Lawsuit Alleges Recalled Philips CPAP PE-PUR Foam Exposed Users to Risk of Cancer, Organ Failure, Other Health Effects

Over four million users of sleep apnea machines with Philips CPAP PE-PER foam were exposed to cancer causing chemicals and particles

Defective sound abatement foam in millions of recalled Philips CPAP machines could put users at risk of cancer and organ damage, as well as headaches, asthma, inflammatory responses and other serious side effects, according to allegations raised in a recently filed lawsuit.

Nine plaintiffs filed a complaint (PDF) seeking class action status against Koninklijke Philips and its Philips North America subsidiaries on September 3, indicating the manufacturer knew for months about potential health risks associated with polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) foam used to reduce noise and vibrations in Philips DreamStation, CPAP, BiPAP and mechanical ventilators sold over the past decade, but delayed issuing a recall or warnings.

A massive Philips CPAP PE-PUR foam recall was issued in June 2021, impacting an estimated 3.5 million devices used for treatment of sleep apnea and other respiratory conditions. The action was taken due to a risk that the sound abatement foam may breakdown and degrade, releasing black particles and toxic chemicals directly into the lungs of users relying on the breathing machines.

Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit

Was your Philips CPAP machine recalled?

Millions of recalled Philips DreamStation, CPAP, BiPAP and ventilator machines may release toxic foam particles and chemicals into the air pathway.

Learn More About this Lawsuit See If You Qualify For Compensation

Exposure to the particles and gases released by the CPAP machine PE-PUR foam has been linked to reports of cancer, severe respiratory problems and other health complications, according to allegations raised in a growing number of similar Philips CPAP machine lawsuits and class action claims filed in courts nationwide in recent weeks.

“Prior to issuing the Recall Notice, Philips received complaints regarding the presence of black debris/particles within the airpath circuit of its devices (extending from the device outlet, humidifier, tubing, and mask),” the lawsuit states. “Philips also received reports of headaches, upper airway irritation, cough, chest pressure and sinus infection from users of these devices.”

Despite those warning signs Philips chose to inform investors about risks associated with the sound abatement foam in a quarterly earnings report on April 26, weeks before the recall was announced. However, users were not warned of the potential side effects of CPAP PE-PUR foam exposure until June 14.

In the wake of the recall, Philips did not provide replacement CPAP machines or offer to immediately repair the PE-PUR foam problems. The company also did not provide users the funds to buy a new CPAP machine, leaving them without much-needed breathing assistance and with rising fear of using the devices they still had. It was not until last week that a Philips Respironics CPAP replacement program was announced, which may take up to a year to complete.

The lawsuit seeks nationwide class action status for anyone who purchased or leased one of the recalled devices manufactured before April 26, 2021 and recalled on June 14, 2021.

On June 30, the FDA issued a warning about exposure to the CPAP foam, urging consumers who were not relying on the devices for life-sustaining therapy to immediately stop using the recalled sleep apnea machines and contact their doctors to decide on alternative treatments for the condition.

For individuals reliant on recalled Philips ventilators, which provide mechanical breathing assistance that is often life-sustaining, the FDA indicates consumers should not stop using the device until they speak with a doctor, and recommended that inline bacterial filters be used to help catch the foam particles before they enter the air pathway. However, even this may pose risks, since it is unclear whether the filters are safe or effective, and may increase the resistance of airflow through the device.

Koninklijke Philips, N.V. generated over $23 billion in revenue last year, and is expected to face massive liability from lawsuits and CPAP machine settlements over the next few years. In the earnings report issued prior to announcing the recall, the company advised investors it had taken a provision of about $295 million to cover the costs of the recall, which will likely only cover a small fraction of the compensation and damages the company will ultimately be required to pay.

Philips DreamStation Lawsuits:

Did you or a loved one experience problems from exposure to CPAP PE-PUR foam?



  • AjazNovember 29, 2021 at 10:38 pm

    On the inside proportion of the machine if to add water to increase humidity there is a silver metal round plate attached to the inside of the container a creamy coloured powdery material could be seen stuck on top of the silver plate is this another defect in the machine or was it purposely put in the machine to cause harm I don’t now please tell me if you see it on your machine thank you.

  • JeffOctober 20, 2021 at 10:23 am

    Only found out about the recall via a FACEBOOK posting, that showed a picture of my DreamStation! I called my physician immediately. They knew about the recall, but didn't contact me, nor, did I receive any mailing/notice from Phillips. What miffs me the most is that Summit Sleep Service didn't mail, call, e-mail me notice about the recall.

  • RobertOctober 6, 2021 at 6:27 pm

    My old CPAP machine was damaged in November 2020, it was replaced by a DreamStation (even though Philips knew about the defects). Now I have to go without any CPAP machine unless I pay out of pocket I agree with prior postings that Philips should bear the cost of replacement, and not expect all of those that need machine to wait 12 months or more.

  • MargaretSeptember 14, 2021 at 6:07 pm


Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Court Allows Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits To Be Filed in Bundled Complaint by June 14, 2024
Court Allows Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits To Be Filed in Bundled Complaint by June 14, 2024 (Posted 2 days ago)

A federal judge is allowing plaintiffs to file large numbers of Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits in one bundled complaint, to meet a potential two-year statute of limitations deadline, with the ability to flesh those claims out in more detail at a later date.