New Jersey Malpractice Lawsuit Remanded for New Trial and $70M Award Overturned

The New Jersey Supreme Court has overturned a record $70 million medical malpractice verdict, saying the trial was plagued with errors.

The overturned verdict, which was reportedly the largest ever for a New Jersey malpractice lawsuit, was awarded to the parents of Casey Pellicer, who suffered brain damage due to a lack of oxygen after spina bifida surgery at Saint Barnabas Hospital in 1998.

In a 6-0 ruling, the state’s highest appeals court remanded the case for a new trial, saying bias against medical professionals led to contamination of the juror pool and made it impossible for attorneys to determine which potential jurors may have been biased. The decision also cited questionable decisions regarding expert testimony and evidence that the jury was prevented from seeing as additional reasons that the verdict must be negated.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

According to the complaint, Pellicer was four months old when he underwent spina bifida surgery at the hospital to remove a cyst from near his spine. The family alleged that after the surgery a breathing tube became dislodged, depriving the infant of oxygen to the brain. As a result, he suffers from learning, speaking and motor function disabilities.

The original trial held nurse Delphine Anderson, physician Anne Olesnicky and two of Olesnicky’s trainers, Michael Vallee and Norman Zeig, responsible for the injuries caused by the lack of oxygen. The jury awarded $75 million, which was adjusted down to $70 million, including $50 million for pain and suffering.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury
Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury (Posted today)

Complaint comes as a panel of federal judges are scheduled to hear oral arguments later this month, to determine whether all AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide should be centralized before one judge.

Depo-Provera Meningioma Brain Tumors Risks May Have Been Ignored by Pfizer for Decades
Depo-Provera Meningioma Brain Tumors Risks May Have Been Ignored by Pfizer for Decades (Posted 4 days ago)

After decades of medical research and reported Depo-Provera side effects, Pfizer should have known that its birth control shot increases the risks of meningioma brain tumors, yet failed to warn women or the medical community.