Netflix Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Unfair Internet DVD Pricing

|

A class action lawsuit has been filed against Netflix and Wal-Mart, alleging that they colluded to limit competition for on-line DVD rentals and created an illegal monopoly.

The Wal-Mart and Netflix class action lawsuit seeks damages for Netflix subscribers who paid higher subscription rates than they otherwise would have paid.

The complaint stems from a 2005 agreement made between the companies, which plaintiffs allege created an unfair monopoly in the online DVD rental market.

Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits
Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits

At a time when both Netflix and Walmart were competing for internet DVD rental business, the companies reached an agreement where Wal-Mart agreed to exit the on-line rental business in exchange for Netflix agreeing to stop DVD sales.

Prior to the agreement, Netflix was charging a monthly subscription fee of $14.99 and Wal-Mart’s competing service was priced at $12.97 per month. Following the allegedly illegal agreement which promoted unfair trade, Netflix raised their subscription fee $3.00, to $17.99 per month.

The internet DVD rental lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas, seeking recovery of three times the financial damages suffered by Netflix subscribers, plus attorney fees.

Earlier last month, a similar lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs in that case also allege that the companies engaged in unfair trade practices that created a monopoly, but also claims that it caused Blockbuster, Inc., a third competitor in the on-line DVD rental business, to raise their subscription prices by $3.


0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case.
An Indiana woman has filed a Cartiva SCI implant lawsuit, indicating that the toe implant failed due to a defective design, resulting in the need for revision surgery and recommendations to permanently fuse her big toe.
Two California hair stylists filed separate lawsuits, indicating that repeated occupational exposure to toxic chemicals in hair coloring dyes caused them to develop bladder cancer.