Short Term Plavix and Aspirin Therapy May Increase Risk Of Heart Attacks: Study

Certain heart patients may see little benefit from taking a combination of aspirin and Plavix short term after receiving a heart stent, yet could face an increased risk of heart attacks, according to the findings of new research. 

South Korean researchers published a study this week in the medical journal The Lancet, which looked at potential short term use of what is known as dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), among individuals with acute coronary syndrome who had recently received a drug-eluting stent (DES).

Coronary stents are often implanted in patients with blockages in the arteries due to heart disease. The stents prop the artery open to keep the supply of blood to the heart flowing. Sometimes they are bare metal and other types are coated with heart medications.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

However, in some cases a blood clot can form in the stent, which would reduce the flow of blood to the heart and could also break off and cause a pulmonary embolism, so some patients are prescribed blood thinners, typically being placed on a DAPT regimen that includes Aspirin and a blood thinner like Plavix, Effient or Brilinta.

Current medical guidelines call for patients implanted with a heart stent to be put on a combination of Plavix and aspirin for 12 months or longer. However, the researchers in this latest study sought to see if a shorter term, six month, regimen, would be beneficial given the bleeding injury risks inherent to all blood thinners.

The study involved a randomized, open-label trial at 31 facilities in South Korea that involved 2,712 patients; 1,357 of whom were assigned to the six month DAPT program, and 1,355 who took the drugs for 12 months or longer. Most of the patients were given Plavix and aspirin.

Researchers found that the six month group had more than double the rate of heart attacks than the 12 month group. They also found that patients who only stayed on the drugs for six months were 50% more likely to suffer stent thrombosis.

“The increased risk of myocardial infarction with 6-month DAPT and the wide non-inferiority margin prevent us from concluding that short-term DAPT is safe in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with current generation DES,” the researchers concluded. “Prolonged DAPT in patients with acute coronary syndrome without excessive risk of bleeding should remain the standard of care.”

The study comes about a year and a half after another group of researchers found somewhat opposing findings.

In November 2016, a group of Asian and European researchers published a study in The BMJ which warned that DAPT does not appear to prevent heart problems in patients implanted with stents at all, and that long-term blood thinner use increased the risk of bleeding in those patients.

According to the older study’s findings, there was little to no difference in the decrease of heart problems whether patients took the drugs long term or short term. What the researchers discovered was that those patients who were on aspirin and Plavix for a longer period of time had an increased risk of bleeding events. However, their risk of heart problems stayed the same as if they had only been prescribed the drugs for a short period of time.

Plavix Health Risks

Plavix (clopidrogrel) is a blockbuster medication that has been used by millions of people in the United States and is commonly prescribed to prevent blood platelets from sticking together and forming clots. There are between 2.5 million and 3 million Plavix prescriptions handed out each month in the U.S.

In November 2014 the FDA issued a Plavix safety warning  after researchers found that Plavix use after the placement of a stent could increase the risk of death.

In recent years, additional concerns have emerged about the potential side effects of Plavix and whether many of these prescriptions may have been unnecessary due to genetic resistance to the medication.

In August 2009, researchers from the University of Maryland identified a gene variant found in about one-third of the population that may signal a reduced effectiveness of Plavix. People with the CYP2C19 variant have reduced functioning of a liver enzyme that is supposed to convert Plavix from its inactive form to its active form, potentially making Plavix ineffective at reducing the risk of blood clots.

Unnecessary use of Plavix may expose individuals to an increased risk of gastrointestinal bleeding, severe ulcers, a rare blood disorder known as thrombotic thrombocytopenic pupura (TTP) and other injuries.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Federal indictments against MLB and NBA players reveal how legalized sports betting has blurred the line between competition and addiction, fueling corruption on the field and lawsuits off it.
A California woman had to undergo brain surgery to remove a tumor she says was caused by Depo-Provera side effects, according to a recently filed lawsuit.
Recall notices are being sent to Amazon customers who purchased tabletop fire pits linked to severe burn injuries, as lawsuits continue to mount against the company and other manufacturers over the allegedly defective and dangerous products.