Lawsuit Filed Against CVS and Sunbeam After Oster Pressure Cooker Exploded Without Warning

A product liability lawsuit has been filed against Sunbeam and CVS Pharmacy, indicating that an Oster pressure cooker exploded without warning, leaving a Florida woman with severe burns that covered her face, chest and arms.

Germania Madera filed the complaint (PDF) in Miami-Dade County Circuit Court in Florida on February 15, indicating that her Oster pressure cooker was defective and unreasonably dangerous. Sunbeam Products, Inc., CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Navarro Discount Pharmacy, LLC are each named as defendants in the lawsuit, over their role in manufacturing and selling the pressure cooker.

According to the lawsuit, Madera was cooking with the Oster pressure cooker in January 2020, when it suddenly malfunctioned and the lid exploded off, showering her with the scalding hot contents, which covered her face and body.

Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer
Pressure-Cooker-Eplosion-Lawsuit-Lawyer

Madera claims the pressure cooker was sold in a defective state and was unreasonably dangerous under Florida law. The defects included a failure to perform as safely as an ordinary consumer would expect; a failure to include a safe lid-locking system; a failure to include safety features that could have prevented the explosion; and that its lid top is prone to coming off and exploding during normal use.

The lawsuit also notes that it lacks sufficient label warnings to alert consumers to the risks of using the pressure cooker.

โ€œThe [Oster] Pressure Cookerโ€™s scalding hot contents seared Plaintiffโ€™s body, causing serious and permanent burn injuries, excruciating pain, suffering, scarring, and continued bodily harm,โ€ Maderaโ€™s lawsuit states. โ€œThe injuries sustained by Plaintiffโ€ฆwould not have occurred but for the defects present in the [Oster] Pressure Cooker.โ€

Pressure Cooker Lawsuits Over Safety Feature Failures

The case joins dozens of similarย pressure cooker lawsuitsย filed in recent months, each raising allegations about unreasonably dangerous designs and defective safety features on several modern devices, including Crock-Pot, Instant Pot, Ninja Foodi and other brands.

Most of the accidents involve severeย pressure cooker burn injuriesย that occurred after the lid was removed while the contents are still under high pressure, typically resulting in burns covering a large percentage of the userโ€™s body. However, other injuries linked to pressure cookers have included eye injuries, broken bones and other complications that resulted from electrocutions, spills or explosions.

As more of these electric pressure cookers have been introduced in recent years, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission has issued several pressure cooker recalls over problems where lids were able to be opened while contents are under pressure, allowing hot contents to be expelled and causing a scald or burn injury to individuals in the immediate area.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Insulet is removing certain Omnipod 5 insulin pump pods from use following a surge in reports of insulin delivery failures that raise risks of diabetic ketoacidosis and other serious complications.
A Florida womanโ€™s lawsuit alleges that Abbott Laboratories and Boston Scientific altered their SCS device batteries, firmware and stimulation features without adequate safety testing approved by the FDA.
A Depo-Provera lawsuit filed against Pfizer says the manufacturer knew Depo-Provera could stimulate brain tumor growth before the birth control shots hit the market, yet failed to warn doctors and patients.