Jury Awards $540K in Pradaxa Trial Against Boehringer Ingelheim

A Connecticut jury has determined that Boehringer Ingelheim should pay more than half a million dollars in compensatory damages to a New York man who suffered a severe bleeding injury from Pradaxa, and that additional punitive damages should be awarded to punish the drug maker for failing to adequately warn consumers and the medical community about the risks associated with the controversial anticoagulant.

The verdict was handed down on Friday, in a Pradaxa lawsuit filed by Eugene Roberto, including $42,645 for past medical expenses and $500,000 for non-economic damages, such as pain and suffering. The court will now determine the amount of punitive damages during an upcoming hearing, which may be up to two times the amount of the compensatory damages award.

After using Pradaxa, Roberto indicated that he suffered a life-threatening upper gastrointestinal bleeding event on January 30, 2014. As a result of the bleeding injury, he was hospitalized for 10 days and underwent months of recovery.

Did You Know?

AT&T Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

More than 73 million customers of AT&T may have had their names, addresses, phone numbers, Social Security numbers and other information released on the dark web due to a massive AT&T data breach. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

Roberto had a 40-year history of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which his lawsuit indicated put him at a higher risk of bleeding events when taking Pradaxa. However, the lawsuit claimed the manufacturer failed to warn users and the medical community that GERD placed patients at an increased risk of bleeding problems.

The trial lasted from April 30 to May 17 in Harford Superior Court in Connecticut, where about 3,000 similar Pradaxa lawsuits are currently pending and awaiting trial.

Pradaxa was the first member of a new generation of anticoagulants released in recent years, which did not have a safe and effective reversal agent when first introduced, leaving many doctors helpless to control or stop bleeding problems that develop among users.

Boehringer Ingelheim has promoted Pradaxa as a superior alternatives to warfarin, which has been the go-to treatment for blood clots for decades among individuals with atrial fibrillation. However, the blood thinning effects of warfarin can be quickly reversed with a dose of vitamin K and fresh frozen plasma.

Although the drug maker previously reached an Pradaxa settlement agreement in 2014, which resolved thousands of claims pending at that time, Boehringer Ingelheim has failed to settle the claims currently pending in Connecticut and taken a series of claims to trial.

This verdict is the second loss for the drug maker, after a prior jury awarded $1.25 million in a wrongful death lawsuit last year that went to trial in West Virginia.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this article indicated that the jury was still determining whether to award punitive damages. However, the jury already determined that punitive damages are warranted, and the court will award those damages in an amount up to two times the compensatory damages following an upcoming hearing.

1 Comments

  • NancyJuly 23, 2019 at 2:15 pm

    Boehringer Ingelheim sent me a settlement and release agreement for killing my dog, Moose. Their distemper vaccine is what killed him. Boehringer will pay 3/4 of my bill but not the full bill. In their release agreement if signed I am not allowed to say any bad or sue them. Boehringer is doing for pets as it has done for Humans. Pets are dying all over the world from there vaccines. Boehringer i[Show More]Boehringer Ingelheim sent me a settlement and release agreement for killing my dog, Moose. Their distemper vaccine is what killed him. Boehringer will pay 3/4 of my bill but not the full bill. In their release agreement if signed I am not allowed to say any bad or sue them. Boehringer is doing for pets as it has done for Humans. Pets are dying all over the world from there vaccines. Boehringer is lobbying Congress now for making it mandatory that all pet owners MUST Vaccinate their animals with Distemper and LEPTO which has proven to kill household pets and farm animals. I saw in The State of NC and ranchers are in Lawsuit against Boehringer for their vaccines killing 1000 head of cattle. MY FEAR IF BOEHRINGER is IF not stopped SOME of our "best friends will Die a slow painful death as my Australian Shepeard did Moose. Within a week and a 1/2 of his distemper shot, he died each day each hour . to the point he could not move. I took him to several animal centers to seek help. My medical bills for my best friend are high, but most of all my best friend is dead and today I will go to pick up his ashes. CAN YOU HELP ME and all the pet owners who now fear these vaccines? Thank you for taking the time to read this

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

More Than 9,600 Join Suboxone Lawsuit Over Tooth Decay in MDL Filing
More Than 9,600 Join Suboxone Lawsuit Over Tooth Decay in MDL Filing (Posted today)

A bundled complaint of about 9,600 Suboxone lawsuits were filed in federal court on Friday, ahead of the two-year anniversary of the FDA requiring tooth decay label warnings on the opioid treatment film strips, which is also a deadline for filing a civil complaint in many states.

Lawyers Propose Direct Filing of Toxic Baby Food Lawsuits Over Autism, ADHD in Federal MDL
Lawyers Propose Direct Filing of Toxic Baby Food Lawsuits Over Autism, ADHD in Federal MDL (Posted today)

A federal judge has been asked to allow direct filing of future baby food lawsuits over autism and ADHD side effects with the MDL court, but the parties disagree over whether that order should allow multi-plaintiff complaints.

Social Media Mental Health Warnings Should Be Required To Protect Teens: U.S. Surgeon General
Social Media Mental Health Warnings Should Be Required To Protect Teens: U.S. Surgeon General (Posted 2 days ago)

U.S. Surgeon General says social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and Tiktok should carry label warnings, alerting parents that youth who use the platforms face an increased risk of mental health side effects.