Netflix Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Unfair Internet DVD Pricing

A class action lawsuit has been filed against Netflix and Wal-Mart, alleging that they colluded to limit competition for on-line DVD rentals and created an illegal monopoly.

The Wal-Mart and Netflix class action lawsuit seeks damages for Netflix subscribers who paid higher subscription rates than they otherwise would have paid.

The complaint stems from a 2005 agreement made between the companies, which plaintiffs allege created an unfair monopoly in the online DVD rental market.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

At a time when both Netflix and Walmart were competing for internet DVD rental business, the companies reached an agreement where Wal-Mart agreed to exit the on-line rental business in exchange for Netflix agreeing to stop DVD sales.

Prior to the agreement, Netflix was charging a monthly subscription fee of $14.99 and Wal-Mart’s competing service was priced at $12.97 per month. Following the allegedly illegal agreement which promoted unfair trade, Netflix raised their subscription fee $3.00, to $17.99 per month.

The internet DVD rental lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, seeking recovery of three times the financial damages suffered by Netflix subscribers, plus attorney fees.

Earlier last month, a similar lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs in that case also allege that the companies engaged in unfair trade practices that created a monopoly, but also claims that it caused Blockbuster, Inc., a third competitor in the on-line DVD rental business, to raise their subscription prices by $3.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Change Healthcare Data Breach Lawyers Meeting Today With MDL Judge For Initial Status Conference
Change Healthcare Data Breach Lawyers Meeting Today With MDL Judge For Initial Status Conference (Posted yesterday)

The judge presiding over all Change Healthcare lawsuits filed in federal court is holding the first status conference of the litigation, which is expected to grow significantly as Change Healthcare data breach letters continue to be sent to impacted customers.

Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury
Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury (Posted 2 days ago)

Complaint comes as a panel of federal judges are scheduled to hear oral arguments later this month, to determine whether all AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide should be centralized before one judge.