Ninja Pressure Cooker Explosion Left Texas Woman With Severe Burns, Lawsuit Alleges

Plaintiff says her injuries were a result of a defective design which led to the Ninja pressure cooker explosion

A woman who suffered severe burns from a Ninja pressure cooker explosion has filed a product liability lawsuit, alleging the device was sold with a defective and unreasonably dangerous design, since the advertised safety features fail to prevent it from opening while the contents are still pressurized.

The complaint (PDF) was brought by Gwendolyn Prater in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas on February 20, pursuing claims against SHarkNinja Operating, LLC, the manufacturer of the popular Ninja Foodi Pressure Cooker.

The case raises allegations similar to those presented in growing number of pressure cooker explosion lawsuits filed in recent months, each involving claims that modern electronic pressure cookers are not as safe as advertised, including Instant Pot, Crock Pot, Ninja pressure cookers and other products.

Learn More About

Pressure Cooker Lawsuits

Faulty and defective designs may cause a pressure cooker to explode, resulting in severe burns and injuries.

Learn More About this Lawsuit See If You Qualify For Compensation

Prater indicates she was using her Ninja pressure cooker when she activated the pressure release mechanism to add an ingredient. However, as the pressure was releasing, the lid opened and hot liquid forcefully exploded out of the device, causing her to suffer severe burns.

The lawsuit indicates the safety features built into the Ninja pressure cooker should have prevented the lid from ever opening before pressure inside was fully released.

“It was the duty of Defendant SharkNinja to design, manufacture, test, market, advertise, label, distribute, and sell Ninja Pressure Cookers so they are reasonably safe for foreseeable use,” Prater’s lawsuit states. “At the time the Ninja Pressure Cookers at issue left the control of Defendant SharkNinja and was sold, it contained one or more conditions that rendered it defective and unreasonably dangerous in light of its nature and intended use.”

Prater presents claims of strict product liability, negligence, and breach of warranty.

Pressure Cooker Explosion Lawsuits

Modern electronic pressure cookers have become increasingly popular in recent decades, amid marketing that has promoted advanced safety features that were supposed to prevent pressure cooker explosions that have plagued older, stove-top designs. Products have been marketed under a number of brand names, through social media, websites and home shopping stations.

Most of the problems involve similar pressure cooker burn injuries which occurred after the lid was removed while the contents were still under high pressure, typically resulting in burns covering a large percentage of the user’s body. However, other injuries linked to pressure cookers have included eye injuries, broken bones and other complications that resulted from electrocutions, spills or explosions.

As more of these electric pressure cookers have been introduced in recent years, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has issued several pressure cooker recalls over problems where lids were able to be opened while contents are under pressure, allowing hot contents to be expelled and causing a scald or burn injury to individuals in the immediate area.


"*" indicates required fields

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Suboxone Settlements Failed to Compensate Users Left With Tooth Decay or Tooth loss
Suboxone Settlements Failed to Compensate Users Left With Tooth Decay or Tooth loss (Posted today)

Although Suboxone settlements have been paid to resolve antitrust violations, users who suffered damages due to tooth decay from Suboxone film must pursue individual product liability lawsuits

Bard 3DMax Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin in April 2024
Bard 3DMax Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Set for Trial To Begin in April 2024 (Posted yesterday)

With thousands of Bard hernia mesh lawsuits pending in the federal court system, a fourth bellwether trial will be held in the spring, involving allegations that defects with Bard 3DMax caused painful and permanent injuries.