Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Senate Bill Seeks To Block States, NHTSA From Setting Rules For Self-Driving Cars July 14, 2017 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsRepublicans senators are expected to soon introduce a package of 14 bills, which seek to prevent both state and federal officials from regulating self-driving vehicles.ย The bills, which have not yet been submitted, would exempt self-driving technology from oversight and safety rules by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), in up to 100,000 vehicles per manufacturer. The bills would also prevent states from setting their own standards for self-driving technology as well, according to a report by Reuters.Under the Motor Vehicle Safety Act, the NHTSA regulates essentially every component of a vehicle that is introduced into the market, with the primary focus of that regulatory authority aimed at the physical components. However, as the automotive industry enters into a much more technology based era, the NHTSA has reinterpreted its jurisdiction to extend to software, including associated programs, instructions, code, and remotely accessed apps that are arguably not motor vehicle systems, parts, or components.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONIn April 2016, the NHTSA issued a draft Enforcement Guidance Bulletin explaining how it interprets the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act to provide the agency with authority over emerging technologies, such as software and mobile apps that are not necessarily parts of the vehicle themselves, but interact with the control and operation of the car or truck. However, the bills being introduced by U.S. House Republicans would interpret the NHTSA regulatory authority differently, stating the agency would have no regulatory authority to oversee or recall vehicles using self-driving software.The bills are greatly in favor of the automobile industry, who would be relieved of regulatory oversight from the NHTSA when producing software designed to allow vehicles to operate without the need for human control.Reuters reports that the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which is a group representing General Motors Co., Volkswagen AG, Toyota Motor Corp., and several other major U.S. automobile manufacturers, have formed a Coalition for Future Mobility to press Congress to act on the bills. Included in the group are the Motor & Equipment Manufacturers Association, National Federation of the Blind, and Securing Americaโs Future Energy, who plan to begin airing radio ads within the upcoming weeks portraying the Senate bills as โliberating innovation for self-driving vehicles.โSupporters of the legislation say that the NHTSA lacks experience in software regulation, and that the legislation would allow the faster introduction of the vehicles onto the market.Many experts from the auto industry have expressed concern that the new guidance introduced by the agency in April 2016, which proposed the agencyโs jurisdiction should span over software and apps regulation in vehicles, may hinder the production of new vehicle safety software technology, by subjecting the development, testing and implementation to government regulation. However, Democrats have urged the NHTSA to take a more aggressive approach to battle the legislation and maintain regulatory oversight of the self-driving software introduced in vehicles across the nation.NHTSA officials have said they understand there are many obstacles to still overcome to safely implement self-driving vehicles, such as improving marked roadways, sensor enhancements, weather interference, traffic signal controls and technology responsiveness to emergency vehicles.Although the goal of self-driving technology is to prevent crashes, injuries and fatalities, putting unsafe technology on the roadways could have the opposite effect. According to the NHTSA, full introduction of self-driving vehicles onto U.S. roadways with the current versions of the technology that is available could be extremely dangerous and an unnecessary risk. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Auto Accident, CongressMore Lawsuit Stories Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery September 29, 2026 IVF Embryo Lawsuit Alleges Ovation Fertility PGT-A Testing Error Caused Loss September 29, 2026 DraftKings ‘Free Bet’ Promos Targeted Problem Gamblers Using AI: Report September 29, 2026 0 Comments InstagramThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (Posted: today)A Texas woman’s Boston Scientific SCS implant lawsuit claims she spent several years with a broken device in her back, but did not remove it because the company’s sales representatives said it just needed reprogramming.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)Boston Scientific Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Numbness, Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction (09/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (09/10/2026) First Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit Set for Bellwether Trial on Sept. 7, 2027 (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has scheduled the first hair relaxer cancer lawsuit bellwether trial for September 7, 2027.MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITL’Oreal Faces State AG Lawsuit Over Cancer Risks From Hair Relaxers (09/15/2026)L’Oreal Execs To Face More Questions Over Dark and Lovely, Hair Relaxer Cancer Risks (06/29/2026)Group of 38 Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (05/27/2026) Online Gambling Addiction Lawsuit Alleges DraftKings App Fueled Compulsive Sports Betting (Posted: 4 days ago)DraftKings faces an online gambling addiction lawsuit claiming a man wagered millions due to targeted promotions that focused on signs of compulsive behavior and exploited them.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings ‘Free Bet’ Promos Targeted Problem Gamblers Using AI: Report (09/29/2026)DraftKings, FanDuel Lawsuit Alleges VIP Managers Fueled More Than $130K in Gambling Losses (09/18/2026)DraftKings Lawsuit Indicates ‘Event Contracts’ Are Nothing More Than Sports Bets (09/11/2026)
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery September 29, 2026
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (Posted: today)A Texas woman’s Boston Scientific SCS implant lawsuit claims she spent several years with a broken device in her back, but did not remove it because the company’s sales representatives said it just needed reprogramming.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)Boston Scientific Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Numbness, Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction (09/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (09/10/2026)
First Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawsuit Set for Bellwether Trial on Sept. 7, 2027 (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has scheduled the first hair relaxer cancer lawsuit bellwether trial for September 7, 2027.MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITL’Oreal Faces State AG Lawsuit Over Cancer Risks From Hair Relaxers (09/15/2026)L’Oreal Execs To Face More Questions Over Dark and Lovely, Hair Relaxer Cancer Risks (06/29/2026)Group of 38 Hair Relaxer Cancer Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (05/27/2026)
Online Gambling Addiction Lawsuit Alleges DraftKings App Fueled Compulsive Sports Betting (Posted: 4 days ago)DraftKings faces an online gambling addiction lawsuit claiming a man wagered millions due to targeted promotions that focused on signs of compulsive behavior and exploited them.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings ‘Free Bet’ Promos Targeted Problem Gamblers Using AI: Report (09/29/2026)DraftKings, FanDuel Lawsuit Alleges VIP Managers Fueled More Than $130K in Gambling Losses (09/18/2026)DraftKings Lawsuit Indicates ‘Event Contracts’ Are Nothing More Than Sports Bets (09/11/2026)