2002 and was diagnosed with papellidema in 2004. I am currently using Mirena, which was installed in 2011. I have maintained the condition for the past 16 years.

Neidia
I was diagnosed with papilledema on December of 2015. Was on medication for a year.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A federal judge is being asked to certify seven hair relaxer class action lawsuits seeking medical monitoring for users, following studies that link the products to an increased risk of cancer.
Three sports betting addiction lawsuits claim the plaintiffs were targeted by FanDuel and DraftKings apps once addictive gambling qualities were detected, leading the platforms to exploit them even more.
At least three Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits were filed this week, making it the latest manufacturer to face multiple claims alleging the implants are defectively designed.