Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Illegal Marketing of Relieva Stratus MicroFlow Spacer Results in $18M Settlement by J&J Unit July 27, 2016 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsA subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson has agreed to pay $18 million to settle a whistleblower lawsuit which alleged that the company engaged in illegal marketing for a drug delivery system, promoting uses that were never approved by the FDA.ย The Department of Justice (DOJ) announced the settlement agreement on July 22, indicating that Acclarent Inc. has agreed to resolve allegations of falsely and illegally marketing the Relieva Stratus MicroFlow Spacer (Stratus) as a drug delivery system.The claim involved charges brought against the California-based medical device company for allegedly marketing the Stratus devices as a drug delivery device without FDA approval, even after being previously rejected by the FDA in 2007 to expand the approved uses. Federal officials claimed the deceptive marketing of the devices resulted in healthcare providers submitting false claims to Medicare and other federal healthcare programs for the unapproved use of the Stratus device.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONAcclarentโs Relieva Stratus MicroFlow Spacer was approved by the FDA in 2006, for use as a spacer and only to be used with saline to maintain sinus openings following certain surgeries. However, Acclarent petitioned to the FDA in 2007 to expand the approved uses to include drug delivery purposes for prescription corticosteroids, but the petition was denied after the device failed to meet FDA standards.The DOJ and the FDA joined a whistleblower lawsuit filed under the False Claims Act against Acclarent this year in U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts after discovering the manufacturer had been marketing the device for drug delivery uses despite the FDA’s rejection.According to the lawsuit, as part of Acclarentโs marketing and sales pitch, employees from the company actually trained physicians with a tutorial video that demonstrated the Stratus device being used to deliver a white, milky substance, resembling prescription corticosteroid Kenalog-40. Acclarent was also accused of lying to healthcare providers in telling them during sales meeting that the Stratus device was specifically designed and engineered for delivery purposes.By May 2013, Acclarent voluntarily discontinued all sales of the Stratus device and withdrew all approved FDA clearances, making the devices no longer available for sale in the United States.The $18 million settlement agreement brings an end to Acclarentโs civil trial with federal officials. However, Acclarentโs former Chief Executive Officer, William Facteau, and former Vice President of Sales, Patrick Fabian, were convicted of 10 misdemeanor counts of introducing adulterated and misbranded medical devices into interstate commerce after a six-week trial.“The FDA plays a fundamental role in ensuring the safety and efficacy of medical devices and drugs in this country,โ U.S. Attorney Carmen M. Ortiz said in the DOJ press release.ย โEvery time that patients receive a medical device or fill a prescription they should be able to take for granted that the FDAโs requirements have been met.ย We will vigorously pursue those who ignore or seek to circumvent these important patient protections.โMelayna Lokosky, the person who brought the case to the government’s attention, will receive about $3.5 million of the settlement under the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Acclarent, Johnson & Johnson, Qui Tam, Whistleblower, Whistleblower CompensationMore Lawsuit Stories Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion July 8, 2026 Amazon Heated Socks Lawsuit Claims Defective Battery Combusted Resulting in House Fire July 8, 2026 Taxotere Watery Eyes Lawsuits Cleared To Move Forward Over Inadequate Side Effect Warnings July 8, 2026 0 Comments CompanyThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (Posted: today)Plaintiffs have requested that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidate all Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in the Central District of California for pretrial procedures.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITProclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (07/06/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026) Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (Posted: yesterday)An AngioDynamics Vortex port lawsuit alleges the implantable port catheter caused a South Carolina woman to suffer pulmonary embolisms and a serious infection requiring surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITAngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Claims Womanโs SmartPort Implants Caused Multiple Infections (06/23/2026)Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis (06/12/2026)Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (06/03/2026) Proclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (Posted: 2 days ago)A Texas man’s lawsuit claims the electrodes and battery of an Abbott spinal cord stimulator tried to push out of his skin, resulting in a severe infection and the need for surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (07/08/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)
Taxotere Watery Eyes Lawsuits Cleared To Move Forward Over Inadequate Side Effect Warnings July 8, 2026
Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (Posted: today)Plaintiffs have requested that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidate all Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in the Central District of California for pretrial procedures.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITProclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (07/06/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)
Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (Posted: yesterday)An AngioDynamics Vortex port lawsuit alleges the implantable port catheter caused a South Carolina woman to suffer pulmonary embolisms and a serious infection requiring surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITAngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Claims Womanโs SmartPort Implants Caused Multiple Infections (06/23/2026)Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis (06/12/2026)Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (06/03/2026)
Proclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (Posted: 2 days ago)A Texas man’s lawsuit claims the electrodes and battery of an Abbott spinal cord stimulator tried to push out of his skin, resulting in a severe infection and the need for surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (07/08/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)