Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Roblox Lawsuit Families are filing Roblox lawsuits after children were targeted by predators for grooming, sextortion, sexual abuse, or exploitation on the platform. Learn who qualifies, what cases allege, and how to file a confidential claim.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Replacement Foam For Recalled Philips CPAP Devices May Have Problems of Its Own, FDA Warns Inspection reveals Philips Respironics knew about sound abatement foam degradation problems as early as November 2015, and management took no corrective actions until April 2021 November 15, 2021 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Following a massive Philips Respironics CPAP recall issued in June 2021, due to problems with sound abatement foam degrading and releasing particles into the machine air pathways, federal regulators now indicate that a proposed foam replacement material may also place users health at risk, and that the manufacturer has known about the CPAP foam deterioration issues for years. More than 15 million Philips DreamStation, CPAP, BiPAP and mechanical ventilators were sold with a polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) foam that was intended to reduce noise and vibrations while the machines were used. However, due to serious potential long-term side effects from breathing the Philips CPAP foam as it degrades and breaks down, consumers have been told to immediately stop using the devices, unless they are needed for life-sustaining therapy. Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Following a recently conducted inspection of a Philips Respironics manufacturing facility to determine what may have caused or contributed to the foam issues, the FDA issued a scathing report (PDF), which outlines several troubling observations about how long the company has known about the problems, and raises concerns about a plan to replace the foam in recalled CPAP machines with a new material, which may also release certain harmful chemicals. Philips CPAP Foam Replacement Material May Also Pose Health Risks In September 2021, a controversial Philips DreamStation CPAP recall repair program was announced by the manufacturer, indicating they would be “reworking” machines to replace the sound abatement foam with another material. However, concerns immediately emerged, since the company failed to provide any details to establish how these repaired CPAP machines would not exposure users to similar risks. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a press release on November 12, warning that they are also now concerned about the proposed silicone sound abatement foam being used to replace the polyester-based polyurethane (PE-PUR) foam, indicating that it may also release dangerous chemicals. A similar device marketed outside the United States with a silicone-based CPAP foam reportedly failed safety tests and released certain “chemicals of concern”, known as volatile organic compounds (VOC), which may directly enter the breathing machines’ airways and be fed into the lungs of users. Therefore, the FDA has requested that Philips Respironics retain an independent laboratory to perform additional testing to determine what health risks may be posed by the replacement silicone foam. “The FDA is aware that patients have already received devices with silicone-based foam as part of the repair and replacement program,” according to the statement. “At this time, the agency does not have sufficient information to conclude whether the silicone-based foam being used in repaired devices poses any risk to patients in the U.S.” While the agency is not recommending that individuals who participated in the repair and foam replacement program discontinue use of their machines, they are urging individuals with concerns to speak with their doctor and pledged to communicate the results of Philips’ additional testing to the public as soon as they are available. Problems with CPAP Foam Degrading Known Since 2015 The recent FDA inspection also uncovered troubling information that suggests Philips Respironics was aware of potential foam deterioration in CPAP, BiPAP and Trilogy ventilators for years, yet company management failed to take any corrective actions until April 2021. As early as October 2015, emails between Philips and a raw foam supplier documented knowledge of polyester polyurethane foam degrading. The FDA indicates that this was was later confirmed by the supplier in August 2016. Another email message from April 2018 confirmed that Philips was aware it had received complaints related to the foam deterioration, including indication that disintegrated foam had been pulled into a ventilator and patient’s air pathways. However, no steps were taken to change the machine design and polyester polyurethane foam continued to be used in devices. The FDA also indicates that it conducted a search of all consumer complaints received by Philips since 2008, and identified at least 222,000 reports involving keywords that suggest issues with foam deterioration, particles or black foam debris being found in the machines or air pathways. However, no formal actions were taken to look into the problems, or warn consumers. “No further investigation, health hazard evaluation, risk analysis, or design review was performed or documented by your firm regarding potential polyester polyurethane foam degradation on any Philips Sleep and Respiratory Care products,” the inspection report states. “Additionally, no further preventative maintenance servicing procedures were implemented by your firm.” There are now hundreds of Philips CPAP lawsuits and class action claims being filed against the makers of the sleep apnea machine, alleging that users were exposed to an increased of cancer, severe respiratory problems and other health complications after breathing chemicals and gases released as the foam breaks down. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has established consolidated pretrial proceedings for the Philips CPAP recall litigation, centralizing the claims before U.S. District Judge Timothy J. Savage in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Cancer, CPAP, Medical Device Recall, Philips, Respiratory, Silicone, Sleep Apnea More Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit Stories Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024 Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October July 11, 2024 Philips OmniLab Advanced+ Ventilator Recall Issued Over Loss of Therapy Risks July 1, 2024 0 Comments EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Judge To Hear Depo-Provera Lawsuit Preemption Arguments on Monday (Posted: today) A federal judge will hear oral arguments on Monday over whether Depo-Provera lawsuit failure to warn claims are preempted by federal law. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLink Between Depo-Provera and Meningioma Brain Tumors Ignored by Pfizer, Plaintiffs Indicate (09/22/2025)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Create Lifelong Meningioma Fears Among Women (09/17/2025)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Significantly Increased Among Women Over 31: Study (09/03/2025) Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuit Alleges Problems With Predatory Drivers Were Known for Years (Posted: yesterday) Rideshare company Lfyt faces a sexual assault lawsuit from a Georgia woman who says a driver exposed himself after she ordered a ride home from a babysitting job. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITTwo Uber Sexual Assault Bellwether Trials To Be Held in North Carolina (09/22/2025)Uber Passenger Sexual Assault Trial Underway in California State Court (09/10/2025)Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit Set To Go Before Jury in Jan. 2026 (09/04/2025) Exploding Isopropyl Bottles Make Smokeless Fire Pits Inherently Dangerous, Lawsuits Claim (Posted: 2 days ago) Lawsuits allege tabletop fire pits are inherently dangerous because they encourage consumers to fuel them with ordinary isopropyl bottles, which can explode in seconds and cause devastating burn injuries. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITTabletop Fire Pit Recall Announced by Five Below Amid Growing Number of Burn Injury Lawsuits (09/18/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Portable Fire Pit Sold on Amazon.com Caused Flashback Burn Injuries (09/12/2025)Wayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (09/05/2025)
Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024
Judge To Hear Depo-Provera Lawsuit Preemption Arguments on Monday (Posted: today) A federal judge will hear oral arguments on Monday over whether Depo-Provera lawsuit failure to warn claims are preempted by federal law. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLink Between Depo-Provera and Meningioma Brain Tumors Ignored by Pfizer, Plaintiffs Indicate (09/22/2025)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Create Lifelong Meningioma Fears Among Women (09/17/2025)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Significantly Increased Among Women Over 31: Study (09/03/2025)
Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuit Alleges Problems With Predatory Drivers Were Known for Years (Posted: yesterday) Rideshare company Lfyt faces a sexual assault lawsuit from a Georgia woman who says a driver exposed himself after she ordered a ride home from a babysitting job. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITTwo Uber Sexual Assault Bellwether Trials To Be Held in North Carolina (09/22/2025)Uber Passenger Sexual Assault Trial Underway in California State Court (09/10/2025)Uber Sexual Assault Lawsuit Set To Go Before Jury in Jan. 2026 (09/04/2025)
Exploding Isopropyl Bottles Make Smokeless Fire Pits Inherently Dangerous, Lawsuits Claim (Posted: 2 days ago) Lawsuits allege tabletop fire pits are inherently dangerous because they encourage consumers to fuel them with ordinary isopropyl bottles, which can explode in seconds and cause devastating burn injuries. MORE ABOUT: TABLETOP FIRE PIT LAWSUITTabletop Fire Pit Recall Announced by Five Below Amid Growing Number of Burn Injury Lawsuits (09/18/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Portable Fire Pit Sold on Amazon.com Caused Flashback Burn Injuries (09/12/2025)Wayfair Fire Pit Lawsuit Links Flame Jetting Explosion to Defective Design (09/05/2025)