Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
CPSC Approves New High Powered Toy Magnet Safety Rules October 7, 2014 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsIn response to mounting reports of magnetic toy injuries, federal safety regulators have approved new rules designed to reduce the risk of problems associated with accidental ingestion, which has typically occurred when teens or young children accidentally swallow more than one of the small, powerful magnets, allowing them to attract across intestinal walls.The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) announced on September 25 that it has put new national safety standards in place affecting high-powered magnet sets, which have been sold as desk toys in recent years, featuring a large number of small rare earth magnets that can be manipulated into various shapes.The new magnet rules come after several battles to require several manufacturers to recall their products, after finding that warnings provided are insufficient to avoid injuries.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONU.S. CPSC will require individual magnets from a set to be large enough that it does not fit into the CPSC’s small parts cylinder, which is a measuring tool for accidental swallowing risks. If the magnet is small enough to fit, it must not be beyond a certain strength.Some previously sold magnet sets were 37 times more powerful than the new regulations would allow, the CPSC notes.According to a magnet information center website published by U.S. CPSC, nearly 3,000 children and teenagers swallowed the magnets and had to be treated in emergency rooms nationwide between 2009 and 2013, including the death of a 19-month girl, Annaka Chaffin, after accidentally swallowing the magnets.“I will always think of Annie when it comes to this rule and the action the Commission has approved, and I am so deeply sorry for the Chaffin family’s loss,” CPSC Chairman Elliot Kaye said in a statement. “Also in our thoughts is Braylon Jordan from Louisiana, who had to battle through numerous surgeries as a 2-year old, after his intestines were perforated. Braylon is not alone, as many children and teenagers have suffered serious injuries after ingesting these hazardous magnets. As many families and the medical community well know.”If more than one of the powerful magnets are swallowed, they may attract to each other while moving through the intestines. This may cause intestines to twist, create blockages or tear intestinal walls. Often this results in the need for emergency surgery and can result in death or severe life-long health problems.Initial symptoms associated with swallowing the small magnets may be similar to that of a common flu, consisting of vomiting, diarrhea, and stomach pain, causing the problems not to be promptly recognized until certain medical examinations are done, further delaying treatment and allowing the magnets to attract.Magnet Recall BattleAn estimated 3 million magnet sets have been sold in the U.S. since 2010. Despite the regulatory efforts to place strong warning labels on the products and launch an educational campaign for consumers, reports of injuries have continued, leading safety regulators to conclude that placing stronger warnings on the products can not make them safe.The CPSC requested that 13 manufacturers of the magnetic ball toys issue voluntary recalls and stop sales in 2012.ย While 11 companies complied, the regulatory agency was forced to file rare administrative complaints against two manufacturers, seeking to force an involuntaryย Buckyball recallย andย Zen Magnets recall.The administrative complaints are a way for the CPSC to make a mandatory recall of a dangerous product, and this was the first time in 11 years the regulatory agency has had to take such action in an effort to protect consumers.In April 2013, the CPSC and a number of major retailers announced a Buckyball and Buckycube recall, calling for customers to return or get rid of the magnet sets.Inย July 2014, the CPSC reached a settlement agreement with makers of the Buckyball magnet sets which allows consumers who purchased the sets to receive a refund by visiting Buckyballsrecall.com.The makers of Zen magnets are still fighting to prevent having to offer customers refunds.The commission voted 4-0 to approve the new rules, with one abstention. Commissioner Ann Marie Buerkle said she did not think the new rules should come while the CPSC had an administrative enforcement case against the only remaining seller of the small magnet sets. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Buckyballs, Children, Infant Death, MagnetsMore Lawsuit Stories Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion July 8, 2026 Amazon Heated Socks Lawsuit Claims Defective Battery Combusted Resulting in House Fire July 8, 2026 Taxotere Watery Eyes Lawsuits Cleared To Move Forward Over Inadequate Side Effect Warnings July 8, 2026 0 Comments X/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (Posted: yesterday)Plaintiffs have requested that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidate all Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in the Central District of California for pretrial procedures.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITProclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (07/06/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026) Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (Posted: 2 days ago)An AngioDynamics Vortex port lawsuit alleges the implantable port catheter caused a South Carolina woman to suffer pulmonary embolisms and a serious infection requiring surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITAngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Claims Womanโs SmartPort Implants Caused Multiple Infections (06/23/2026)Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis (06/12/2026)Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (06/03/2026) Proclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (Posted: 3 days ago)A Texas man’s lawsuit claims the electrodes and battery of an Abbott spinal cord stimulator tried to push out of his skin, resulting in a severe infection and the need for surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (07/08/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)
Taxotere Watery Eyes Lawsuits Cleared To Move Forward Over Inadequate Side Effect Warnings July 8, 2026
Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (Posted: yesterday)Plaintiffs have requested that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidate all Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in the Central District of California for pretrial procedures.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITProclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (07/06/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)
Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (Posted: 2 days ago)An AngioDynamics Vortex port lawsuit alleges the implantable port catheter caused a South Carolina woman to suffer pulmonary embolisms and a serious infection requiring surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITAngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Claims Womanโs SmartPort Implants Caused Multiple Infections (06/23/2026)Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis (06/12/2026)Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (06/03/2026)
Proclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (Posted: 3 days ago)A Texas man’s lawsuit claims the electrodes and battery of an Abbott spinal cord stimulator tried to push out of his skin, resulting in a severe infection and the need for surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (07/08/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)