Oppenheimer Fund Lawsuit Settled for $20M

OppenheimerFunds Inc. has reached a $20 million settlement with the state of Oregon, which accused the company of investment fraud over the management of a college investment plan that lost $36 million.

Oregon’s attorney general and treasurer filed the Oppenheimer Fund lawsuit in April, seeking to recover $36.2 million in losses caused by the collapse of the Oppenheimer Core Bond Fund. Although the Oppenheimer fund was promoted as conservative, the company allegedly took speculative risks similar to those of a hedge fund, resulting in substantial losses for the state’s 529 college savings fund.

OppenheimerFunds was accused of making inappropriate bond investments that resulted in massive losses during the 2008 market downturn. In agreeing to the settlement, OppenheimerFunds denies any wrongdoing.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

Similar Oppenheimer lawsuits and arbitration claims have been filed over investor losses in the Oppenheimer Champion Income Fund, which is a high-yield bond fund offered by the firm to individual investors.

Starting in July 2008, the value of the Oppenheimer Champion Income Fund began to decline as the credit markets fell apart. When Lehman Brothers and AIG collapsed in September 2008, the value of the fund’s shares fell even further, ending the year with losses of 78% in 2008.

Some individual investors have filed stock fraud arbitration claims over Oppenheimer mutual fund losses through the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA), while others are taking part in an Oppenheimer class action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in February. The class action lawsuit alleges that the firm failed to adhere to the stated objective of not taking any undue risk, failed to have adequate controls in place to prevent excessive risk and failed to disclose the extent of the risk posed by investment in the bond fund. The Oppenheimer lawsuit seeks to represent all investors who purchased shares between January 26, 2007 and December 6, 2008.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury
Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury (Posted today)

Complaint comes as a panel of federal judges are scheduled to hear oral arguments later this month, to determine whether all AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide should be centralized before one judge.

Depo-Provera Meningioma Brain Tumors Risks May Have Been Ignored by Pfizer for Decades
Depo-Provera Meningioma Brain Tumors Risks May Have Been Ignored by Pfizer for Decades (Posted 4 days ago)

After decades of medical research and reported Depo-Provera side effects, Pfizer should have known that its birth control shot increases the risks of meningioma brain tumors, yet failed to warn women or the medical community.