FDA Proposed Rule Seeks to Make Nonprescription Drugs More Broadly Available

Federal drug regulators have proposed a new rule that is designed to broaden access to nonprescription medications for Americans, which would convert some medications that were previously prescription-only available without a prescription in certain circumstances.

Last week, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced a new proposal to increase availability of non-prescription drugs in the Federal Register, outlining potential requirements that could be implemented to ensure appropriate self-selection or appropriate use of medications by consumers, without the supervision of a doctor.

Millions of people use nonprescription drug products to self-manage heath conditions every day. The proposed rule would broaden the range of nonprescription drugs available to consumers and allow them to โ€œself-treat certain common conditions.โ€

The agency said the proposed rule is intended to โ€œincrease options for the development of safe and effective nonprescription drugs.โ€ The agency has not mentioned any specific drugs which are currently targeted to be converted from prescription to nonprescription.

โ€œAs part of the FDAโ€™s ongoing efforts to improve public health, this proposal can broaden the types of drugs that can be approved as nonprescriptionโ€”increasing availability of drugs that would otherwise only be available by prescription,โ€ FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf, said in the press release.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

If finalized, the rule would expand options for consumers by establishing requirements for a drug company to submit a new application to bring a drug product to market for nonprescription use.

If the FDA finds the labeling is not sufficient to ensure consumers can choose a drug on their own and use the drug independently, the manufacturer may submit an application proposing an additional condition for nonprescription use that a consumer must successfully fulfill to obtain the nonprescription drug product.

In some cases, the drug maker could require a consumer to respond with specific answers to a set of questions on a self-selection test available by app or automated telephone system to purchase certain nonprescription drug products.

The main goal is for the FDA to allow for some nonprescription drug products to be available to consumers if they determine the product can be safe and effectively used by consumers without the supervision of a doctor.

The proposed rule will be open for public comment for 120 days after the date of publication in the Federal Register, or until October 26, 2022.

Comments can be submitted electronically through the electronic filing system https://www.regulations.gov or in writing to: Dockets Management Staff (HFA-305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.

Martha Garcia
Written by: Martha Garcia

Health & Medical Research Writer

Martha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Analysts expect wider use of breast reconstruction mesh through 2030, even as lawsuits raise questions about synthetic products, FDA approval and serious complications requiring additional surgery.
Olympus faces a lawsuit from a Chicago woman who says she developed a severe, life-threatening infection due to the design of its endoscopes, which she says can trap infectious material in their cracks and crevices.
A Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuit claims the chronic pain implants are defectively designed, causing a Louisiana woman to suffer shocks and pain, as well as dizziness and fainting spells.