Ohio State University Denies Liability in Elevator Lawsuit

Ohio State University has filed court documents denying liability in an elevator lawsuit that was filed by the family of a freshman who was killed in 2006, after he was crushed while trying to get out of a dormitory elevator that had became stuck between floors.

Andrew Polakowski was among 23 other passengers in the elevator when it became overloaded and the main brake failed. While he was trying to get out of the stalled elevator on the third floor, it suddenly descended with its doors open.

The lawsuit over the elevator accident was filed on January 9, 2009, alleging that Ohio State University was negligent in maintaining, inspecting and operating the elevator.

Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits
Hair-Dye-Cancer-Lawsuits

Subsequent investigations found that the elevator was not capable of holding the amount of weight it was supposed to, there was no overload warning system or safety device to prevent it from falling while the doors were open, the counter-weight was inadequate and a load-weighing device on the elevator was disconnected.

In their responsive pleadings to the elevator lawsuit, the University has taken the position that the student’s own negligence caused or contributed to his death. They claim that the 18 year old was partially responsible for overcrowding the elevator which caused it to become stuck between floors, and assumed the risk of injury when he decided to ride on the elevator.

Under Ohio law, if a plaintiff’s own negligence is found to be more than 50% responsible for his injury, it is a complete bar to any recovery. However, if the plaintiff’s negligence is 50% or less responsible, the amount of damages would only be reduced in proportion of his negligence. 


0 Comments


Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

MORE TOP STORIES

In the six months since a Bard hernia mesh settlement agreement was reached, at least two dozen new lawsuits have been brought, as the implants continue to fail and require revision surgery.
As new BioZorb lawsuits continue to be filed over complications with the recalled breast tissue markers, lawyers indicate they are on track for the first of four test cases to go before a jury in September 2025.
Women pursuing Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits will have to provide documentary proof of their diagnosis and the versions of the birth control shot they received within 120 days of filing their case.