Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Pennsylvania Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Filings Down After Law Changes April 28, 2009 AboutLawsuits Add Your CommentsSince new state laws went into effect in 2003 regarding the filing of medical malpractice lawsuits in Pennsylvania, the average number of new complaints filed each year is down 41% when compared to the years before the procedural changes were adopted.The Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts (AOPC) released new statistics on April 9, 2009, regarding the state’s medical malpractice case filings and verdicts for 2008.The number of new malpractice lawsuits filed has remained stable in recent years, with 1,602 filing in 2008. However, when compared to the “base years” of 2000 through 2002, before the new rules went into effect, the filings are down substantially.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONWhile statistics show a 41% decline statewide, in the judicial district of Philadelphia, where the largest number of cases are filed every year, malpractice lawsuits are down 54% over the same period.The decline in medical malpractice litigation in Pennsylvania is attributed to two new procedural rules that were adopted by the state in 2003. The rules were designed to ease the effects of rising malpractice insurance premiums while maintaining access to the courts for the most egregious cases.The first rule adopted requires that the plaintiff file a “certificate of merit” from a medical professional that establishes that the medical treatment fell below the applicable standard of care.The second rule limited plaintiffs to filing their complaint in the county where the alleged malpractice occurred. This prevented venue shopping, where cases could be filed in more favorable counties where juries tend to award larger damages, such as Philadelphia.โThe latest statistics provide additional evidence that the sharp drop in medical malpractice litigation, which began in 2003, was not a temporary correction, but a sustained and stable response to the procedural rule changes adopted by the Supreme Court and the statutory changes enacted by the General Assembly,โ said Chief Justice of Pennsylvania Ronald D. Castille, in a press release issued by the Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts.Several smaller counties in Pennsylvania have seen increases in the number of filings after the changes, largely caused by the requirement that cases be filed where the malpractice occurred. The largest increase was seen in Montgomery County, where the number of medical malpractice lawsuit filings increased from an average of about 20 cases per year during the “base years”, to an average of 97 per year since the changes when into effect. Tags: Malpractice, Medical Malpractice, Pennsylvania Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial September 9, 2026 Lawsuit Alleges Apple AirTag Tracked Vehicle Location for Months September 9, 2026 Chlorpyrifos Autism Link May Involve Immune, Inflammatory Gene Changes: Study September 9, 2026 0 Comments EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: yesterday)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026) Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (Posted: 2 days ago)An Ozempic NAION lawsuit blames the diabetes drug for a woman’s sudden loss of vision and alleges the manufacturer failed to warn doctors of the risks.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic NAION Lawsuit Filed Over Sudden, Permanent Vision Loss (08/03/2026)Link Between NAION and Ozempic, Wegovy Will Be Focus of Early Discovery in GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuits (07/16/2026)Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges (06/16/2026) Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (Posted: 6 days ago)Certain Infinion CX spinal cord stimulator leads from Boston Scientific have been recalled after more than 1,000 serious injuries were linked to fractures that may disrupt stimulation and require additional surgery.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITJudge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026)Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (08/24/2026)
Jury Awards $40M Port Catheter Lawsuit Payout in Bard PowerPort Bellwether Trial (Posted: yesterday)The second Bard PowerPort lawsuit bellwether trial has ended in a $40 million verdict for the plaintiff who had the implant removed after the catheter broke and traveled to her heart.MORE ABOUT: BARD POWERPORT LAWSUITNearly 4,000 Bard PowerPort Lawsuits Are Awaiting Outcome of Upcoming Bellwether Trials (08/12/2026)Bard PowerPort Lawyers Make Final Preparations for Next MDL Bellwether Trial (07/17/2026)New Trial Sought for First Bard PowerPort Bellwether Lawsuit (06/05/2026)
Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Sudden Eyesight Loss (Posted: 2 days ago)An Ozempic NAION lawsuit blames the diabetes drug for a woman’s sudden loss of vision and alleges the manufacturer failed to warn doctors of the risks.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic NAION Lawsuit Filed Over Sudden, Permanent Vision Loss (08/03/2026)Link Between NAION and Ozempic, Wegovy Will Be Focus of Early Discovery in GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuits (07/16/2026)Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges (06/16/2026)
Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Recall Issued After More Than 1,000 Serious Injuries (Posted: 6 days ago)Certain Infinion CX spinal cord stimulator leads from Boston Scientific have been recalled after more than 1,000 serious injuries were linked to fractures that may disrupt stimulation and require additional surgery.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITJudge Allows Back Stimulator Lawsuits Against Boston Scientific to Be Directly Filed in MDL (08/31/2026)Hearing on Abbott, Nevro SCS Lawsuit MDL Centralization Set for September 2026 (08/26/2026)Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (08/24/2026)