Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Sleepnet CPAP and BiPap Mask Recall Issued Over Potential Interference from Magnets New warning labels will be added to recalled Sleepnet CPAP and BiPAP masks equipped with magnets, indicating that consumers with medical implants should avoid using the products due to serious health risks. March 20, 2024 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsA global recall has been announced for all Sleepnet CPAP and BiPAP masks equipped with magnets, which may interfere with other medical implants, causing them to malfunction or move, potentially resulting in serious injuries or death.The Sleepnet CPAP and BiPap mask recall was announced by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on March 18, impacting the Mojo, Mojo 2, iQ 2 and Phantom 2 masks, which are equipped with magnets to help them stay in position. However, the CPAP mask magnets can interfere with certain medical implants if they come within close proximity.The problem was discovered during post market surveillance, according to Sleepnet, which first announced a global recall of the CPAP and BiPAP masks at the beginning of March. However, the FDA has now given the action a Class I recall designation, indicating the problem could result in severe injuries or deaths.The FDA and Sleepnet indicate no reports of injuries or deaths have been linked to the recalled masks.โIf a patient or anyone (example: household members, bed partners, caregivers, etc.) in close physical contact with the mask has an active medical implant or metallic implant that will interact with magnets, these masks with magnets should not be used,โ according to the recall notice, which indicates implants could include pacemakers, defibrillators, nerve stimulators, stents, shunts, dental implants and a variety of other products.Sleepnet indicates that it is adding new contraindication and safety warnings on the device labels.Safety Concerns Surrounding CPAP Masks and MachinesThe recall is the latest blow to the CPAP industry and users of the breathing assistance devices since a Philips CPAP recall was issued in July 2021, impacting millions of sleep apnea machines.Over the past three years, thousands of individuals have already come forward to pursue a Philips CPAP lawsuit, alleging that exposure to the toxic foam particles caused them to develop various types of cancer, lung damage and respiratory damage.Stay Up-to-Date AboutPhilips CPAP Recall LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreStay Up-to-Date AboutPhilips CPAP Recall LawsuitsAboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Philips CPAP recall lawsuit updates or developments."*" indicates required fieldsEmail* SIGN ME UPΔ Learn MoreSince that recall, there have also been other CPAP mask recalls issued due the same magnet problem.In September 2022, Philips issued a nearly identical CPAP mask recall for several types of magnet-equipped face masks following dozens of complaints, and reports of serious injuries. Another, very similar, ResMed CPAP mask recall was announced earlier this year, affecting more than 20 million masks containing magnets, after reports of several injuries.Sleepnet CPAP and BiPAP Mask RecallThe recall affects all Mojo Full Face Vented Mask, Mojo Full Face NonโVented Mask, Mojo 2 Full Face Vented Mask, Mojo 2 Full Face Nonโ Vented Mask, Mojo 2 Full Face AAV NonโVented Mask, iQ 2 Nasal Mask, and Phantom 2 Nasal Masks, regardless of lot or UDI number. The masks have been distributed worldwide since 2006.โIf a patient, or anyone in close physical contact, has an active medical implant or metallic implant, they should contact their mask supplier to find a replacement mask that does not include magnets,โ the manufacturer advises. โIf the patient is unsure whether or not they should use the mask, they should consult their physician or the manufacturer of their implant.โThe company advises consumers with questions to contact Sleepnet at hkoppusetty@sleepnetcorp.com or call 1โ800โ742โ3646. Adverse events linked to the use of the recalled masks should be reported to the FDAโs MedWatch Adverse Event Reporting Program. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: CPAP, CPAP Mask Recall, Magnets, Medical ImplantMore Philips CPAP Recall Lawsuit Stories Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024 Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October July 11, 2024 Philips OmniLab Advanced+ Ventilator Recall Issued Over Loss of Therapy Risks July 1, 2024 0 CommentsCompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (Posted: yesterday)Plaintiffs have requested that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidate all Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in the Central District of California for pretrial procedures.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITProclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (07/06/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026) Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (Posted: 2 days ago)An AngioDynamics Vortex port lawsuit alleges the implantable port catheter caused a South Carolina woman to suffer pulmonary embolisms and a serious infection requiring surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITAngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Claims Womanโs SmartPort Implants Caused Multiple Infections (06/23/2026)Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis (06/12/2026)Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (06/03/2026) Proclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (Posted: 3 days ago)A Texas man’s lawsuit claims the electrodes and battery of an Abbott spinal cord stimulator tried to push out of his skin, resulting in a severe infection and the need for surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (07/08/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)
Lawsuits Between Philips and SoClean Over CPAP Machine Problems To Be Trial Ready by July 2025 September 3, 2024
Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (Posted: yesterday)Plaintiffs have requested that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidate all Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in the Central District of California for pretrial procedures.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITProclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (07/06/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)
Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (Posted: 2 days ago)An AngioDynamics Vortex port lawsuit alleges the implantable port catheter caused a South Carolina woman to suffer pulmonary embolisms and a serious infection requiring surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITAngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Claims Womanโs SmartPort Implants Caused Multiple Infections (06/23/2026)Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis (06/12/2026)Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (06/03/2026)
Proclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (Posted: 3 days ago)A Texas man’s lawsuit claims the electrodes and battery of an Abbott spinal cord stimulator tried to push out of his skin, resulting in a severe infection and the need for surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (07/08/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)